Skip to main content

Archaeology and the Study of Globalization in the Past

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comparing Globalizations

Part of the book series: World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures ((WSEGF))

  • 718 Accesses

Abstract

To be most useful, the study of globalization must be placed in a temporal context. Even a casual examination of the past reveals significant interconnections between societies. These exchanges took the form of trade, migration, conquest, intermarriage, and other activities. Careful analysis reveals patterns in such interaction that can help us more clearly define globalization as a long-term process with a cyclical nature. Archaeology is critical for extending the study of globalization in this manner in both historic and prehistoric periods; it provides data on places and people not included in historical documents, and permits examination of periods prior to the emergence of writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Algaze, G. (1993). The Uruk world system: The dynamics of expansion of early Mesopotamian civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algaze, G. (2008). Ancient Mesopotamia at the dawn of civilization: The evolution of an urban landscape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. (1997). Contested peripheries: Philistia in the Neo-Assyrian world-system. Ph.D. dissertation, Interdepartmental Archaeology Program, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, I. (1999). The Southern Aegean system. Journal of World-Systems Research, 5, 475–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1962). Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity, 28(2), 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, R., & Feinman, G. M. (1984). The Mesoamerican world system. American Anthropologist, 86, 673–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C., & Anderson, E. N. (Eds.). (2005). The historical evolution of world-systems. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C., & Hall, T. D. (Eds.). (1991). Core/periphery relations in precapitalist worlds. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C., & Hall, T. D. (1997). Rise and demise: Comparing world-systems. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C., & Hall, T. D. (1998). World-systems in North America: Networks, rise and fall and pulsations of trade in stateless systems. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 22(1), 23–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C., & Mann, K. M. (1998). The Wintu and their neighbors: A very small world-system in Northern California. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C., Pasciuti, D., Alvarez, A., & Hall, T. D. (2006). Growth/decline phases and semiperipheral development in the ancient Mesopotamian and Egyptian world-systems. In B. K. Gills & W. R. Thompson (Eds.), Globalization and global history (pp. 114–138). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, J. F., & Parkinson, W. A. (2003). Lithic artifacts from surveys: A comparative evaluation of recent evidence from the Southern Aegean. In P. N. Kardulias & R. W. Yerkes (Eds.), Written in stone: The multiple dimensions of lithic analysis (pp. 35–57). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S. C. (2007). The recurring dark ages: Ecological stress, climate changes, and system transformation. Lanham, MD: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, E. (2000). ‘Contested peripheries’ in world systems theory: Megiddo and Jezreel valley as a test case. Journal of World-Systems Research, 6, 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Altroy, T., & Earle, T. (1985). Staple finance, wealth finance, and storage in the Inka political economy. Current Anthropology, 26(2), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edens, C. (1992). Dynamics of trade in the ancient Mesopotamian “world system”. American Anthropologist, 94, 118–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filini, A. (2004). The presence of Teotihuacan in the Cuitzeo Basin, Michoaca’n, Mexico: A world-system perspective. BAR International Series 1279. Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. G. (1993). The Bronze Age world system and its cycles. Current Anthropology, 34, 383–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. G., & Gills, B. K. (Eds.). (1993). The world system: Five hundred years or five thousand? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaty, M. L., & Parkinson, W. A. (1999). Putting Mycenaean palaces in their place. In M. L. Galaty & W. A. Parkinson (Eds.), Rethinking Mycenaean palaces: New interpretations of an old idea (pp. 1–8). Los Angeles: Institute of Archaeology, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaves, A. (2010). The land of Ionia. Society and economy in the archaic period. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T. D. (1986). Incorporation in the world-system: Toward a critique. American Sociological Review, 51(3), 390–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T. D., & Chase-Dunn, C. (1993). The world-systems perspective and archaeology: Forward into the past. Journal of Archaeological Research, 1(2), 121–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T. D., Kardulias, P. N., & Chase-Dunn, C. (2011). World-systems analysis and archaeology: Continuing the dialogue. Journal of Archaeological Research, 19(3), 233–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. (2011). Globalizations and the ancient world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardulias, P. N. (1990). Fur production as a specialized activity in a world system: Indians in the North American fur trade. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 14, 25–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardulias, P. N. (1992). The ecology of flaked stone tool production in Southern Greece: The evidence from Agios Stephanos and the Southern Argolid. American Journal of Archaeology, 96, 421–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardulias, P. N. (1999a). Multiple levels in the Aegean Bronze Age world-system. In P. N. Kardulias (Ed.), World-systems theory in practice: Leadership, production, and exchange (pp. 179–201). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardulias, P. N. (1999b). Flaked stone and the role of the palaces in the Mycenaean world system. In M. L. Galaty & W. A. Parkinson (Eds.), Rethinking Mycenaean palaces: New interpretations of an old idea (pp. 61–71). Los Angeles: Institute of Archaeology, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardulias, P. N. (Ed.). (1999c). World-systems theory in practice: Leadership, production, and exchange. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardulias, P. N. (2007). Negotiation and incorporation on the margins of world-systems: Examples from Cyprus and North America. Journal of World-Systems Research, 13, 55–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardulias, P. N., & Hall, T. D. (2008). Archaeology and world-systems analysis. World Archaeology, 40, 572–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardulias, P. N., & Runnels, C. N. (1995). The lithic artifacts. In C. N. Runnels, D. Pullen, & S. Langdon (Eds.), Artifact and assemblage: The finds from a regional survey of the Southern Argolid, Greece, Volume I: The prehistoric pottery and the lithic artifacts (pp. 74–139). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardulias, P. N., & Yerkes, R. W. (2004). World-systems theory and regional survey: The Malloura valley survey on Cyprus. In E. Athanassopoulos & L. Wandsnider (Eds.), Mediterranean archaeological landscapes: Current issues (pp. 143–164). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, P. L. (1987). The use and abuse of world systems theory: The case of the Pristine West Asian State. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 11, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, K. (1998a). Europe before history. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, K. (1998b). The emergence of the European world system in the Bronze Age: Divergence, convergence and social evolution during the first and second millennia BC in Europe. In K. Kristiansen & M. Rowlands (Eds.), Social transformations in archaeology: Global and local perspectives (pp. 287–324). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, K., & Larsson, T. B. (2005). The rise of Bronze Age society: Travels, transmissions and transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBianca, Ø. S., & Scham, S. A. (2006). Connectivity in antiquity: Globalization as a long-term historical process. Oakville, CT: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pailes, R. A., & Whitecotton, J. W. (1979). The greater Southwest and the Mesoamerican “world” system: An exploratory model of frontier relationships. In W. W. Savage & S. I. Thompson (Eds.), The frontier: comparative studies (Vol. 2, pp. 105–121). Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, W. A., & Galaty, M. (2007). Secondary states in perspective: An integrated approach to state formation in the prehistoric Aegean. American Anthropologist, 109, 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, W. A., & Galaty, M. (Eds.). (2010). Archaic state interaction: The Eastern Mediterranean in the Bronze Age. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrine, P. N. (1992). Mississippian evolution: A world-system perspective. Madison, WI: Prehistory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrine, P. N., & Feinman, G. M. (Eds.). (1996). Pre-columbian world systems. Madison, WI: Prehistory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M. (1998). Centre and periphery: A review of a concept. In K. Kristiansen & M. Rowlands (Eds.), Social transformations in archaeology: Global and local perspectives (pp. 219–242). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, S. K. (Ed.). (1995). Civilizations and world-systems: Two approaches to the study of world-historical change. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santley, R. S., & Alexander, R. T. (1992). The political economy of core-periphery systems. In E. M. Schortman & P. A. Urban (Eds.), Resources, power, and interregional interaction (pp. 23–49). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schortman, E. M., & Urban, P. A. (1987). Modeling interregional interaction in prehistory. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 11, 37–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schortman, E. M., & Urban, P. A. (Eds.). (1992). Resources, power, and interregional interaction. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schortman, E. M., & Urban, P. A. (1994). Living on the edge: Core/periphery relations in ancient Southeastern Mesoamerica. Current Anthropology, 35, 401–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherratt, A. (1997). Economy and society in prehistoric Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherratt, A. (2003a). The horse and the wheel: The dialectics of change in the Circum-Pontic region and adjacent areas, 4500–1500 BC. In M. Levine, C. Renfrew, & K. Boyle (Eds.), Prehistoric Steppe adaptation and the horse (pp. 233–252). Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherratt, S. (2003b). The Mediterranean economy: ‘Globalization’ at the end of the second millennium BCE. In W. G. Dever & S. Gitin (Eds.), Symbiosis, symbolism, and the power of the past: Canaan, ancient Israel, and their neighbors from the late Bronze Age through roman Palaestina (pp. 37–62). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherratt, A. (2006). The trans-Eurasian exchange: The prehistory of Chinese relations with the west. In V. H. Mair (Ed.), Contact and exchange in the ancient world (pp. 30–61). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherratt, A., & Sherratt, S. (1991). From luxuries to commodities: The nature of Mediterranean Bronze Age trading systems. In N. H. Gale (Ed.), Bronze Age trade in the mediterranean (pp. 351–386). Jonsered: Paul Astroms Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherratt, A., & Sherratt, S. (1993). The growth of the Mediterranean economy in the early first millennium BC. World Archaeology, 24, 361–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. E., & Berdan, F. F. (2003). Spatial structure of the Mesoamerican world-system. In M. E. Smith & F. F. Berdan (Eds.), The postclassic Mesoamerican world (pp. 21–31). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, G. (1999). Rethinking world-systems. Diasporas, colonies, and interaction in Uruk Mesopotamia. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. R. (2006). Trade pulsations, collapse, and reorientation in the ancient world. In Ø. S. LaBianca & S. A. Scham (Eds.), Connectivity in antiquity: Globalization as a long-term historical process (pp. 32–57). Oakville, CT: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world-system: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. J., LeBlanc, S. A., & Redman, C. L. (1971). Explanation in archaeology: An explicitly scientific approach. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, D. (2000). Civilizations, world systems and hegemonies. In R. A. Denemark, J. Friedman, B. K. Gills, & G. Modelski (Eds.), World system history: The social science of long-term change (pp. 54–84). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Nick Kardulias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nick Kardulias, P. (2018). Archaeology and the Study of Globalization in the Past. In: Hall, T. (eds) Comparing Globalizations. World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68219-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68219-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68218-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68219-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics