Quality Improvement Projects and Indicators

  • Emily FondahnEmail author


This chapter starts with a discussion of basic principles of quality improvement. Current quality indicators and metrics in primary care are reviewed. Information about the CLER program is included along with highlighting how residents engage in the quality improvement projects within an academic medical practice.


Quality indicators Patient experience Clinical Learning Environment Review (CLER) 


  1. 1.
    Institute of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    2015 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report and the 5th Anniversary Update on the National Quality Strategy. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; April 2016. Report No.: Contract No.: AHRQ Pub. No. 16-0015.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Squires D, Anderson C. U.S. health care from a global perspective: spending, use of services, prices and health in 13 countries. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). October 2015.
  4. 4.
    Ward BW, Schiller JS, Goodman RA. Multiple chronic conditions among US adults: a 2012 update. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E62.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gerteis J, Izrael D, Deitz D, LeRoy L, Ricciardi R, Miller T, Basu J. Multiple chronic conditions chartbook. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; April 2014. Report No.: Contract No.: AHRQ Publications No, Q14-0038.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bisognano M, Kenney C. Pursuing the triple aim: seven innovators show the way to better care, better health, and lower costs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2012.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCarthy D, Klien S. The triple aim journey: improving population health and patients’ experience of care, while reducing costs (Commonw Fund). 22 July 2010.
  8. 8.
    Landon BE. Use of quality indicators in patient care: a senior primary care physician trying to take good care of his patients. JAMA. 2012;307(9):956–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Malley AS, Rich EC, Maccarone A, DesRoches CM, Reid RJ. Disentangling the linkage of primary care features to patient outcomes: a review of current literature, data sources, and measurement needs. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(Suppl 3):576–85.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691–729.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tunis SR, Hayward RA, Wilson MC, et al. Internists’ attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120(11):956–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Addington D, Kyle T, Desai S, Wang J. Facilitators and barriers to implementing quality measurement in primary mental health care: systematic review. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56(12):1322–31.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scott A, Sivey P, Ait Ouakrim D, Willenberg L, Naccarella L, Furler J, et al. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(9):Cd008451.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Executive Summary: Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive under the Physician Fee Schedule, and Criteria for Physician-Focused Payment Models. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS, 2016 Contract No.: 42 CFR Parts 414 and 495 [CMS-5517-FC], RIN 0938-AS69.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Quality Payment Program.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey 3.0 and Instructions. Rockville, MD2016 [12/29/16].
  19. 19.
    The Internal Medicine Milestone Project. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and The American Board of Internal Medicine, 2015.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Simasek M, Ballard SL, Phelps P, Pingul-Ravano R, Kolb NR, Finkelstein A, et al. Meeting resident scholarly activity requirements through a longitudinal quality improvement curriculum. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(1):86–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boggan JC, Cheely G, Shah BR, Heffelfinger R, Springall D, Thomas SM, et al. A novel approach to practice-based learning and improvement using a web-based audit and feedback module. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(3):541–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mosser G, Frisch KK, Skarda PK, Gertner E. Addressing the challenges in teaching quality improvement. Am J Med. 2009;122(5):487–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wagner R, Patow C, Newton R, Casey BR, Koh NJ, Weiss KB. The overview of the CLER program: CLER national report of findings 2016. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(2 Suppl 1):11–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weiss KB, Bagian JP, Wagner R. CLER pathways to excellence: expectations for an optimal clinical learning environment (executive summary). J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(3):610–1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guinane C, Davis N. Improving quality in outpatient services. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations