Advertisement

Migrating Identities: Affective Dialogues Across Generations

  • Stephanie Barros
  • Isabelle Albert
  • Dieter Ferring
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Psychology book series (BRIEFSPSYCHOL)

Abstract

Dialogical Self Theory recognizes the interaction between self and others. The basic nature of human condition is indeed to be in indefinite and constant interdependence with the existence of “the other” and his experiences, thoughts, practices as well as his narrations. Yet, the character and degree of these interdependencies vary and fluctuate depending on the individuals, contexts and cultures. While the external dialogue occurs between people implicated in an overt interaction, the self happens in an individual’s mind as an internal dialogue. Individuals make sense of their lives through the narratives of crucial experiences in their lives, which makes the external dialogue discernible and easier to analyse compared to the internal dialogue not that easily tangible. Though, through an intergenerational interview between an adult daughter and her mother, we will try to assess and identify their individual internal dialogues within their narratives. Hence, to that end body language and behavioural indicators such as face expressions or silent thinking will be used, which may help and serve as guidelines to assess the intergenerational dialogical interaction between mother and adult child in a migrant context.

Keywords

Migration Family relations Dialogical interaction Narrative approach Behavioural indicators 

Bibliography

  1. Albert, I. (2013). Intergenerational relations in the light of migration and ageing – IRMA. Unpublished research proposal to the Fonds National de la Recherche, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  2. Albert, I., & Barros, S. (2017). Family culture in the context of migration and ageing. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-017-9381-y.
  3. Albert, I., Ferring, D., & Michels, T. (2013). Intergenerational family relations in Luxembourg: Family values and intergenerational solidarity in Portuguese immigrant and Luxembourgish families. European Psychologist, 18(1), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aveling, E.-M., Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F. (2014). A qualitative method for analysing multivoicedness. Qualitative Research, 4(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  5. Batory, A. M. (2010). Dialogicality and the construction of identity. International Journal for Dialogical Self, 4(1), 45–66.Google Scholar
  6. Beirão, D. (2010). La parole aux retraités portugais ! Vieillir entre deux patries [Giving retired Portuguese immigrants a voice! Ageing between two homelands]. In M. Pauly (Ed.), ASTI 30+. 30 ans de migrations, 30 ans de recherches, 30 ans d’engagements (pp. 190–197). Luxembourg: Binsfeld.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, N. J., & Das, A. (2011). Emergent organization in the dialogical self: Evolution of a “both” ethnic identity position. Culture & Psychology, 17(2), 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benet-Martinez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005). Bicultural identity integration (BII): Components and psychosocial antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 1015–1049.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bengtson, V. L., & Martin, P. (2001). Families and intergenerational relationships in aging societies: Comparing the United States with German-speaking countries. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 34(3), 207–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berger, F. (2008). Zoom sur les primo-arrivants portugais et leurs descendants [zoom on Portuguese newcomers and their offspring]. Vivre au Luxembourg : Chroniques de l’enquête PSELL, 49, 1–2.Google Scholar
  11. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An international Review, 46(1), 5–34.Google Scholar
  12. Bhatia, S., & Ram, A. (2001). Rethinking acculturation in relation to diasporic cultures and postcolonial identities. Human Development, 44, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bolognani, M. (2007). The myth of return: Dismissal, survival or revival? A Bradford example of transnationalism as a political instrument. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33, 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Breugelmans, S. M., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2004). Antecedents and components of majority attitudes toward multiculturalism in the Netherlands. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(3), 400–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruneau, T. J., & Ishii, S. (1988). Communicative silences: East and west. World Communication, 17(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
  16. Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Buhl, H. M. (2008). Significance of individuation in adult child-parent relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 29(2), 262–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Buhl, H. M., Scholwin, B., & Noack, P. (2015). Individuation in adults’ family interactions: An observational study. Journal of Adult Development, 22, 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carling, J. (2015). Myth of return. In J. Stone, R. M. Dennis, P. S. Rizova, A. D. Smith, & X. Hou (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of race, ethnicity, and nationalism (pp. 1507–1508). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Crites, S. (1986). Storytime: Recollecting the past and projecting the future. In T. R. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp. 152–173). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  21. Cunha, C. (2007). Constructing organization through multiplicity: A microgenetic analysis of self-organization in the dialogical self. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 2, 287–316.Google Scholar
  22. Cunha, C., Salgado, J., & Goncalves, M. (2012). The dialogical self in movement: Reflecting on methodological tools for the study of the dynamics of change and stability in the self. In E. Abbey & S. Surgan (Eds.), Emerging methods in psychology (pp. 65–100). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Ellis, B. D., & Stam, H. J. (2010). Addressing the other in dialogue: Ricoeur and the ethical dimensions of the dialogical self. Theory & Psychology, 20(3), 420–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ezzy, D. (2000). Illness narratives: Time, hope and HIV. Social Science & Medicine, 50(5), 605–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fleury, C. (2010). Les attitudes et les pratiques de solidarité intergénérationnelle des immigrants portugais du Luxembourg : Une étude comparative [The attitudes and practices of intergenerational solidarity of Portuguese immigrants in Luxembourg: A comparative study]. CEPS/INSTEAD, Working Paper No 2010–24. Google Scholar
  26. Frisch, M. (1967). Öffentlichkeit als Partner [The public as a reliable partner]. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp Vlg.Google Scholar
  27. Gillespie, A., & Martin, J. (2014). Position exchange theory: A socio-material basis for discursive and psychological positioning. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 73–79.Google Scholar
  28. Glick, J. E. (2010). Connecting complex processes: A decade of research on immigrant families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 498–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grossen, M. (2010). Interaction analysis and psychology: A dialogical perspective. Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Science, 44(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hermans, H. J. M. (2001a). Conceptions of self and identity: Toward a dialogical view. International Journal of Education and Religion, 1, 43–62.Google Scholar
  31. Hermans, H. J. M. (2001b). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hermans, H. J. M. (2001c). The construction of a personal position repertoire: Method and practice. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 323–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hermans, H. J. M. (2002). The dialogical self as a society of mind. Theory & Psychology, 12(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
  34. Hermans, H. J. M., Kempen, H. J. G., & Van Loon, R. J. P. (1992). The dialogical self – Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47(1), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kagitcibasi, C., Ataca, B., & Diri, A. (2010). Intergenerational relationships in the family: Ethnic, socioeconomic, and country variations in Germany, Israel, Palestine and Turkey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(5-6), 652–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. König, J. (2009). Moving experience: Dialogues between personal cultural positions. Culture & Psychology, 15(1), 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lehmann, O. (2014). Man’s search for extra-ordinary answers in life: Silence as a catalyst for crisis-solving. In K. R. Cabell & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The catalyzing mind: Beyond models of causality (pp. 239–250). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Linde, C. (1993). Life stories. The creation of coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte: Information Age.Google Scholar
  42. Ling, W. N. (2003). Communicative functions and meanings of silence: An analysis of cross-cultural views. Multiculturalism. Studies, 3, 125–146.Google Scholar
  43. Lüscher, K., & Pillemer, K. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Murdock, E. (2016). Multiculturalism, identity and difference: Experiences of culture contact. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ragatt, P. T. F. (2014). The dialogical self as a time-space matrix: Personal chronotopes and ambiguous signifiers. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reis, O., & Buhl, H. M. (2008). Individuation during adolescence and emerging adulthood – five German studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(5), 369–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ribeiro, A. P., & Gonçalves, M. M. (2010). Innovation and stability within the dialogical self: The centrality of ambivalence. Culture & Psychology, 16(1), 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ruspini, P. (2009). Elderly migrants in Europe: An overview of trends, policies and practices. Switzerland: University of Lugano (USI). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/librarydoc/eldery-migrants-in-europe-an-overview-of-trends-policies-and-practices.Google Scholar
  49. Schneewind, K. (1995). Familienentwcklung. In R. Oerter & L. Montada (Eds.), Entwicklungspsychologie: ein Lehrbuch (pp. 242–262). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union, Beltz.Google Scholar
  50. Tourbeaux, J. (2012). L’intégration des Portugais du Luxembourg [The integration of Portuguese from Luxembourg]. Working Paper N° 2012–09, CEPS/INSTEAD. Google Scholar
  51. Valsiner, J. (2002). Forms of dialogical relations and semiotic autoregulation within the self. Theory & Psychology, 12(2), 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vedder, P., Berry, J. W., Sabatier, C., & Sam, D. (2009). The intergenerational transmission of values in national and immigrant families: The role of zeitgeist. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 642–653.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yuan, Y.Q. (2015). Analysis of silence in intercultural communication. International conference on economy, management and education technology (ICEMET 2015).Google Scholar
  54. Zick, A., Wagner, U., Van Dick, R., & Petzel, T. (2001). Acculturation and prejudice in Germany: Majority and minority perspectives. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 541–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zittoun, T., Valsiner, J., Vedeler, D., Salgado, J., Gonçalves, M., & Ferring, D. (2013). Human development in the life course. Melodies of living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc..Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie Barros
    • 1
  • Isabelle Albert
    • 1
  • Dieter Ferring
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LuxembourgEsch-sur-AlzetteLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations