Abstract
The TrowelBlazers project provides an example of how public participation can radically influence an archival heritage project. Conceived as a Tumblr site where a limited group could post content celebrating female archaeologists, geologists, and palaeontologists, we soon allowed ‘guest’ posts, which rapidly broadened the scope of our project. Through our participatory social media networks, TrowelBlazers became involved in STEM, feminist, and heritage actions. Contact with organisations promoting women’s involvement in science led to collaborations with broader feminist networks including The Women’s Room UK, Finding Ada Project, and ScienceGrrl alongside invited contributions to science education events (e.g. by the UK Environment and Science Research Council). TrowelBlazers hosted very successful Wikipedia edit-athons for Ada Lovelace Day at the Natural History Museum, London, and took part in Brown University’s event. More importantly, the accessibility and frequently crowdsourced nature of our content have allowed TrowelBlazers to directly engage with the nonacademic public to promote awareness of women’s contributions to heritage to a much broader public through activities like a feature in a magazine for pre-teen girls, a video project with a performance artist who plays an idealised girl’s role model, and even a toy maker.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Notes
- 1.
Such as the Thames Discovery Programme, which offers training to volunteers from the interested public to record and interpret the history of the Thames River (www.thamesdiscovery.org).
References
Association of Research Libraries. (2012). Code of best practices in fair use for academic and research libraries. Washington, DC: Center for Social Media/School of Communication/American University.
Bauer, M. W. (2014). A word from the editor on the special issue on ‘public engagement’. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 3.
Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. Brisbane: ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation. eprints.qut.edu.au.
Caton-Thompson, G., & Gardner, E. W. (1932). The prehistoric geography of Kharga oasis. The Geographical Journal, 80, 369–406.
Cohen, G. M., & Joukowsky, M. S. (2004). Breaking ground: Pioneering women archaeologists. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hassett, B. R. (2011). Blogging archaeology: The reckoning, passim in passing. http://passiminpassing.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/blogging-archaeology-reckoning.html. Accessed 15/04/15.
Hassett, B. R., Herridge, V., Pilaar Birch, S., & Wragg Sykes, R. (2014). Panel discussion, revealing lives: Women in science 1830–2000, London, Royal Society.
Herridge, V. L. (2013a). TrowelBlazers: Celebrating awesome trowel-wielding women. http://sciencegrrl.co.uk/trowelblazers-celebrating-awesome-trowel-wielding-women/. Accessed 15/04/15.
Herridge, V. L. (2013b). A very incomplete network of early 20th century pioneering women archaeologists.
Herridge, V. L. (2014). TrowelBlazers: In search of the female Indiana Jones, Leading Women, 1 July 2014 ed., CNN.
Jameson, J. H., & Baugher, S. (2007). Past meets present: Archaeologists partnering with museum curators, teachers and community groups. New York: Springer.
Jasanoff, S. (2014). A mirror for science. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 21–26.
Jucan, M. S., & Jucan, C. N. (2014). The power of science communication. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 461–466.
Merriman, N. (2004). Public archaeology. London: Routledge.
Morgan, C., & Eve, S. (2012). DIY and digital archaeology: What are you doing to participate? World Archaeology, 44, 521–537.
Morgan, C., & Winters, J. (2015). Introduction: Critical blogging in archaeology. Internet Archaeology 39.
OST/Wellcome Trust Report. (2000). Science and the public: A review of science communication and public attitudes to science in Britain. A joint report by the Office of Science and Technology and the Wellcome Trust, Office of Science and Technology/Wellcome Trust, London.
Pilaar Birch, S. (2013a). Mary Anning: Google doodle celebrates the missing woman of geology, The Guardian.
Pilaar Birch, S. (2013b). Using social media for research dissemination: The digital research video project. Internet Archaeology, 35.
Richardson, L. (2013). A digital public archaeology? Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 23, 10.
Rifkin, A., 2013. Tumblr is not what you think, TechCrunch.
Scindler, K. (2005). Discovering Dorothea: The life of the pioneering fossil-hunter Dorothea Bate. London: HarperCollins.
Wehrmann, C., & Dijkstra, A. (2014). New practices in science communication: Roles of professionals in science and technology development, 13th international public communication of science and technology conference, Salvador, Brazil.
Wiegold, M. F. (2001). Communicating science: A review of the literature. Science Communication, 23, 164–193.
Wild, A. (2013). Facebook’s “I F*cking Love Science” does not f*cking love artists, Scientific American.
Wragg Sykes, R. M. (2012). The rocks remain. http://www.therocksremain.org/.
Wragg Sykes, R. (2013). Who invented clothes? A Palaeolithic archaeologist answers, The Guardian.
Wragg-Sykes, B., Herridge, V., Hassett, B. R., & Pilaar-Birch, S. (2013). A splendid regiment of women: 20th century research networks among women scientists in archaeology, geology and palaeontology. In S. Charman-Anderson (Ed.), A passion for science. London: Finding Ada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hassett, B., Birch, S.P., Herridge, V., Wragg Sykes, R. (2018). TrowelBlazers: Accidentally Crowdsourcing an Archive of Women in Archaeology. In: Apaydin, V. (eds) Shared Knowledge, Shared Power. SpringerBriefs in Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68652-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68652-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68651-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68652-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)