Advertisement

Dialogicality in Dance: Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, …?

  • Dania Antinori
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Psychology book series (BRIEFSPSYCHOL)

Abstract

The traditional dance class model in Luxembourg’s state supported conservatories is usually structured hierarchically, with the teacher standing in front of the class interacting with the students, while little interaction amongst the students takes place. Within this traditional dance class model, communication is nonetheless made possible through the medium of the mirror, which opens up the possibility for dialogue between the teacher and the student on different levels. Drawing on the Dialogical Self Theory I attempt to illustrate how dance students construct meaning and develop their self as students and individuals within the dance class environment. My analysis focuses on the communicative aspect of the dance mirror and how it affects internal dialogues. To this end, I have interviewed 12 dance students of intermediate to advanced level, attending the Conservatoire de Musique Esch-sur-Alzette in Luxembourg. The individual interviews focused on aspects such as motivation, ability to adapt, specific dance class behaviour and personal goals.

Keywords

Dialogical Self Theory Dance education Responsibility Mirror Dance student Dialogue 

References

  1. Adams, M., Bell, L., & Griffin, P. (1997). Teaching for diversity and social justice: A sourcebook. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, J., Grant, S., & Morlock, L. (2008). The teacher–student relationship as a developmental context for children with internalizing or externalizing behaviour problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakthin, M. (1973). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Ann Arbor: Ardis.Google Scholar
  4. Bond, K., & Stinson, S. (2001). “It feels like I’m going to take off!” young people’s experiences of the superordinary in dance. Dance Research Journal, 32(2), 52–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, K., & Stinson, S. (2007). “It’s work, work, work, work”: Young people’s experiences of effort and engagement in dance. Research in Dance Education, 8(2), 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brodie, J. A., & Lobel, E. E. (2008). More than just a mirror image: The visual system and other modes of learning and performing dance. Journal of Dance Education, 8(1), 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Howard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Buckroyd, J. (2000). The student dancer. Emotional aspects of the teaching and learning of dance. London: Dance Books.Google Scholar
  9. Dearborn, K., & Ross, R. (2006). Dance learning and the mirror: Comparison study of dance phrase learning with and without mirrors. Journal of Dance Education, 6(4), 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hermans, H. J. M. (2008). How to perform research on the basis of dialogical self theory? Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 21, 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hermans, H. J. M., & Gieser, T. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of dialogical self theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory. Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). London: Mcmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. O’Neill, S. (2011). Learning in and through music performance: Understanding cultural diversity via inquiry and dialogue. In M. Burrett (Ed.), A cultural psychology of music education (pp. 179–200). Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Purser, A. (2011). The dancing body-subject: Merleau-Ponty’s mirror stage in the dance studio. Subjectivity, 4(2), 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Radell, S. A. (2013). Mirrors in the dance class: Help or hindrance? International Association for Dance Medicine and Science. Retrieved from https://www.iadms.org/page/400.
  17. Schoem, D., Hurtado, S., Sevig, T., Chesler, M., & Sumida, S. H. (2001). Intergroup dialogue: Democracy at work in theory and practice. In D. Schoem & S. Hurtado (Eds.), Intergroup dialogue: Deliberative democracy in school, college, community, and workplace (pp. 1–21). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Skrinar, M., & Moses, N. H. (1988). Who’s teaching the dance class? In P. M. Clarkson & M. Skrinar (Eds.), Science of dance training. Champaigne: Human Kinetics Books.Google Scholar
  19. Ward Warren, G. (1989). Classical Ballet Technique. Tampa: University of South Florida Press.Google Scholar
  20. Wiggins, J. (2011). When the music is theirs: Scaffolding young songwriters. In M. Burrett (Ed.), A cultural psychology of music education (pp. 83–113). Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Valsiner, J. (2006). Scaffolding within the structure of dialogical self: Hierarchical dynamics of semiotic mediation. New Ideas in Psychology, 23, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Libre de BruxellesBruxellesBelgium

Personalised recommendations