Skip to main content

DS3 Model Testing: Assessing Critical Infrastructure Network Flood Resilience at the Neighbourhood Scale

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Disaster Resilience and Security

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

The behaviour of the urban network infrastructures, and their interactions during flood events, will have direct and indirect consequences on the flood risk level in the built environment. By urban network infrastructures we include all the urban technical networks like transportation, energy, water supply, waste water, telecommunication… able to spread the flood risk in cities, qualified as critical infrastructures due to their major roles for modern living standards. From history, most of cities in the world have been built close to coast lines or to river to beneficiate this means of communication and trade. Step by step, to avoid being flooded, defences like levees have been built. The capacity of the levees to retain the floods depends on their conditions, their performance level and the capacity of the authorities to well maintain these infrastructures. But recent history shows the limits of a flood risk management strategy focused on protection, leading to levee breaks these last twenty years, for example in the South of France. Then, in case of levee break, cities will be flooded. The urban technical networks, due to the way they have been designed, their conditions and their locations in the city, will play a major role in the diffusion of the flood extent. Also, the flood risk will have consequences in some not flooded neighbourhoods due to networks collapses and complex interdependencies. This chapter describes some methods to design spatial decision support systems in that context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AGO (Australian Greenhouse Office (2006) Climate change impacts & risk management—a guide for business and government. Department of Environment and Heritage, Australian Government, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahern J (2011) From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape Urban Plann 100(4):341–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman JW (1970) Behavior and Accident. J Safe Res

    Google Scholar 

  • Amendola A (1989) Planning and uncertainties. In proceeding of the 2nd World Bank Workshop on Risk Management and Safety Control, Karlstad, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker GH (2005, April) A vulnerability assessment methodology for critical infrastructure sites. Department of Homeland Security symposium: R&D partnerships in homeland security. Boston, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsells M, Barroca B, Amdal J, Diab Y, Becue V, Serre D (2013) Application of the DS3 model to the stormwater sewerage system at the neighborhood level, 8è Conférence Internationale Novatech, Lyon, 23–27 juin 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruijne MD, Eeten MV (2007) Systems that should have failed: critical infrastructure protection in an institutionally fragmented environment. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 15(1):18–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau M, Chang SE, Eguchi RT, Lee GC, O’Rourke TD, Reinhorn AM, Shinozuka M, Tierney KT, Wallace WA, Von Winterfeldt D (2003) A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra 19:733–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cancado, Nasciment and Barraud (2011) Flood Risk and Vulnerability an assessment based on urban network modeling. In proceeding of 12th international conference on Urban Drainage, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 11–16 September 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1998) Quantifying structural redundancy in ecological communities. Oecologia 113:278–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSA (Canadian Standards Association (1991) Risk Analysis Requirements and Guidelines. CAN/CSA Q634-M9

    Google Scholar 

  • DSB (1994) A guide to risk and vulnerability assessment in the municipality. Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection and Emergency Planning

    Google Scholar 

  • Eusgeld I, Kröger W, Sansavini G, Schläpfer M, Zio E (2009) The role of network theory and object oriented modeling within a framework for the vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructures. Reliabil Eng Syst Safe 94(5):954–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezell BC (2007) Infrastructure vulnerability assessment model (IVAM). Risk Anal 27(3):571–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimes YY, Longstaff T (2002) The role of risk analysis in the protection of critical infrastructures against terrorism. Risk Anal 22(3):439–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Ann Rev Ecol System 4:23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge K (2012) Floods in Hamburg. http://www.rigapretpludiem.lv/. Accessed 2 Mar 2013

  • LaPorte TR (2007) Critical infrastructure in the face of a predatory future: preparing for untoward surprise. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 15(1):60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis T ( 2006) Critical infrastructure protection in homeland security: defending a networked nation. John Wiley and Sons, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Lhomme S, Serre D, Diab Y, Laganier R (2011) A methodology to produce interdependent networks disturbance scenarios, vulnerability, uncertainty, and risk: analysis, modeling, and management. In: Proceedings of the ICVRAM 2011 and ISUMA 2011 Conferences 2011, Hyattsville, MD, USA, pp 724–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Lhomme S, Serre D, Diab Y, Laganier R (2013) Assessing the resilience of the urban networks: a preliminary step towards more flood resilient cities. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:221–230. www.nathazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/221/2013/. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013

  • Matisziw TC, Murray AT, Grubesic TH (2008) Exploring the vulnerability of network infrastructure to disruption. Ann Reg Sci 43(2):307–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally RK, Lee S-W, Yavagal D, Xiang W-N (2007) Learning the critical infrastructure interdependencies through an ontology based information system. Environ Plan 34(6):1103–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie L, Heilemann K, Hafskjold LS, Sægrov S, Johannessen BG (2009) Adapting community to flood risk and vulnerability caused by climate change. In: Pasch E, Evelpidou N, Zevenbergen C, Ashley R, Garvin S (eds) International conference of european and global communities combine forces on flood resilient cities, Paris, France, 26–27th November 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie L, Li P, Nilsen V (2012) Modelling climate change impacts on urban stormwater and adaptation efficiency (submitted), the 9th Joint IWA/IAHR Conference on Urban Drainage Modelling

    Google Scholar 

  • NTS (Norwegian Technology Standards Institution) (1998) Risk and Emergency Preparedness Analysis (Z-013). Rev. 1, March 1998, NORSOK standard.pp. 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang M, Hong L, Mao ZJ, Yu MH, Qi F (2009) A methodological approach to analyze vulnerability of interdependent infrastructures. Simul Model Pract Theory 17(5):817–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks RC, Rogers E (2008) Vulnerability assessment for critical infrastructure control systems. IEEE Secur Priv 6(6):37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson P, Dudenhoeffer D, Hartley S, Permann M (2005) Critical infrastructure interdependency modeling: a survey of U.S. and international research

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi SM (2004) Modeling and simulating critical infrastructures and their interdependencies. In: 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the, 00(C), 8 pp. Ieee. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265180

  • Serre D (2011) Flood resilient city—Assessment methods and tools Thesis for the obtention of the Habilitation to Lead Researches. Université Paris-Est, France, p 173

    Google Scholar 

  • Serre D, Barroca B, Laganier R (2013) Resilience and Urban Risk Management, CRC Press Balkema, Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-0-415-62147-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Serre D, Barroca B, Balsells M, Becue V (2016) Contributing to urban resilience to floods with neighbourhood design: the case of Am Sandtorkai/Dalmannkai in Hamburg. J Flood Risk Manage. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12253

  • Vatn J (2007) Description of tool for identification and estimation of risk related critical infrastructure (InfraRisk). Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Production and Quality Engineering, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler J, Dueñas-Osorio L, Stein R, Subramanian D (2010) Performance assessment of topologically diverse power systems subjected to hurricane events. Reliabil Eng Syst Safe 95(4):323–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q, Halsnæs K, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K et al (2009) Economic assessment of climate adaptation options for urban drainage in Odense, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damien Serre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Serre, D. (2018). DS3 Model Testing: Assessing Critical Infrastructure Network Flood Resilience at the Neighbourhood Scale. In: Fekete, A., Fiedrich, F. (eds) Urban Disaster Resilience and Security. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics