Reliability and damage

  • Haym Benaroya
Chapter
Part of the Springer Praxis Books book series (PRAXIS)

Abstract

In this chapter, we introduce the issues of design life, a background to structural reliability and some possible tools that can be useful when we go from concept to reality in our designs for habitats on the Moon. Reliability can be interpreted as the probability that the designed object will function within the design guidelines for the design life. A reliability design often includes an estimate of a rate of failure, perhaps as a function of time. A corollary of reliability is durability, which is a quantitative assessment of how an object ages over time and is still able to operate within the design guidelines. For mechanical components, aging occurs due to high-cycle fatigue, corrosion, other forms of wear, design stress exceedances, impacts, and friction effects, for example.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Kaplan, and B.J. Garrik: On the Quantitative Definition of Risk, Risk Analysis, Vol.1, No.1, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Benaroya: Reliability of Structures for the Moon, Structural Safety, Vol.15, 1994, pp.67–84.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Shortridge, T. Aven, and S. Guikema: Risk assessment under deep uncertainty: A methodological comparison, Reliability and System Safety 159 (2017) pp.12-23.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Hormek, R. Facius, M. Reichert, P. Rettberg, W. Seboldt, D. Manzey, B. Comet, A. Maillet, H. Preiss, L. Schauser, C.G. Dussap, L. Poughon, A. Belyavin, G. Reitz, C. Baumstark-Khan, and R. Gerzer: HUMEX, A Study on the Survivability and Adaptation of Humans to Long-Duration Exploratory Missions, Part 1: Lunar Missions, Advances in Space Research, Vol.31, No.11, 2003, pp.2389-2401.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Horneck, and B. Comet: General Human Health Issues for Moon and Mars Missions: Results from the HUMEX Study, Advances in Space Research , Vol.37, 2006, pp.100–108.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Downer: When Failure is an Option: Redundancy, Reliability and Regulation in Complex Technical Systems, Discussion Paper No.53, Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science, May 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W.W. Mendell, and R.P. Heydorn: Lunar precursor missions for human exploration of Mars - III: Studies of system reliability and maintenance, Acta Astronautica 55 (2004) pp.773-780.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tension Structures: Behavior and Analysis, W.J. Leonard, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988; An Introduction to Cable Roof Structures, H.A. Buchhold, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985; Tensile Structures, Frei Otto, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1973.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Benaroya: Tensile-integrity structures for the Moon, Applied Mechanics of a Lunar Base, H. Benaroya, Editor, Applied Mechanics Reviews, Vol.46, No.6, June 1993; Also, H. Benaroya: Reliability of Structures for the Moon, cited earlier.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Furuya: Concept of deployable tensegrity structures in space application, International Journal of Space Structures, 7(2) (1992); A.S.K. Kwan, and S. Pellegrino: A cable-rigidized 3d pantograph, Proceedings of the 4th Euro Symposium on Space Mechanisms and Tribology, Cannes, 1989.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    We have drawn on the book by Madsen et al., for our subsequent discussion on structural safety: Methods of Structural Safety, H.O. Madsen, S. Krenk, N.C. Lind, Prentice-Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Jin and Y. Chen: Quality and Reliability Information Integration for Design Evaluation of Fixture System Reliability, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, Vol.17, 2001, pp.355-372.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    This is by no means the complete description of fatigue failure. The interested reader should refer to Metal Fatigue, N.E. Frost, K.J. Marsh, and L.P. Pook, Oxford University Press, 1974, reprinted by Dover Publications, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Near-Earth Objects: Finding Them Before They Find Us, D.H. Yeomans, Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B.G. Cour-Palais: Meteoroid Environment Model - 1969 - Near Earth to Lunar Surface, NASA SP-8013, March 1969.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Tamponnet: Life Support Systems for Lunar Missions, Advances in Space Research, Vol.18, No.11, 1996, pp.(11)103-(11)110.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Smith: Mechanics of materials in lunar base design, in Applied Mechanics of a Lunar Base, H. Benaroya, Editor, ASME Applied Mechanics Reviews, Vol. 46, No 6, June 1993.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. McNamara, R. Suggs, B. Kauffman, J. Jones, W. Cooke, and S. Smith: Meteoroid Engineering Model (ME): A Meteoroid Model for the Inner Solar System, Earth, Moon, and Planets (2004) 95, pp.123-139.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Oberst, A. Christou, R. Suggs, D. Moser, I.J. Daubar, A.S. McEwen, M. Burchell, T. Kawamura, H. Hiesinger, K. Wünnemann, R. Wagner, and M.S. Robinson: The present-day flux of large meteoroids on the lunar surface – A synthesis of models and observational techniques, Planetary and Space Science 74 (2012) pp. 179-194.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    K.B. Hayashida, and J.H. Robinson: Single Wall Penetration Equations, NASA Technical Memorandum TM-103565, December 1991.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E.P. Steinberg, and W. Bulleit: Reliability analyses of meteoroid loading on lunar structures, Structural Safety 15 (1994) pp.51-66.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Methods of Structural Safety, H.O. Madsen, S. Krenk, and N.C. Lind, Prentice-Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    N.J. Lindsey: Lunar Station Protection: Lunar Regolith Shielding, International Lunar Conference 2003, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S.W. Evans, R. Stallworth, J. Robinson, R. Stellingwerf, and E. Engler: Meteoroid Risk Assessment of Lunar Habitat Concepts, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, 2006.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    W.P. Schonberg, F. Schäfer, and R. Putzar: Some Comments on the Protection of Lunar Habitats Against Damage from Meteoroid Impacts, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol.23, No.1, January 1, 2010, pp.90-97.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R.B. Malla, and T.G. Gionet: Dynamic Response of a Pressurized Frame-Membrane Lunar Structure with Regolith Cover Subjected to Impact Load, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol.26, No.4, October 1, 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haym Benaroya
    • 1
  1. 1.Professor of Mechanical & Aerospace EngineeringRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations