Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Social/Neuroscience: Bridging or Polarizing Culture and Biology?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neuroscience and Social Science

Abstract

We review contemporary research on self-regulation in experimental psychology and social neuroscience in order to evaluate its conceptual foundations and discuss how theoretical assumptions about the biological dimension of this phenomenon are constructed in the crossfields of psychology and neuroscience. We argue that such a dimension is predominantly understood as a determining factor of behavior itself rooted in life structures and processes, although bearing on a restricted conception of life, characterized by dualistic, individualistic, aprioristic, adaptationistic, and anthropocentric limitations. We discuss these five features of the discursive construction of the biological dimension, building on literature reviews and critical discussions of three case examples. The focus is, first, on self-regulation theoretical models, then on emotion regulation models, and finally on attention regulation. In particular, we identify problems regarding different notions of autonomy widely at play across biological to social sciences. We argue that such a theoretical limitation compromises the link between theories of culture and biology, eventually radicalizing the very gap that the social neurosciences seek to overcome, and polarizing the relationships between biomedical discourses and psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cacioppo JT, Berntson GG. Social psychological contributions to the decade of the brain. Doctrine of multilevel analysis. Am Psychol. 1992;47(8):1019–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eberl JT. Aquinas on the nature of human beings. Rev Metaphys. 2004;58(2):333–65.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heatherton TF. Neuroscience of self and self-regulation. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:363–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kant I, Friedman M. Metaphysical foundations of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Baker B. The hunt for disability: the new eugenics and the normalization of school children. Teach Coll Rec. 2002;104(4):663–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carver CS, Scheier MF. Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality–social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychol Bull. 1982;92(1):111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baumeister RF, Muraven M, Tice DM. Ego depletion: a resource model of volition, self-regulation, and controlled processing. Soc Cogn. 2000;18(2):130–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bauer IM, Baumeister RF. Self-regulatory strength. In: Handbook of self-regulation: research, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press; 2011. p. 64–82.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carver CS, Lawrence JW, Scheier MF. Self-discrepancies and affect: incorporating the role of feared selves. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1999;25(7):783–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Higgins ET. Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychol Rev. 1987;94(3):319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. vanDellen MR, Hoyle RH. Possible selves as behavioral standards in self-regulation. Self Identity. 2008;7:295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Morf CC, Horvath S. Self-regulation processes and their signatures. In: Handbook of personality and self-regulation. New York: Wiley; 2010. p. 115–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Burnette JL, O’boyle EH, VanEpps EM, Pollack JM, Finkel EJ. Mind-sets matter: a meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychol Bull. 2013;139:655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hagger MS, Wood C, Stiff C, Chatzisarantis NL. Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2010;136:495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gestsdottir S, Lerner RM. Positive development in adolescence: the development and role of intentional self-regulation. Hum Dev. 2008;51(3):202–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vohs KD, Baumeister RF, Schmeichel BJ. Erratum to “Motivation, personal beliefs, and limited resources all contribute to self-control” [J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48 (2012) 943–947]. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013;49(1):184–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baumeister RF. The unity of self at the interface of the animal body and the cultural system. Psychol Stud. 2011;56(1):5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fitzsimons GM, Finkel EJ. Interpersonal influences on self-regulation. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010;19(2):101–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ent MR, Baumeister RF, Vonasch AJ. Power, leadership, and self-regulation. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2012;6(8):619–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Amodio DM. Self-regulation in intergroup relations: A social neuroscience framework. In: Social neuroscience: toward understanding the underpinnings of the social mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 101–22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Devine PG. Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;56(1):5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Botvinick M, Nystrom LE, Fissell K, Carter CS, Cohen JD. Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature. 1999;402(6758):179–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carter CS, Braver TS, Barch DM, Botvinick MM, Noll D, Cohen JD. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science. 1998;280(5364):747–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Veen V, Carter CS. The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002;14(4):593–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Amodio DM, Harmon-Jones E, Devine PG, Curtin JJ, Hartley SL, Covert AE. Neural signals for the detection of unintentional race bias. Psychol Sci. 2004;15(2):88–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Amodio DM, Kubota JT, Harmon-Jones E, Devine PG. Alternative mechanisms for regulating racial responses according to internal vs external cues. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2006;1(1):26–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gross JJ. Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(1):224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gross JJ. Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gross JJ, Barrett LF. Emotion generation and emotion regulation: one or two depends on your point of view. Emot Rev. 2011;3(1):8–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lazarus RS. Cognition and motivation in emotion. Am Psychol. 1991;46(4):352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mauss IB, Bunge SA, Gross JJ. Automatic emotion regulation. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2007;1(1):146–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Koole SL, Coenen LHM. Implicit self and affect regulation: effects of action orientation and subliminal self priming in an affective priming task. Self Identity. 2007;6(2-3):118–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ochsner KN, Gross JJ. Cognitive emotion regulation: insights from social cognitive and affective neuroscience. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008;17(2):153–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Goldin PR, McRae K, Ramel W, Gross JJ. The neural bases of emotion regulation: reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;63(6):577–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kappas A. Emotion and regulation are one! Emot Rev. 2011;3(1):17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Volokhov RN, Demaree HA. Spontaneous emotion regulation to positive and negative stimuli. Brain Cogn. 2010;73(1):1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tamir M. What do people want to feel and why? Pleasure and utility in emotion regulation. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009;18(2):101–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tamir M, Ford BQ. When feeling bad is expected to be good: emotion regulation and outcome expectancies in social conflicts. Emotion. 2012;12:807–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Beckes L, Coan JA. Social baseline theory: the role of social proximity in emotion and economy of action. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2011;5(12):976–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Trommsdorff G. Development of “agentic” regulation in cultural context: the role of self and world views. Child Dev Perspect. 2012;6(1):19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Novin S, Banerjee R, Dadkhah A, Rieffe C. Self-reported use of emotional display rules in the Netherlands and Iran: evidence for sociocultural influence. Soc Dev. 2009;18(2):397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Davis E, Greenberger E, Charles S, Chen C, Zhao L, Dong Q. Emotion experience and regulation in China and the United States: how do culture and gender shape emotion responding? Int J Psychol. 2012;47(3):230–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Miyamoto Y, Ma X. Dampening or savoring positive emotions: a dialectical cultural script guides emotion regulation. Emotion. 2011;11(6):1346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Baumeister RF, Schmeichel BJ, Vohs KD. Self-regulation and the executive function: the self as controlling agent. In: Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, editors. Social psychology: handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford Press; 2007. p. 516–39.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Tice DM. The strength model of self-control. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16(6):351–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Carver CS, Scheier MF. Self-regulation of action and affect. In: In: Handbook of self-regulation: research, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press; 2011. p. 13–39.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Posner MI, Rothbart MK, Sheese BE, Tang Y. The anterior cingulate gyrus and the mechanism of self-regulation. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007;7(4):391–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Baumeister RF, Heatherton TF. Self-regulation failure: an overview. Psychol Inq. 1996;7(1):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez ML. Delay of gratification in children. Science. 1989;244(4907):933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. McPherson GE, Zimmerman BJ. Self-regulation of musical learning. In: The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning: a project of the Music Educators National Conference. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 327–47.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Duckworth AL, Seligman MEP. Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychol Sci. 2005;16(12):939–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Heatherton TF, Wagner DD. Cognitive neuroscience of self-regulation failure. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(3):132–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Baumeister RF, Heatherton TF, Tice DM. Losing control: how and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego: Academic press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T. A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers. 2004;72(2):271–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wyland CL, Kelley WM, Macrae CN, Gordon HL, Heatherton TF. Neural correlates of thought suppression. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(14):1863–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Richeson JA, Shelton JN. When prejudice does not pay effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychol Sci. 2003;14(3):287–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Blair C. Behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation in young children: relations with self-regulation and adaptation to preschool in children attending head start. Dev Psychobiol. 2003;42(3):301–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Haye AA. Living being and speaking being: toward a dialogical approach to intentionality. Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2008;42(2):157–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lamperd B. ADHD:‘truth discourse with a vengeance’. Australas J Am Stud. 2009:28(1):74–92.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Barkley RA. International consensus statement on ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41(12):1389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Rose N. The politics of life itself: biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Oxford: Princeton University Press; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  63. Conrad P. The medicalization of society: on the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Baltimore: JHU Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Clarke AE, Shim JK, Mamo L, Fosket JR, Fishman JR. Biomedicalization: technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. Am Sociol Rev. 2003;68(2):161–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Foucault M, Martin LH, Gutman H, Hutton PH. Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Foucault M, Lagrange J, Burchell G. Psychiatric power: lectures at the college de france, 1973–1974, vol. 1. New York: Macmillan; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  67. Foucault M. The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. New York: Picador; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Foucault M. The courage of the truth (the government of self and others II): lectures at the Collège de France, 1983-1984. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Bianchi E. Diagnósticos psiquiátricos infantiles, biomedicalización y DSM: ¿hacia una nueva normalidad? Rev Latinoam Ciencias Soc Niñez y Juv. 2016;14(1):417–30.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Leavy P. “¿ Trastorno o mala educación?” Reflexiones desde la antropología de la niñez sobre un caso de TDAH en el ámbito escolar. Rev Latinoam Ciencias Soc Niñez y Juv. 2013;11(2):675–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Bianchi E. La perspectiva teórico-metodológica de Foucault. Algunas notas para investigar al “ ADHD”. Rev Latinoam Ciencias Soc Niñez y Juv. 2010;8(1):43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Solovieva Y, Mata A, Rojas LQ. Vías de corrección alternativa para el trastorno de déficit de atención en la edad preescolar. Rev CES Psicol. 2014;7(1):95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Van Kuyk JJ. Holistic or sequential approach to curriculum: what works best for young children? Rev Latinoam Ciencias Soc Niñez y Juv. 2009;7(2):949–69.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Quintanar L. Los trastornos del aprendizaje: Aproximación histórico-cultural. In: Quintanar RL, Eslava-Cobos J, editors. Los trastor del aprendiz perspect neuropsicol Puebla Coop Editor Magisterio. Puebla: Inst Colomb Neurociencias, Benemérita Univ Autónoma Puebla; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Luria AR. Human brain and psychological processes. New York: Harper & Row; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Luria AR. Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books/Consultants Bureau; 1980.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  77. Ryan RM, Kuhl J, Deci EL. Nature and autonomy: an organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development. Dev Psychopathol. 1997;9(4):701–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Lock M, Scheper-Hughes N. A critical-interpretive approach in medical anthropology: rituals and routines of discipline and dissent. In: Medical anthropology: contemporary theory and method, vol. 3; 1990. p. 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Lock M. Cultivating the body: anthropology and epistemologies of bodily practice and knowledge. Annu Rev Anthropol. 1993;22(1):133–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Blair C, Raver CC. School readiness and self-regulation: a developmental psychobiological approach. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015;66:711–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Petersen SE, Posner MI. The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;35:73–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Kelley WM, Wagner DD, Heatherton TF. In search of a human self-regulation system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2015;38:389–411.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Mayr E. The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Rosenberg A. The structure of biological science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  85. Collier J. Self-organization, individuation and identity. Rev Int Philos. 2004;2:151–72.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Varela F. Principles of biological autonomy. New York: Elsevier; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Luhmann N. Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Moreno A, Mossio M. Biological autonomy. History, philosophy and theory. New York: Springer; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486(7402):207–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Von Foerster H. Cybernetics of cybernetics. In: Understanding understanding. New York: Springer; 2003. p. 283–6.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  91. Weber A, Varela FJ. Life after Kant: natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenol Cogn Sci. 2002;1(2):97–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Merleau-Ponty M. Themes from the lectures at the Collège de France, 1952-1960. Evanston: Northwestern University Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Hacking I. The social construction of what? Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Simondon G. L’individu et sa genèse physico-biologiqe: l’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Christoff K, Cosmelli D, Legrand D, Thompson E. Specifying the self for cognitive neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(3):104–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Bourbousson J, Fortes-Bourbousson M. How do co-agents actively regulate their collective behavior states? Front Psychol. 2016;7:1732.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Grandpierre A, Kafatos M. Biological autonomy. Philos Stud. 2012;2(9):631.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Jarosek S. Pragmatism, neural plasticity and mind-body Unity. Biosemiotics. 2013;6(2):205–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Vicuña Mackenna, 4860, Santiago, Chile

    Andrés Haye, Ricardo Morales & Sebastián Niño

Authors
  1. Andrés Haye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ricardo Morales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sebastián Niño
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés Haye .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT) INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Agustín Ibáñez

  2. Laboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT) INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Lucas Sedeño

  3. Laboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT) INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Adolfo M. García

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Haye, A., Morales, R., Niño, S. (2017). The Social/Neuroscience: Bridging or Polarizing Culture and Biology?. In: Ibáñez, A., Sedeño, L., García, A. (eds) Neuroscience and Social Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68421-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation