Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Promoting the General Welfare of Society”: The Political Activity of Social Workers and Human Service Organizations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Social Work

  • 82k Accesses

Abstract

Social workers are politically active both as individuals and as part of larger groups and organizations. This chapter provides an overview of social workers’ current and past political activity, as well as factors that encourage or limit social workers, our profession, and our employers from engaging in the political process. We consider relevant legal issues that guide organizations’ political activities and learn about rules that may apply to individual field placements or employers. Relevant theories and models are used to create a picture of social workers’ political involvement, both individually and collectively. Political knowledge, skills, interest, efficacy, and mobilization and their influences on social workers’ political activity are discussed, as readers are asked to reflect on political activities in which they have participated and potential future political activity. Activities include a political knowledge quiz and a survey that allows readers to compare their political efficacy with other social workers and the American public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alinksy, S. (1971). Rules for radicals. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. L., Wells, C., & Rank, A. (2009). Young citizens and civic learning: Two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age. Citizenship Studies, 13(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020902731116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, G. S. (1972). A theory of political ambition: Career choices and the role of structural incentives. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 144–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouillette, R. (2016, March 15). Why therapists should talk politics. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casellas, J. P. (2011). Latinas in legislatures. Aztlán: A Journal of Chicano Studies, 36(1), 171–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56, 76–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. K. (2010). Voting as empowerment practice. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 13, 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doan, A. E., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2010). The role of intersectional stereotypes on evaluations of gay and lesbian political candidates. Politics & Gender, 6(1), 63–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domanski, M. D. (1998). Prototypes of social work political participation: An empirical model. Social Work, 43(2), 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, R. G., & Peterson, N. (2017). Making black lives matter. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(1), 341–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagan, K., Stolzenberg, E., Bates, A., Aragon, M., Suchard, M., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2015). The American freshman: national norms fall 2015. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezell, M. (1993). The political activity of social workers: A post-Reagan update. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 20(4), 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felderhoff, B. J., Hoefer, R., & Watson, L. D. (2015). Living up to the Code’s exhortations? Social workers’ political knowledge sources, expectations, and behaviors. Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swv053.

  • Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., Douglas, C., et al. (2005). Development and validation of the Political Skill Inventory. Journal of Management, 31(1), 126–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. (1995). Political social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 31(2), 194–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider-Markel, D. P., Miller, P., Flores, A., Lewis, D. C., Tadlock, B. L., & Taylor, J. (2017). Bringing “T” to the table: Understanding individual support of transgender candidates for public office. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D., & Fauri, D. (2001). Social workers’ political participation: Strengthening the political confidence of social work students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(2), 321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, D. R. (2004). Who we are, where we come from, and some of our perceptions: Comparison of social workers and the general population. Social Work, 42(9), 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, D. (2011). Political psychology. In T. Ishiyama & M. Breuning (Eds.), 21st century political science: A reference handbook (pp. 51–59). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, L. P., Villanueva, B. P., Guarneros, N., Vélez, V. N., & Solórzano, D. G. (2014). DACAmented in California: The impact of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program on Latina/os. In C. A. Noriega (Ed.), CSRC. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylton, M. (2015). Civic engagement and civic literacy among social work students: Where do we stand? Journal of Policy Practice, 14(3/4), 292–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2015.1004396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Internal Revenue Service. (2017). “Direct” and “grass roots” lobbying defined. Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/direct-and-grass-roots-lobbying-defined.

  • Jacoby, W. G. (2009). Ideology and vote choice in the 2004 election. Electoral Studies, 28, 584–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahne, J., & Westheimer, J. (2006). The limits of political efficacy: Educating citizens for a democratic society. PS: Political Science and Politics, 39(2), 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, S. R., & Humphreys, N. A. (2011). Social workers in politics: A national survey of social work candidates and elected officials. Journal of Policy Practice, 10, 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, S. R., & Humphreys, N. A. (2015). Gender and social workers’ political activity. Affilia: Journal of Women & Social Work, 30(2), 232–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J. L., (2015). Female candidates and legislators. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J. L., & Fox, R. L. (2005). It takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LeRoux, K. (2011). Examining implementation of the National Voter Registration Act by nonprofit organizations: An institutional explanation. The Policy Studies Journal, 39(4), 565–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeRoux, K. (2014). Social justice and the role of nonprofit human service organizations in amplifying client voice. In M. J. Austin (Ed.), Social justice and social work: Rediscovering a core value of the profession (pp. 325–338). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marschall, M., Ruhil, A. V., & Shah, P. (2010). The new racial calculus: Electoral institutions and black representation in local legislatures. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mary, N. L. (2001). Political activism of social work educators. Journal of Community Practice, 9(4), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, A. M. (2008). Civic engagement. In Encyclopedia of social work (20th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, A. M., Sherraden, M., & Pritzker, S. (2006). Civic engagement among low-income and low-wealth families: In their words. Family Relations, 55, 152–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2013). Political interventions. In Encyclopedia of social work. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncreif, G. F., Squire, P., & Jewell, M. E. (2001). Who runs for the legislature? Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosley, J. E. (2013a). The beliefs of homeless service managers about policy advocacy: Definitions, legal understanding and motivations to participate. Administration in Social Work, 37, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosley, J. E. (2013b). Recognizing new opportunities: Conceptualizing policy advocacy in everyday organizational practice. Social Work, 58(3), 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Social Workers. (2003). Demographics: Practice research network. Washington, DC: NASW.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Social Workers. (2016). NASW CEO McClain sends holiday message, response to Trump presidency. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRnlvEP2QAU.

  • National Association of Social Workers. (2017). Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Social Workers. (n.d.). History of the NASW Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/nasw/ethics/ethicshistory.asp.

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). The nation’s report card: 2014 civics assessment. Retrieved February 16, 2017, from https://nationsreportcard.gov/hgc_2014/ -civics

  • National Community Land Trust Network. (n.d.). Advocacy vs. lobbying. Retrieved from http://cltnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Advocacy-vs-Lobbying-1-28-14-final.pdf.

  • National Conference of State Legislators. (2015). Staff and political activity—statutes. Retrieved May 2, 2017, from http://www.ncsl.org/research/ethics/50statetablestaffandpoliticalactivitystatutes.aspx.

  • National Council of Nonprofits. (2000). Words matter; The power of language; Government” words. Retrieved from https://www.councilofnonprofits.org/words-matter - sthash.98OnUnYi.dpuf.

  • National Institutes of Health. NIH Ethics Program. (2013). Lobbying activities. Retrieved from February 15, 2017, from https://ethics.od.nih.gov/topics/lobbying.htm

  • Ostrander, J. A. (2016). To participate or not to participate, that is the question: A critical phenomenological study of clinical social workers and their political participation. Doctoral dissertations, University of Connecticut, 1296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, T. (2013). The American democracy (11th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, E. J., & Flynn, J. P. (1990). Executive directors’ political activities. Social Work, 35(4), 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2014). Beyond red vs. blue: The political typology. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from http://www.people-press.org/2014/06/26/the-political-typology-beyond-red-vs-blue/.

  • Pew Research Center. (2015). A deep dive into party affiliation. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2015/04/07/a-deep-dive-into-party-affiliation/.

  • Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1977). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, F. F., & Minnite, L. C. (2013). Voter education. In Encyclopedia of Social Work: New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Political activities by certain public entities and individuals. (n.d.). Texas Government Code.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritzker, S. (2012). Pathways to adolescent political participation across race and ethnicity. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 22(7), 801–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritzker, S., & Burwell, C. (2016). Promoting election-related policy practice among social work students. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(4), 434–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritzker, S., & Garza, G. (2017). Sanders, Clinton, Trump: Social work students’ political engagement in 2016. Paper presented at the Policy Conference 2.0, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritzker, S., Springer, M., & McBride, A. M. (2015). Learning to vote: Influencing political participation among college students. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 8(1), 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railey, H., & Brennan, J. (2016). The Civics Education Initiative 2015–2016. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggle, E. D., & Tadlock, B. L. (1999). Gays and lesbians in the democratic process: Public policy, public opinion, and political representation, New York, NY, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J. (2006). An empirical study evaluating the political participation of licensed social workers in the United States: A multi-state study. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J. (2007). Evaluating the political participation of licensed social workers in the new millenium. Journal of Policy Practice, 6(4), 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J. (2008). A national study predicting licensed social workers levels of political participation: The role of resources, psychological engagement, and recruitment networks. Social Work, 53(4), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/53.4.347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, C., Poe, B., & Thomas, V. (2010). Political activities of social workers: Addressing perceived barriers to political participation. Social Work, 55(4), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/55.4.317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockaway, C. (2011). Campaigns. In J. T. Ishiyama & M. Breuning (Eds.), 21st century political science: A reference handbook (pp. 796–804). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rome, S. H., & Hoechstetter, S. (2010). Social work and civic engagement: The political participation of professional social workers. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 37, 107–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S. M. (1990). Advocacy/empowerment: An approach to clinical practice for social work. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 17(2), 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenwald, M. (2006). Exploring the political ideologies of licensed social workers. Social Work Research, 30(2), 121–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, P. (2014). It takes a black candidate: A supply-side theory of minority representation. Political Research Quarterly, 67(2), 266–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sisk, A. (2016, September 10). In victory for protesters, Obama administration halts North Dakota pipeline. National Public Radio.

    Google Scholar 

  • State of Connecticut Office of State Ethics. (2012). Client lobbyist guide to the Code of Ethics. Retrieved from http://www.ct.gov/ethics/lib/ethics/guid.

  • State of Connecticut Office of State Ethics. (n.d.). Researching lobbyists registered in Connecticut. Retrieved from https://www.cga.ct.gov/lib/documents/Researching%20lobbyists%20registered%20in%20Connecticut.pdf

  • Swank, E. W. (2012). Predictors of political activism among social work students. Journal of Social Work Education, 48(2), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.5175/jswe.2012.200900111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, C. R. (1998). Clinical social work’s contribution to a social justice perspective. Social Work, 43(6), 527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. J. (1994). Social workers and politics: Beyond the Hatch Act. Social Work, 39(4), 457–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2015). About the National Voter Registration Act. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from https://www.justice.gov/crt/about-national-voter-registration-act.

  • U.S. Federal Labor Relations Authority. (n.d.). Ethics rules for special government employees (SGEs). Retrieved May 2, 2017, from https://www.flra.gov/Ethics_Rules_for_SGE

  • U.S. Office of Special Counsel. (n.d.a). Congress allows most state and local public employees to run for partisan office. Retrieved May 2, 2017, from https://osc.gov/Resources/Hatch%20Act%20Modernization%20Act%20Guidance%20for%20State%20and%20Local%20Employees.pdf

  • U.S. Office of Special Counsel. (n.d.b. How does the Hatch Act affect me. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from https://osc.gov/pages/hatchact-affectsme.aspx.

  • United Nations General Assembly. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/english/law/pdf/crc.pdf.

  • United States Department of Justice. (2016). The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA). Retieved from https://www.justice.gov/crt/national-voter-registration-act-1993-nvra.

  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolk, J. L. (1981). Are social workers politically active? Social Work, 26(4), 283–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Delli Carpini, M. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Work, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY, USA

    Shannon R. Lane

  2. Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA

    Suzanne Pritzker

Authors
  1. Shannon R. Lane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suzanne Pritzker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lane, S.R., Pritzker, S. (2018). “Promoting the General Welfare of Society”: The Political Activity of Social Workers and Human Service Organizations. In: Political Social Work. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68588-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68588-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68587-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68588-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation