Skip to main content

The Liminal Tunnel: Authorial Voices in the War Zone

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reporting the First World War in the Liminal Zone
  • 178 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the liminal experience in the war zone of Arnold Bennett, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Rudyard Kipling, Mary Roberts Rinehart, May Sinclair, and Edith Wharton between late 1914 and the months before the Battle of the Somme. I focus on how the authors dealt with the complexities of their liminal experience, and how—wherever possible—they expressed it in terms of an inherited tradition of war writing. The chapter also looks at how the authors’ nationality and gender play a significant role in their representation of the war experience, and to what extent traditional notions of war representation are challenged or perpetuated in their accounts.

Part of this chapter has been rewritten from Prieto, Sara. 2015. “‘Without Methods’: Three Female Authors Visiting the Western Front.” First World War Studies 6 (2): 171–185.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the course of the war, “it came to be recognized that the mobilization of men and means was not sufficient; there must be a mobilization of opinion” (Lasswell 1927, p. 14) both at home and abroad. Words became an essential weapon in the struggle. For this reason, the government activated a propaganda campaign in favour of the conflict, in which several celebrated writers were involved. This campaign had a triple purpose: to encourage young soldiers to enlist, to keep up the morale in the civilian population, and to counteract German propaganda in neutral countries. In late August 1914, Charles Masterman organised two secret conferences which resulted in the establishment of the War Propaganda Bureau at Wellington House. The War Propaganda Bureau at Wellington House would soon become the most active of all propaganda departments established during the war (Taylor 1980, p. 877). It was responsible for producing and disseminating books, pamphlets, and periodicals overseas. Wellington House sponsored books which were published by private publishing houses to make it seem “that British propaganda was solely the creation of private citizens” (Buitenhuis 1989, p. xvii). Masterman’s objective was to mobilise and influence public opinion, most particularly that of neutral countries. To this end, he set up rallies, distributed posters, and created illustrated propaganda and pamphlets, which he expected to be of the “highest literary quality, academic in tone and scholarly in content, rather than simply propagandistic diatribes” (Sanders and Taylor 1982, p. 107). See Buitenhuis 1989, Sanders and Taylor 1982, and Taylor 1980 for further information on the propaganda campaign.

  2. 2.

    The Germans introduced the use of poison-gas in April 1915 during the Second Battle of Ypres. The British were the first among the Allies to introduce this lethal chemical weapon during the Battle of Loos in September 1915.

  3. 3.

    See Kelly’s 2015 introduction to Fighting France for further discussion on Wharton’s proposal to publish her war articles.

  4. 4.

    Before Rinehart, Lorimer had asked Corra Mae Harris to spend a few weeks in London to provide the woman’s perspective of the war (Talmadge 1968, p. 74). See Prieto 2015, p. 4 for further reference.

  5. 5.

    This is the same unit that allowed Philip Gibbs to have his experience under fire in October 1914. See Chap. 2 for further reference.

  6. 6.

    Only two weeks after the meeting at Wellington House, all the authors who had attended the first conference published the Authors’ Manifesto supporting the war. The manifesto was signed by 54 distinguished British writers in order to support the British effort in the war. Authors such as Sir James M. Barrie, Arnold Bennett, G. K. Chesterton, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, John Galsworthy, Thomas Hardy, and John Masefield signed the document, which was published in The Times and the New York Tribune on 18 September 1914. As Samuel Hynes has noted: “no other war in England’s history had been defined and defended so quickly, and by writers of such stature” (1990, p. 27).

  7. 7.

    In addition to A Journal of Impressions, May Sinclair published six more novels that deal with the war.

  8. 8.

    In a sense, the texts written by Bennett, Conan Doyle, and Kipling give evidence of a particular feeling of enchantment towards the war in which the masculine ideal of heroism was a central element. This feeling and the rhetoric of masculinity and idealism was, as Andrew Frayn argues in Writing Disenchantment, “still current before and after the First World War” (2014, p. 11). See also Fletcher 2014 for further discussion on Victorian manliness and how the Great War put it to test.

  9. 9.

    The censoring policies did not allow the authors to be specific about the places they visited, which explains the scarcity of geographical references that appear in their texts.

  10. 10.

    The soldiers retired to these second-line camps to rest from the front.

  11. 11.

    Hazel Hutchison reminds us that Wharton was not only an object of observation for the soldiers, but also a matter of interest for the French general public. As Hermione Lee explains in Wharton’s biography, a cartoon of the author and Walter Berry appeared on the cover of one of the May 1915 issues of Le Rire Rouge. This gives evidence of the reputation that Wharton had achieved in France (see Hutchinson 2015, p. 80 and Lee 2007, pp. 484–486 for further information).

  12. 12.

    The first unit of Dr. Munro’s Flying Ambulance Corps was composed of Bert Bloxham, Marie Chisholm , Dorothie Feilding, Helen Gleason , Elsie Knocker, Dr. Reese, Dr. Shaw, May Sinclair, Rev. Fremlin Streatfeild, Robert Streatfeild, and Tom Worsfold (Atkinson 2010, p. 39).

  13. 13.

    The Aalst incident took place on 27 September 1914, right before the Belgian retreat from Antwerp. It included the execution of twenty Belgian civilians (Horne and Kramer 2001, p. 73).

  14. 14.

    In “Strategic Fictions?”, Andrew Griffiths questions Hynes’s assumptions on Buchan’s war writing and makes similar claims to the ones presented in this chapter. Whereas it is clear that Buchan was a propagandist, well-bred in the traditional rhetoric of war, Griffiths argues that his war texts also give evidence of an incipient fracture with the traditional rhetoric of war writing (see Griffiths 2016 for further information).

  15. 15.

    The French seventy-five cannon is one of the most emblematic guns of the First World War. It was designed by Colonel Albert Deport in 1894 and it was in use until the Second World War . The cannon was an innovation because it was the first weapon to include a mechanism that kept the gun’s trail and wheels still during the firing. As a consequence, the gun did not have to be re-aimed after shooting, allowing more rapid fire.

  16. 16.

    See Shover 1975 for further information on women’s imagery during the First World War.

  17. 17.

    Teresa Gómez Reus and Peter Lauber explore Wharton’s impressions of the havoc that the war was causing through the figure of anthropomorphised images of “murdered houses” and decapitated churches, (2008, pp. 207–210). In similar terms, Alice Kelly concludes in her introduction to a new edition of Fighting France that Wharton developed her “own method, where she circuitously avoids the wooden crosses—or the war dead—relating the scars through imagery of the landscape and physical environs” (2015, p. 21).

  18. 18.

    William Merrill Decker has pointed out in “Americans in Europe from Henry James to the Present” (2009) that for a traveller so familiar with the European continent, Wharton’s visit to the front “articulates moments of profound disorientation” (2009, p. 132).

  19. 19.

    As Hazel Hutchison argues, Wharton found it difficult to detach her own feelings and emotions from her descriptions, an aspect which is “both the strength and weakness” of her war essays (2015, p. 77).

  20. 20.

    Rinehart discovered after her visit to the frontline trenches that it had never been part of the original plan to take her that far and that the Belgian officer that had given the order had made a blunder.

  21. 21.

    See Prieto 2015 for further discussion on these images.

  22. 22.

    “A Journal of Impressions in Belgium by May Sinclair.” The North American Review 202 (720) (November 1915): 779–781.

  23. 23.

    See Buck 2005, p. 101; Forster 2008, pp. 231–234; Hynes 1990, pp. 92–94; Tylee 1990, p. 30, pp. 131–132 and Wilson 2001 for further reference.

  24. 24.

    Sinclair had already been experimenting with modernist techniques of narration before the war (Wilson 2003, p. 188).

Works Cited

Primary Sources

  • Bennett, Arnold. 1915. Over There: War Scenes on the Western Front. New York: George H. Doran Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conan Doyle, Arthur 1916. A Visit to Three Fronts: Glimpses of the British, the Italian and the French Lines. New York: George H. Doran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipling, Rudyard. 1915a. France at War. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinehart, Mary Roberts. 1915. Kings, Queens and Pawns: An American Woman at the Front. New York: George H. Doran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, May. 1915. A Journal of Impressions in Belgium. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, Edith. 1915/2010. Fighting France: From Dunkerque to Belport. London: Hesperus.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Atkinson, Diane. 2010. Elsie and Mairi Go to War: Two Extraordinary Women on the Western Front. London: Arrow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bataille, Georges. 1955/2003. Manet. Valencia: Institut Valencià d’Art Modern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird Wright, Sarah. 1997. Edith Wharton’s Travel Writing: The Making of a Connoisseur. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brassard, Geneviève. 2008. “War Is the Greatest of Paradoxes: May Sinclair and Edith Wharton at the Front.” Minerva Journal of Women and War 2 (1) (April 1): 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, Claire. 2005. “British Women’s Writing of the Great War.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Literature of the First World War, edited by Vincent Sherry, 85–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buitenhuis, Peter. 1989. The Great War of Words: Literature as Propaganda 1914–18 and After. London: Batsford Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Jan. 1980. Improbable Fiction: The Life of Mary Roberts Rinehart. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Sarah. 2003. Modernism, Male Friendship, and the First World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, William M. 2009. “Americans in Europe from Henry James to the Present.” In The Cambridge Companion to American Travel Writing, edited by Alfred Bendixen and Judith Hamer, 127144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deer, Patrick. 2009. Culture in Camouflage: War, Empire, and Modern British Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Arthur Conan. 1900. The Great Boer War. London: Smith, Elder & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Arthur Conan. 1902. The War in South Africa: Its Cause and Conduct. New York: McClure, Phillips & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Arthur Conan. 1916. The British Campaign in France and Flanders. London; Toronto: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Arthur Conan. 1924. Memories and Adventures. Boston: Little Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eksteins, Modris. 1989/2000. Rites of Spring: The Great War and the Birth of the Modern Age. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, Laurel. 2008. “Women and War Zones: May Sinclair’s Personal Negotiation with the First World War.” In Inside Out: Women Negotiating, Subverting, Appropriating Public and Private Space, edited by Teresa Gómez Reus and Aránzazu Usandizaga, 229248. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, Anthony. 2014. “Patriotism, the Great War and the Decline of Victorian Manliness.” History 99 (334): 40–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frayn, Andrew. 2014. Writing Disenchantment: British First World War Prose, 1914–30. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Dorothy, Judith Hattaway, and Jane Gledhill. 1995. Women Writers and the Great War. New York: Twayne Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Reus, Teresa. 2013. “Racing to the Front: Auto-mobility and Competing Narratives of Women in the First World War.” In Women in Transit through Literary Liminal Spaces, by Teresa Gómez Reus and Terry Gifford, 107124. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Reus, Teresa, and Peter Lauber. 2008. “In a Literary No Man’s Land: A Spatial Reading of Edith Wharton’s Fighting France.” In Inside Out: Women Negotiating, Subverting, Appropriating Public and Private Space, edited by Teresa Gómez Reus and Aránzazu Usandizaga, 205228. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieves, Keith. 1991. “Early Historical Responses to the Great War: Fortescue, Conan Doyle, and Buchan.” In The First World War and British Military History, edited by Brian Bond, 15–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, Andrew. 2016. “Strategic Fictions? John Buchan, The Times and the Ypres Salient.” In Literary Journalism and World War I. Marginal Voices, edited by Andrew Griffiths, Sara Prieto and Soenke Zehle. Nancy: Éditions Universitaires de Lorraine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haste, Cate. 1977. Keep the Home Fires Burning: Propaganda in the First World War. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, John N., and Alan Kramer. 2001. German Atrocities, 1914: A History of Denial. Yale: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, Hazel. 2015. The War That Used Up Words. American Writers and the First World War. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, Samuel. 1990/1992. A War Imagined: The First World War and English Culture. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, Anurag. 2009. “The Relationship between Ford, Kipling, Conan Doyle, Wells and British Propaganda of the First World War.” London: Queen Mary University.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Henry. 1914. Notes on Novelists, with Some Other Notes. New York: Charles Scribner’s sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Lucy, Zoë Kinsley, Terry Phillips, and Alan Roughley. 2007. Mapping Liminalities: Thresholds in Cultural and Literary Texts. Bern; New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Alice. 2015. “Introduction”. In Fighting France: From Dunkerque to Belfort, edited by Edith Wharton and Alice Kelly. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipling, Rudyard. 1915b. The Fringes of the Fleet. Doubleday: Page & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipling, Rudyard. 1915c. The New Army in Training. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipling, Rudyard. 1916. Sea Warfare. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipling, Rudyard. 1918. The Eyes of Asia. Doubleday: Page & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laski, Marghanita. 1987. From Palm to Pine: Rudyard Kipling Abroad and at Home. London: Sidwick & Jackson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold. 1927. Propaganda Technique in the World War. London; New York: Trubner and Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Hermione. 2007. Edith Wharton. London: Chatto & Windows.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leed, Eric J. 1979/2009. No Man’s Land: Combat & Identity in World War I. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, Kate. 2005. “Edith Wharton, War Correspondent.” Edith Wharton Review XXI (2): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Margot. 2000. Writing War in the Twentieth Century. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olin-Ammentorp, Julie. 2004. Edith Wharton’s Writings from the Great War. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Hesketh. 1943. Conan Doyle, His Life and Art. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, Jane. 2005. Boys in Khaki, Girls in Print: Women’s Literary Responses to the Great War, 1914–1918. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Alan. 1993. “Wharton Mobilizes Artists to Aid the War Homeless.” In Wretched Exotic: Essays on Edith Wharton in Europe, edited by Katherine Joslin and Alan Price, 219240. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto, Sara. 1915. “‘Without Methods’: Three Female Authors Visiting the Western Front.” First World War Studies 6 (2): 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475020.2015.1038842.

  • Raitt, Suzanna. 1999. “May Sinclair and the First World War.” Ideas 6 (2). http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/ideasv62/raitt.htm.

  • Raitt, Suzanna. 2000. May Sinclair: A Modern Victorian. New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinehart, Mary Roberts. 1908. The Circular Staircase. New York: Lester and Dunlap Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinehart, Mary Roberts. 1980. My Story: A New Edition and Seventeen New Years. New York: Amo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roby, Kinley E. 1972. A Writer at War: Arnold Bennett, 1914–1918. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, Andrew. 1999. Rudyard Kipling: War Stories and Poems. Oxford: Oxford Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Michael, and Philip M. Taylor. 1982. British Propaganda During the First World War, 1914–18. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, Edward. 1940. Rudyard Kipling: A Study in Literature and Political Ideas. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shover, Michel J. 1975. “Roles and Images of Women in World War I Propaganda.” Politics & Society. December, 5: 469–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmadge, John E. 1968. Corra Harris: Lady of Purpose. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Philip M. 1980. “The Foreign Office and British Propaganda During the First World War.” The Historical Journal 23 (4): 875–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, Luke. 2014. “Clouds and Power: May Sinclair’s War.” Journal of Modern Literature 37 (3): 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Victor W. 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylee, Claire M. 1990. The Great War and Women’s Consciousness: Images of Militarism and Womanhood in Women’s Writings, 1914–64. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, Christopher. 1998/2007. The Writer’s Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers. Studio City, CA: Michael Wiese Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, Edith. 1908. A Motor-flight Through France. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, Edith. 1920. In Morocco. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, Edith. 1934. A Backward Glance. New York: Appleton Century Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Leigh G. 2001. “May Sinclair.” The Literary Encyclopedia. http://www.litencyc.com/php/speople.php?rec=true&UID=4086.

  • Wilson, Leigh G. 2003. “‘She in Her “Armour” and He in His Coat of Nerves’: May Sinclair and the Re-writing of Chivalry.” In Feminist Forerunners: New Womanism and Feminism in the Early Twentieth Century, edited by Ann Heilmann, 179–188. London: Pandora.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Prieto, S. (2018). The Liminal Tunnel: Authorial Voices in the War Zone. In: Reporting the First World War in the Liminal Zone. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68594-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68594-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68593-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68594-6

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics