Abstract
The end-point of Sorokin’s articulated work is represented by the fact that the present juncture of societal transformation is in need of “humanity”. The Russian-American sociologist had an “intuition” synthesizable in the following statement: the future of humanity and its development is in the hands of humanity itself. Neither law nor education, much less religion, economics, or science, is up to this task. According to Sorokin, change must start from the rediscovery of the positive values of man, and science acts as a guide, also by overcoming strictly sensuous knowledge models. His is not just a sociology of the crisis. It is a “critical sociology” not limited to the analysis of the degenerative processes of society, but that seeks their deep roots by denouncing the negative factors causing them. Applying these assumptions implies understanding the mechanisms through which human beings make their own decisions. These dynamics highlight the problems of the choice and of the ethics of responsibility, as well as the role of science and researchers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The centre was established in 1949 thanks to founding by Mr. Eli Lilly and the Lilly Endowment, with the aim of promoting interdisciplinary research and organizing symposia on altruism, analyzing its types, aspects, and dimensions, as well as its effects on the individual, social, and biological life (health and well-being).
- 2.
On these five dimensions, some scholars (Levin and Kaplan 2010) developed and validated a measure of love, the Sorokin Multi-dimensional Inventory of Love Experience (SMILE). In view of Sorokin’s opposition to quantophreny and tests, leading to an excessive simplification of social reality, I doubt that he would have been particularly enthusiastic about this application of his theoretical framework on love.
- 3.
The nature has been particularly vulnerable to (more or less irreparable) damage, which also affects the well-being of humanity and, above all, future generations (pollution, deforestation, greenhouse effect, etc.).
- 4.
The acronym CNRS indicates the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, the largest public research organization in France.
References
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Penguin Books.
Bourdieu, P. (2013). In praise of sociology: Acceptance speech for the gold medal of the CNRS. Sociology, 47(1), 7–14.
D’Ambrosio, J. G., Faul, A. C., & Research Fellow. (2014). Love: Through the lens of Pitirim Sorokin. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 34(2), 36–46.
Donati, P. (2011a). Modernization and relational reflexivity. International Review of Sociology, 21(1), 21–39.
Donati, P. (2011b). Relational sociology: A new paradigm for the social sciences. London/New York: Routledge.
Donati, P. (2011c). Cultural change, family transitions and reflexivity in a morphogenetic society. Memorandum, 21, 39–55.
Donati, P., & Archer, M. (2015). The relational subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
Gehlen, A. (1989). Man in the age of technology. New York: Columbia University Press.
Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility. In Search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lassman, P., & Speirs, R. (1994). Weber: Political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lassman, P., Velody, I., & Martins, H. (1989). Max Weber Science as a Vocation. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Levin, J., & Kaplan, B. H. (2010). The Sorokin multidimensional inventory of love experience (SMILE): Development, validation, and religious determinants. Review of Religious Research, 51(4), 380–401.
Mangone, E. (2014). La conoscenza come forma di libertà responsabile: L’attualità del ‘cittadino ben informato’ di Alfred Schütz. Studi di Sociologia, 1, 53–69.
Melucci, A. (1994). Passaggio d’epoca. Milan: Feltrinelli.
Sainsaulieu, I. (2009). Il coinvolgimento del sociologo nel suo oggetto: Il caso del lavoro sociale, sanitario e di cura. Salute e Società, 8(suppl 3), 133–148.
Schütz, A. (1946). The well-informed citizen. An essay on the social distribution of knowledge. Social Research, 14(4), 463–478.
Sorokin, P.A. (n.d.). The nature of sociology and its relation to other sciences. University of Saskatchewan: University Archives & Special Collections, P.A. Sorokin fonds, MG449, I, A, 3.
Sorokin, P. A. (1928). Contemporary sociological theories. New York: Harper.
Sorokin, P. A. (1948). The reconstruction of humanity. Boston: The Bacon.
Sorokin, P. A. (1950). Altruistic love: A study of American good neighbors and christian saints. Boston: Beacon.
Sorokin, P. A. (1955). Les travaux du Centre de recherches de Harvard sur l’altruisme créateur. Cahier internataux de. Sociologie, 19, 92–103.
Sorokin, P. A. (1954). The ways and power of love: Types, factors and techniques of moral transformation. Boston: Beacon.
Sorokin, P. A. (1958). Integralism is my philosophy. In W. Burnett (Ed.), This is my philosophy. Twenty of the world’s outstanding thinkers reveal the deepest meaning they have found in life (pp. 180–189). London: George Allen & Unwin.
Valsiner, J. (2017). Mente e culture: La psicologia come scienza dell’uomo. Rome: Carocci editore.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mangone, E. (2018). From Creative Altruistic Love to the Ethics of Responsibility. In: Social and Cultural Dynamics . SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68309-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68309-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68308-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68309-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)