Neo-Tribes pp 137-152 | Cite as

Dedicated Followers of PaSSion (1995–Present): Seasoned Clubbers and the Mediation of Collective Memory as a Process of Digital Gift-Giving

  • Zoe Armour
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter introduces the term micro-ties (friendships) into the literature on dance culture in relation to the neo-tribes turn. It focuses on a grouping of ‘seasoned clubbers’ who socialise in core micro-groups within the larger clubbing network and subscribe to being DFOP (Dedicated Followers of PaSSion). The application of a virtual ethnography was used to analyse the news feed as a temporal construction of DFOP recollections in three public Facebook clubbing groups. In a general sense clubbers can be described as tribalised in terms of their inseparability from mass global electronic dance music consumption practices. Yet an internal fixity that challenges former applications of a neo-tribes ethos is rendered visible through a process of symbolic digital gift-giving in the continuation of a mediated collective memory and performance of authenticity online.

References

  1. Assmann, J. (2008). Communicative and Cultural Memory. In A. Erll, A. Nunning, & S. B. Young (Eds.), Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook (pp. 109–118). Berlin/New York: Walter De Gruyter/GmbH & Co. KG.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, A. (1999). Subcultures or Neo-Tribes? Rethinking the Relationship Between Youth, Style and Musical Taste. Sociology, 33(3), 599–617.Google Scholar
  3. Clarke, J., Hall, S., Jefferson, T., & Roberts, B. (1976). Subcultures, Cultures and Class: A Theoretical Overview. In S. Hall & T. Jefferson (Eds.), Resistance Through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post-War Britain (pp. 9–74). London: Hutchinson & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, S. (1972). Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. London: MacGibbon and Kee Ltd.Google Scholar
  5. Connerton, P. (1989). How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garratt, S. (1998). Adventures in Wonderland: A Decade of Club Culture. London: Headline Book Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Goffman, I. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  9. Gore, G. (1997). The Beat Goes on: Trance, Dance and Tribalism in Rave Culture. In H. Thomas (Ed.), Dance in the City (pp. 50–67). New York: St Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goulding, C., & Shankar, A. (2011). Club Culture, Neotribalism and Ritualised Behaviour. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1435–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Habermas, J. (1981/1987). The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Halbwachs, M. (1992). On Collective Memory: The Heritage of Sociology (L. A. Coser, Trans.). Chicago, USA: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hall, S., & Jefferson, T. (1976). Resistance Through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post-War Britain. London: Hutchinson & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. Hine, C. (2003). Virtual Ethnography. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Hodkinson, P. (2004). The Goth Scene and (Sub)cultural Substance. In A. Bennett & K. Kahn-Harris (Eds.), After Subculture: Critical Studies in Contemporary Youth Culture (pp. 135–147). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hodkinson, P. (2015). Youth Cultures and the Rest of Life: Subcultures, Post-subcultures and Beyond. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(5), 629–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hogan, B. (2010). The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Husserl, E. (1936/1970). The Crisis to European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  19. JFK, DJ, and Project, MYNC. (2000). Passion Album. London: Credence.Google Scholar
  20. Lincoln, S., & Robards, B. (2016). Editing the Project of Self: Sustained Facebook Use and Growing-Up Online. Journal of Youth Studies, 20, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maffesoli, M. (1996). The Time of the Tribes: The Decline of Individualism in Mass Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Mauss, M. 1967. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange (I. Gunnison, Trans.). New York: Norton Company.Google Scholar
  23. McEwen, R. N., & Scheaffer, K. (2013). Virtual Mourning and Memory Construction on Facebook: Here Are the Terms of Use. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 33(3–4), 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sauter, T. (2013). What’s on Your Mind? Writing on Facebook as a Tool for Self-Formation. New Media & Society, 16(5), 823–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Signum, Producer. (1998). What Ya Got 4 Me? (Remixed by DJ/producer JFK in 2010). Northampton: Tidy Trax.Google Scholar
  26. Thornton, S. (1994). Moral Panic, the Media and British Rave Culture. In A. Ross & T. Rose (Eds.), Microphone Fiends: Youth Music & Youth Culture (pp. 176–192). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Thornton, S. (1995). Club Cultures: Music, Media and Subcultural Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Tiesto, D. J. (2004). Love Comes Again. Netherlands: Magik Musik.Google Scholar
  29. Zimmer, M. (2010). “But the Data Is Already Public”: On the Ethics of Research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4), 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zoe Armour
    • 1
  1. 1.De Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations