Neo-Tribes pp 71-87 | Cite as

‘It’s Been Nice, but We’re Going Back to Our Lives’: Neo-Tribalism and the Role of Space in a Gay Resort

  • Oskaras Vorobjovas-Pinta
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter offers a review of gay holidays at a gay resort within the scope of neo-tribal theory. Focusing upon the underlying neo-tribal characteristics such as fluidity in membership, shared sentiment, rituals and symbols, this chapter emphasises the importance of space as a point of coherence around which neo-tribes form. The chapter argues that space acts as an agency to enable the aforementioned characteristics. A sense of belonging, connectedness and affinity are the paramount qualities that define the internally embedded culture within a neo-tribe. Vorobjovas-Pinta concludes that space is a fundamental converging characteristic required for a neo-tribe to exist. Space is elevated in its relationship to neo-tribes, in the sense that feelings of collective ownership by the tribe of space, are constitutive of tribal identity itself.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank The Institute for the Study of Social Change, University of Tasmania, for financial support to assist with publishing this research.

References

  1. Aung, M., & Sha, O. (2016). Clothing Consumption Culture of a Neo-Tribe: Gay Professionals Within the Subculture of Gay Consumers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 20(1), 34–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, A. (1999). Subcultures or Neo-Tribes? Rethinking the Relationship Between Youth, Style and Musical Taste. Sociology, 33(3), 599–617.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, S. (2005). Action Ethnography: Using Participant Observation. In B. W. Ritchie, P. Burns, & C. Palmer (Eds.), Tourism Research Methods: Integrating Theory with Practice (pp. 63–72). Wallingford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooper, S., McLoughlin, D., & Keating, A. (2005). Individual and Neo-Tribal Consumption: Tales from the Simpsons of Springfield. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(5), 330–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cova, B., & Cova, V. (2002). Tribal Marketing: The Tribalisation of Society and Its Impact on the Conduct of Marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 36(5–6), 595–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goulding, C., & Shankar, A. (2011). Club Culture, Neotribalism and Ritualised Behaviour. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1435–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greenacre, L., Freeman, L., & Donald, M. (2013). Contrasting Social Network and Tribal Theories: An Applied Perspective. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 948–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hardy, A., & Robards, B. (2015). The Ties That Bind: Exploring the Relevance of Neotribal Theory to Tourism. Tourism Analysis, 20(4), 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hardy, A., Hanson, D., & Gretzel, U. (2012). Online Representations of RVing Neo-Tribes in the USA and Australia. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 10(3), 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hardy, A., Gretzel, U., & Hanson, D. (2013). Travelling Neo-Tribes: Conceptualising Recreational Vehicle Users. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 11(1–2), 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hughes, H. L. (2002). Gay Men’s Holiday Destination Choice: A Case of Risk and Avoidance. International Journal of Tourism Research, 4(4), 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hughson, J. (1999). A Tale of Two Tribes: Expressive Fandom in Australian Soccer’s a-League. Culture, Sport, Society, 2(3), 10–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kriwoken, L., & Hardy, A. (2017). Neo-Tribes and Antarctic Expedition Cruise Ship Tourists. Annals of Leisure Research, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2017.1286512
  14. Maffesoli, M. (1996). The Time of the Tribes: The Decline of Individualism in Mass Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Malpas, J. (2012). Putting Space in Place: Philosophical Topography and Relational Geography. Environment and Planning D: Society an Space, 30(2), 226–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Ross, G. F. (2005). Senior Tourists Sociability and Travel Preparation. Tourism Review, 60(2), 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Silva, S. C., & dos Santos, M. C. (2012). How to Capitalise on a Tribe. The Marketing Review, 12(4), 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sørensen, A. (2003). Backpacker Ethnography. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(4), 847–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Varjas, K., Nastasi, B. K., Moore, R. B., & Jayasena, A. (2005). Using Ethnographic Methods for Development of Culture-Specific Interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 43(3), 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vorobjovas-Pinta, O. (2017). Gay Neo-Tribes: An Exploration of Space and Travel Behaviour (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Hobart: University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
  22. Vorobjovas-Pinta, O., & Hardy, A. (2016). The Evolution of Gay Travel Research. International Journal of Tourism Research, 18(4), 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vorobjovas-Pinta, O., & Robards, B. (2017). The Shared Oasis: An Insider Ethnographic Account of a Gay Resort. Tourist Studies, 17(4), 369–387.Google Scholar
  24. Weaver, A. (2011). The Fragmentation of Markets, Neo-Tribes, Nostalgia, and the Culture of Celebrity: The Rise of Themed Cruises. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 18(1), 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oskaras Vorobjovas-Pinta
    • 1
  1. 1.Tasmanian School of Business and EconomicsUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations