Skip to main content

Vibration-Based Monitoring of Civil Structures with Subspace-Based Damage Detection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mechatronics for Cultural Heritage and Civil Engineering

Abstract

Automatic vibration-based structural health monitoring has been recognized as a useful alternative or addition to visual inspections or local non-destructive testing performed manually. It is, in particular, suitable for mechanical and aeronautical structures as well as on civil structures, including cultural heritage sites. The main challenge is to provide a robust damage diagnosis from the recorded vibration measurements, for which statistical signal processing methods are required. In this chapter, a damage detection method is presented that compares vibration measurements from the current system to a reference state in a hypothesis test, where data-related uncertainties are taken into account. The computation of the test statistic on new measurements is straightforward and does not require a separate modal identification. The performance of the method is firstly shown on a steel frame structure in a laboratory experiment. Secondly, the application on real measurements on S101 Bridge is shown during a progressive damage test, where damage was successfully detected for different damage scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Balmès E, Basseville M, Bourquin F, Mevel L, Nasser H, Treyssède F (2008) Merging sensor data from multiple temperature scenarios for vibration-based monitoring of civil structures. Struct Health Monitor 7(2):129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balmès E, Basseville M, Mevel L, Nasser H (2009) Handling the temperature effect in vibration-based monitoring of civil structures: a combined subspace-based and nuisance rejection approach. Control Eng Pract 17(1):80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balmès E, Basseville M, Mevel L, Nasser H, Zhou W (2008) Statistical model-based damage localization: a combined subspace-based and substructuring approach. Struct Control Health Monitor 15(6):857–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Basseville M, Abdelghani M, Benveniste A (2000) Subspace-based fault detection algorithms for vibration monitoring. Automatica 36(1):101–109

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Basseville M, Bourquin F, Mevel L, Nasser H, Treyssède F (2010) Handling the temperature effect in vibration monitoring: two subspace-based analytical approaches. J Eng Mech 136(3):367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Basseville M, Mevel L, Goursat M (2004) Statistical model-based damage detection and localization: subspace-based residuals and damage-to-noise sensitivity ratios. J Sound Vibration 275(3):769–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernal D (2013) Kalman filter damage detection in the presence of changing process and measurement noise. Mech Syst Signal Process 39(1–2):361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brownjohn J, De Stefano A, Xu Y, Wenzel H, Aktan A (2011) Vibration-based monitoring of civil infrastructure: challenges and successes. J Civil Struct Health Monitor 1(3):79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carden E, Fanning P (2004) Vibration based condition monitoring: a review. Struct Health Monitor 3(4):355–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Döhler M, Hille, F (2014) Subspace-based damage detection on steel frame structure under changing excitation. In: Proceedings of 32nd International Modal Analysis Conference. Orlando, FL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Döhler M, Hille F, Mevel L, Rücker W (2014) Structural health monitoring with statistical methods during progressive damage test of S101 Bridge. Eng Struct 69:183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Döhler M, Mevel L (2013) Subspace-based fault detection robust to changes in the noise covariances. Automatica 49(9):2734–2743

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Döhler M, Mevel L, Hille F (2014) Subspace-based damage detection under changes in the ambient excitation statistics. Mech Syst Signal Process 45(1):207–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Döhler M, Mevel L, Zhang Q (2016) Fault detection, isolation and quantification from Gaussian residuals with application to structural damage diagnosis. Ann Rev Control 42:244–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fan W, Qiao P (2011) Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study. Struct Health Monitor 10(1):83–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Farrar C, Worden K (2007) An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philoso Trans Royal Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1851):303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hille F, Petryna Y, Rücker W (2014) Subspace-based detection of fatigue damage on a steel frame laboratory structure for offshore applications. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014. Porto, Portugal, July 2014

    Google Scholar 

  18. Juang JN (1994) Applied system identification. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kullaa J (2003) Damage detection of the Z24 Bridge using control charts. Mech Syst Signal Process 17(1):163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramos L, Marques L, Lourenço P, De Roeck G, Campos-Costa A, Roque J (2010) Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: two case studies. Mech Syst Signal Process 24(5):1291–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rytter A (1993) Vibrational based inspection of civil engineering structures. Ph.D. thesis, Aalborg University, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  22. Structural Vibration Solutions A/S: ARTeMIS modal pro–damage detection plugin (2015). www.svibs.com

  23. VCE (2009) Progressive damage test S101 Flyover Reibersdorf/draft. Tech. Rep. 08/2308, VCE

    Google Scholar 

  24. Worden K, Manson G, Fieller N (2000) Damage detection using outlier analysis. JSound Vibr 229(3):647–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yan A, De Boe P, Golinval J (2004) Structural damage diagnosis by Kalman model based on stochastic subspace identification. Struct Health Monitor 3(2):103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Helmut Wenzel, VCE, and the FP7 IRIS project for providing the data from S101 Bridge.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Döhler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

The damage detection test statistic s is set up using measurements from the reference state of the structure, requiring the estimation of the left null space matrix S, the residual covariance matrix \(\Sigma \) and setting up a threshold t.

First, the Hankel matrix \(\widehat{\mathscr {H}}_{p+1,q}^0\) is computed from the reference measurements. Then, the left null space matrix S can be estimated from its SVD

$$\begin{aligned} \widehat{\mathscr {H}}_{p+1,q}^0 = \begin{bmatrix}U_1&\ U_0\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}\Delta _1&0 \\ \ 0&\ \Delta _0\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}V_1 \\ V_0\end{bmatrix} \end{aligned}$$
(9)

as \(\widehat{S}=U_0\), where the SVD is truncated at the desired model order n with \(\Delta _1 \in \mathbb {R}^{n\times n}\) and \(\Delta _0 \approx 0\).

Second, the residual covariance matrix \(\Sigma \) is obtained by separating the available reference dataset into \(n_b\) data blocks of length \(N_b\), such that the total data length yields \(N=n_bN_b\). On each block, the Hankel matrix is computed as

$$ \widehat{R}_i^{(j)} = \frac{1}{N_b} \sum _{k=1+(j-1)N_b}^{jN_b} y_k y_{k-i}^T, \ \ \ \widehat{\mathscr {H}}_{p+1,q}^{(j)} = \mathrm{Hank}(\widehat{R}_i^{(j)} ) $$

Then, \(\widehat{\mathscr {H}}_{p+1,q}^0= \frac{1}{n_b}\sum _{j=1}^{n_b} \widehat{\mathscr {H}}_{p+1,q}^{(j)}\) and the covariance estimate of the residual follows from the covariance of the sample mean as

$$ \widehat{\Sigma }= \frac{N_b}{n_b-1} \sum _{j=1}^{n_b} \mathrm{vec }\left( S^T\widehat{\mathscr {H}}_{p+1,q}^{(j)} - S^T\widehat{\mathscr {H}}_{p+1,q}^0\right) \mathrm{vec }\left( S^T\widehat{\mathscr {H}}_{p+1,q}^{(j)} - S^T\widehat{\mathscr {H}}_{p+1,q}^0\right) ^T. $$

Finally, compute the test statistic s for several training datasets of length N from the reference state, and determine the threshold t from the test values for a desired type I error.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Döhler, M., Hille, F., Mevel, L. (2018). Vibration-Based Monitoring of Civil Structures with Subspace-Based Damage Detection. In: Ottaviano, E., Pelliccio, A., Gattulli, V. (eds) Mechatronics for Cultural Heritage and Civil Engineering. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 92. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68646-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68646-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68645-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68646-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics