Abstract
The shakuhachi () came to Japan in the seventh century from China as a six-holed flute used in Imperial Court music. In the middle ages, mendicant komusō Zen monks, wishing to be delivered from earthly desires by blowing zen “suizen” (), transformed the shakuhachi into the five-holed flute played today. Honkyoku are the songs created by these monks. The name shakuhachi () means “1.8 shaku,” and refers to its size. It is a compound of two words: () means “shaku,” an archaic unit of width equal to 30.3 cm (0.994 English feet) and subdivided in ten subunits and hachi (), which means “eight,” here “eight sun or tenths” of a shaku. The shakuhachi world is divided up among various schools, called ryu, most commonly the Tozan-, Meian- or Myoan- and Kinko-ryu. The Tozan-ryu, which utilizes western notions of rhythm and structure is built on an iemoto structure, with the head of the organization defining the values and styles of the school. The Meian- or Myoan-ryu is often associated with the Fuke Zen sect and traditionally employs the shakuhachi for spiritual reasons. The Kinko-ryu focuses on a combination of both komusō related honkyoku as well as modern music. In this chapter, I describe the historical background and performance techniques associated with my work as an accredited master (shihan) performer of the shakuhachi. I reflect on how shakuhachi music has evolved across time and how cultural memory and perceived historical truths often conflict. I also describe some of my own experiences as a student of shakuhachi, and the array of complex techniques and considerations required for a performance of a program of selected shakuhachi repertoire that was mastered through many years of intensive training.
Notes
- 1.
The standard length is one shaku eight (hachi ) sun (1/10 of a shaku) (approximately 54 cm) and is formally called ishaku hassun . It contains a sharp blowing-edge called an utaguchi at the blowing end, five finger holes––four on the front, one on the back.
- 2.
Fuyo Hisamatsu (1781–1871) indicated that “39 pieces lie within 36 pieces. 36 pieces lie within 18 pieces. 18 pieces lie within 3 pieces. 3 pieces lie within one piece. One piece lies within no piece. [No piece lies within a breath.] A breath lies within nothingness” (1985).
- 3.
For more on sankyoku, see also Simura and Tokumaru (2001).
- 4.
For more on Renzai Zen, see Jørn Borup, Japanese Rinzai Zen Buddhism: Myōshinji, a Living Religion (Leiden: Brill, 2008), Discovery eBooks, EBSCOhost (accessed March 17, 2014).
- 5.
An early exhaustive study was conducted on the Charter of 1614 in Mikami Sanji, “Fukeshu ni tsuite,” Shigaku Zasshi 13/4 (1902): 61–76, and 13/5 (1902): 64–82.
- 6.
For more on this, see Morihide Yamamoto, Kyotaku Denki Kokuji Kai (Kyoto: Kōto Shōrin, 1795/R Tokyo: Nihon ongaku sha, 1981.
- 7.
For a translation of the Kyotaku Denki, see Tsuge 1977, 49–53.
- 8.
Nakatsuka Chikuzen (1979) writes that seventy-seven Fuke temples dotted Japan during the Edo period––the most important being the Myōanji in Kyoto and Ichigetsuji and Reihōji in the Kanto region of present day Tokyo (95–102; see also Olafsson 2003).
- 9.
Ennin founded the monastery at Tōfuku-ji , a Buddhist temple complex in Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto, in the seventeenth century where komusō set up a sub-temple called Myōan-ji , sometimes referred to as “The Temple of Light and Dark.”
- 10.
Wallmark (2012) considers the shakuhachi in relation to Julia Kristeva’s theory of abjection. He summarizes her theory of abjection as “a virulent species of exclusion and division, a strategy for demarcating the bounded self in relationship to the exterior, dangerous other” (1). Furthermore, he quotes Kristeva on the philosophy of Buddhism––“division does not order chaos; it simply disturbs wholeness and denies the natural transience of all things. In eschewing good-bad judgements, Buddhism moves the practitioner away from cravings and away from disgust” (as quoted in Wallmark 2012; see Kristeva 1982, 166). It must be noted that many ethnomusicologists and certainly, many shakuhachi players take issue with applying Western theoretical paradigms to non-Western music.
- 11.
Chikuzen never mentioned that tsuki as an option, but other sources including Nitschke (1996) indicate this possibility.
References
Blasdel, Christopher. The Single Tone: A Personal Journey into Shakuhachi Music. Tokyo: Printed Matter Press, 2005.
Borup, Jørn. Japanese Rinzai Zen Buddhism: Myōshinji, a Living Religion. Leiden: Brill, 2008. Discovery eBooks, EBSCOhost (accessed March 17, 2014).
Day, Kiku. “Changes in the Construction of the Jinashi Shakuhachi in the Late 20th and Early 21st Centuries.” European Shakuhachi Society Journal 1 (2011): 62–85.
DeCoker, Gary and Norinaga, Fujiwara. “Secret Teachings in Medieval Calligraphy. Jubokushōand Saiyōshō.” Nipponica Monumenta 43/3 (1988): 259–278.
Draper, Paul and Kim Cunio. “The ‘little r’ in Artistic Research Training.” In Research and Research Education in Music Performance Pedagogy, 105–118. New York: Springer, 2014.
Hahn, Tomie. Sensational Knowledge: Embodying Culture through Japanese Dance. Wesleyan University Press, 2007.
Hisamatsu, Fuyo. “The Hitori Mondo of Hisamatsu Fuyo.” Translated by R. Hartshorne and K. Tanahashi. Annals of the International Shakuhachi Society 1 (1985): 41–46. http://www.komuso.com/people/people.pl?person=105&lang=39 (accessed on March 18, 2014).
Keister, Jay. “The Shakuhachi as Spiritual Tool: A Japanese Buddhist Instrument in the West.” Asian Music 35/2 (2004): 99–131.
Komparu, Kunio. The Noh Theatre: Principles and Perspectives. Tokyo: Tankosha; New York: John Weatherhill, 1983.
Kristeva, Julia. Powers of Horror: An Essay in Abjection. Translated by Leon S. Raudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.
Kurihara, Kōtaro. Shakuhachi-shi kō. Tokyo: Chikuyūsha, 1975 (reprint of 1918 edition).
Lee, Riley. “Yearning for the Bell: A Study of Transmission in the Shakuhachi Honykoku Tradition.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawai’I, 1982.
Lee, Riley. “San’ya (Dokyoku).” www.komuso.com (accessed on October 15, 2013).
Linder, Gunnar Jinmei. Notes on Kinko-ryu Shakuhachi Honkyoku: Performance Techniques: Analysis, Classification, Explanation. Lidingö: Nipponicom.com, 2010.
Malm, William. Traditional Japanese Music and Musical Instruments. The New Edition originally published by Charles E. Tuttle Company under the title Japanese Music and Musical Instruments, 1959. Tokyo, New York, and London: Kodansha International, 2000 (1959).
Malm, William. Six Hidden Views of Japanese Music. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.
Matsunobu, Koji. “Artful Encounters with Nature: Ecological and Spiritual Dimensions of Music Learning.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne, 2009.
Matsunobu, Koji. “From Art as Stained Glass to Art as Mirror: Addressing a Holistic View of Education.” Harvard Educational Review 83/1 (2013a): 147–149.
Matsunobu, Koji. “Performing, Creating, and Listening to Nature through Music: The Art of Self-Integration.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 47/4 (2013b): 64–79.
McCollum, Jonathan and David Hebert. Theory and Method in Historical Ethnomusicology. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2014.
Nakazuka, Chikuzen. “Kinko-ryū shakuhachi shikan.” Sankyoku (1936–39): 172–208 (reprinted with the addition of authors Kenji Hirano and Yūkō Kamisangō Tokyo: Nihon Ongakusha, 1979).
Nishiyama, Matsunosuke. Iemoto no kenykū. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1982 (originally published: Tokyo: Azekura Shobō, 1959.
Nitschke, Giinter. “‘Ma’: The Japanese Sense of ‘Place’ in Old and New Architecture and Planning.” Architectural Design 36/3 (1966): 116–156.
Olafsson, Torsten. “Early Seventeenth-Century Ascetic Shakuhachi Ideology: The Kaidō Honsoku. A Komosō’s Fuke Shakuhachi Credo. Dated 1628.” MA thesis, University of Copenhagen, 1987/R 2003, 1.
Olafsson, Torsten. The Zen Shakuhachi Truth Research Web Pages. http://zen-shakuhachi.dk/tokeichouokitegaki.htm (accessed December 16, 2017).
Ōnuku, Tasiko. “Sōkyoku: Chamber Music for Koto.” Garland Encyclopedia of World Music Volume 7: East Asia: China, Japan, and Korea, edited by Robert Provine, Yosihiko Tokumaru and Lawrence Witzleben, 1182–1184. New York: Routledge, 2001.
Robinson, Richard H. “Buddhism: in China and Japan.” In Encyclopedia of the World’s Religions. New York: Barnes & Nobles Books, 1997, 318–341.
Rowell, Lewis. Thinking About Music. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1985.
Saeki, Junko. Yūjo no bunkashi : hare no onnatachi / Saeki Junko cho. n.p.: Tōkyō : Chūō Kōronsha, 1987. Harvard Library Bibliographic Dataset, EBSCOhost (accessed March 17, 2014).
Sanford, James H. “Shakuhachi Zen. The Fukeshu and Komuso.” Monumenta Nipponica 32/4 (1977): 411–440.
Sanji, Mikami. “Fukeshū ni tsuite.” Shigaku Zasshi 13/4 (1902): 61–76, and 13/5 (1902): 64–82.
Silk, Jonathan A. “What, If Anything, Is Mahāyāna Buddhism? Problems of Definitions and Classifications.” Numen 4 (2002): 355–405.
Simura, Satosi, and Tokumaru, Yoshiko. “Chamber Music for Sankyoku Ensembles.” Garland Encyclopedia of World Music Volume 7: East Asia: China, Japan, and Korea, edited by Robert Provine, Yosihiko Tokumaru and Lawrence Witzleben, 1185–1187. New York: Routledge, 2001.
Smith, Joshua M. “Individual and Collective Identities of Shakuhachi Players.” The New York Sociologist 3 (2008): 45–67.
Steineck, Christian. “Time is Not Fleeting: Thoughts of a Medieval Zen Buddhist.” KronoScope 7 (2007): 33–47.
Taniguchi, Yoshinobu and Kinchi Tsurata. Sokkan: Chikuzen Shakuhachi Series. Vol. 3. Tai Hei Shakuhachi–CSS–1, 2001.
Taniguchi, Yoshinobu and Kinchi Tsurata. Tamuek: Chikuzen Shakuhachi Series. Vol. 4. Tai Hei Shakuhachi–CSS–1, 2001.
The International Shakuhachi Society. http://www.komosu.com (accessed on March 18, 2014).
Tokuyama, Takashi. Hi Kyoku [Shakuhachi honkyoku]. Chiku-On-Ki: None, 1987.
Tsuge, Gen’ichi, trans. “The History of the Kyotaku.” Asian Music 8/2 (1977): 47–63.
Tsukitani, Tsuneko. “Fukeshakuhachi no genjo to kadai (Shakuhachi Research: Examining the Result).” Bulletin of Osaka University of Arts 4 (1977): 50–60.
Tsukitani, Tsuneko. Shakuhachi Koten-honkyoku no Kenkyū [A Study of Classical (koten) Fundamental Pieces (honkyoku) for Shakuhachi]. Tokyo: Shuppan Geijutsusha, 2000.
Tsukitani, Tsuneko. “The Shakuhachi and its Music,” translated by Charles Rowe. In The Ashgate Research Companion to Japanese Music, edited by Alison McQueen Tokita and David W. Hughs, 145-68. Surrey, England: Ashgate, 2008.
Uramoto, Setcho. Shakuhachi honkyoku to kokan shakuhachi o aikosareta Uramoto Setcho Sensei. Tokyo: Inagaki Ihaku; toriatsukaijo Komuso Kenkyuakai, 1985.
Wallmark, Zachary. “Sacred Abjection in Zen Honkyoku.” Ethnomusicology Review (2012). http://ethnomusicologyreview.ucla.edu/journal/volume/17/piece/585 (retrieved August 12, 2015).
Weisgarber, Eliott. “The Honkyoku of the Kinko-Ryu: Some Principles of Its Organization.” Ethnomusicology 12/3 (1968): 313–344.
Yokoyama, Katsuya. Japanese Traditional Music. OGM-1003, 1985.
Yokoyama, Katsuya. Japon L'art du shakuhachi. Ocora France–C560114, 1997.
Zong, Desheng. “Three Language-Related Methods in Early Chinese Chan Buddhism.” Philosophy East & West 55/4 (2005): 584–602.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Text of “charter of 1614” Enacted in 1614 by the First Tokugawa Shōgun, Tokugawa Ieyasu (1543–1616) [Original Text and Modern Text ]
[Keichō no Okitegaki] (most often cited as the Charter of 1614)
[Gonyūkoku no Watasaseraresōrō Osadamegaki ] (as cited in Sanford 1977)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCollum, J. (2018). Embodying History and Pedagogy: A Personal Journey into the Dokyoku Style of Japanese Shakuhachi. In: Hebert, D. (eds) International Perspectives on Translation, Education and Innovation in Japanese and Korean Societies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68434-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68434-5_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68432-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68434-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)