Advertisement

The Marriage of Figaro and the Sunset of Ancien Régime Legacy on Modern Legal Culture

  • Elena FallettiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this abstract is focused on the character of the Count of Almaviva as representative of the transition from the Ancien Régime to the Nouveau Régime. Despite the fact that the opera plot is focused on the adventures of Susanna and Figaro in order to get married, its legal pivot is on the feudal lord who seeks to enforce his status and his rights, first of all his “ius primae noctis” on Susanna, his wife’s lady-in-waiting. He tried to seduce her for all the opera but he fails, proving himself ridiculous and surpassed.

From the private law perspective, the Count exploits Figaro’s promise of marriage to Marcellina in the event of the breach of a debt incurred some time before. Despite his conflict of interest because he is the master, the Count tries to mislead the judgement of his subordinate, unsuccessfully, due to the parent–child relationship between Marcellina and Figaro themselves. However, he does not give up and the final double exchange of role keeps him in a ridiculous situation to obtain forgiveness from his wife, the Countess, quite a proto-feminist in this opera.

From the public law perspective, the crisis of the figure of the Count of Almaviva clearly represents the decline of aristocracy itself. None of his subjects are afraid of him. For instance, Cherubino escapes the mandatory enrollment in the Count’s regiment by dressing up as a girl. This is not only of scenic value, but it could also represent a crisis of social roles on the eve of the French Revolution.

The Marriage of Figaro represents an indispensable inspiration for historical and multidisciplinary reflections to analyze the paradigm shifts which occurred in the late seventeenth century and the legacy they have left on today’s legal culture.

References

  1. Andrews R (2001) From Beaumarchais to Da Ponte: a new view of the sexual politics of ‘Figaro’. Music Lett 82:214–233. 214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bietti G (2015) Mozart all’opera. Le Nozze di Figaro, Don Giovanni, Così Fan tutte. Laterza, Bari-RomaGoogle Scholar
  3. Boele-Woelki K, Cherednychenko O, Lieeke C (2003) Dutch Report. In: Boele-Woelki K, Braat B, Curry-Sumner (eds) European family law in action, vol I: Ground for divorce. Intersentia, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullough VL (1991) Jus Primae Noctis or Droit du Seigneur. J Sex Res 1991:163–166Google Scholar
  5. Cleves RH (2014) Charity and Sylvia: a same-sex marriage in early America. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Cordes R (1999) Using the pastoral toward a feminist read of Le Nozze di Figaro. Semiotics 344–359Google Scholar
  7. Giordano R (2009) Giuramento suppletorio in Giurisprudenza di meritoGoogle Scholar
  8. Lorenzetti A (2013) Diritti in transito. Franco Angeli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  9. Manieri C (2014) Assistenza a soggetti in età evolutiva con ‘Organizzazione Atipica dell’identità di Genere’ (AGIO), unpublished, courtesy of the authorGoogle Scholar
  10. Manieri C (2015) La Disforia di Genere: aspetti psico-endocrini, courtesy of the authorGoogle Scholar
  11. Manieri C, Einaudi S, Fischer A (2014) Orientamento sessuale e distubri dell’identità di genere in epoca adolescenziale. In: Foresta C, Lenzi A, Ferlin A, Garolla A (eds) Gli scenari della fertilità umanatra ambiente e società. Cleup, PadovaGoogle Scholar
  12. Martiny D (2003) German Report. In: Boele-Woelki K, Braat B, Curry-Sumner (eds) European family law in action, vol I: Ground for divorce. Intersentia, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Naitana M (2015) In tema di giuramento decisorio. Nota a App. Cagliari sez. I civ. 19 ottobre 2012, n. 472, Rivista giuridica sarda, 20–33Google Scholar
  14. Quattrociocchi W, Scala A, Sunstein C R, Echo Chambers on Facebook (2016) https://ssrn.com/abstract=2795110. Accessed 18 May 2017
  15. Russo M (2015) ‘Animus confitendi’ e prudente apprezzamento della dichiarazione confessoria. Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, 997–1009Google Scholar
  16. Schneider E (2013) An insight into respect for the rights of trans and intersex children in Europe. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  17. Skougard E (2011) The best interests of transgender children. Utah Law Rev, p 1165Google Scholar
  18. Sörgjerd C (2012) Reconstructing marriage. The legal status of relationships in a changing society. Intersentia, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Wettlaufer J (2000) The jus primae noctis as a male power display: a review of historic sources with evolutionary interpretation. Evol Hum Behav 21:111–123: 119Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carlo Cattaneo UniversityCastellanzaItaly

Personalised recommendations