Abstract
It is argued that, although there is nothing to prevent other units (like state or even commercial enterprises) issuing GDP-linked securities, the market is likely to be dominated by sovereigns, who have both a need to borrow and an incentive, inasmuch as they are held responsible for anti-cyclical policy. It is also argued that countries committed to monetary union would be advised to express their mutual debts in this way, since this provides some element of automatic (but strictly temporary) transfer, while also giving creditors a stake in the prosperity of debtors. Finally, in view of the concentration of the Bank of England on the RS-model, we decided that it would be worthwhile to attempt to write an alternative term sheet for the BM-variant.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Reference
Blanchard, Olivier, Paolo Mauro, and Julien Acalin. 2016. The Case for Growth-Indexed Bonds in Advanced Economies Today. Policy Brief 16-2, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williamson, J. (2017). Topics in the Supply of GDP-Linked Securities. In: Growth-Linked Securities . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68333-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68333-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68332-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68333-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)