Neo-Tribes pp 207-219 | Cite as

#Topless Tuesdays and #Wet Wednesdays: Digitally Mediated Neo-Tribalism and NSFW Selfies on Tumblr

  • Matt Hart
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores neo-tribal theory as a way of making sense of the sociality practised by young people who share nude ‘Not Safe For Work’ (NSFW) selfies on the social media platform tumblr. Social interaction on Tumblr is far more fluid than that which occurs in online forums. There are a milieu of online groups and cultural events that occur in Tumblr on a regular basis, and young people seamlessly move between these as they form, coalesce, and disperse. Observing patterns of interaction which resemble ‘online community’ is therefore problematic. Tumblr users often describe shared sentiments or experiences of belonging that is marked by ritualistic and temporal behaviour. This chapter joins recent work in appropriating the concept of the neo-tribe in contemporary youth culture.

References

  1. Baym, N. (1998). The Emergence of Online Community. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community (pp. 35–68). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, A. (1999). Subcultures or Neo-Tribes? Rethinking the Relationship Between Youth, Style, and Musical Taste. Sociology, 33(3), 599–617.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, A., & Kahn-Harris, K. (Eds.). (2004). After Subculture: Critical Studies in Contemporary Youth Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Bishai, S. (2012). Blog Like an Egyptian. In J. Salmons (Ed.), Cases in Online Interview Research (pp. 37–56). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chambers, D. (2013). Social Media and Personal Relationships: Online Intimacies and Networked Friendship. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cova, B., & Cova, V. (2002). Tribal Marketing: The Tribalisation of Society and Its Impact on the Conduct of Marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 36(5–6), 595–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crofts, T., Lee, M., McGovern, A., & Milivojenic, S. (2015). Sexting and Young People. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cummings, J. (2006). It’s More Than a T-shirt: Neo-Tribal Sociality and Linking Images at Australian Indie Music Festivals. Perfect Beat, 8(1), 65–84.Google Scholar
  9. de Laine, M. (2000). Fieldwork, Participation and Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Deegan, A. (2012). Stranger in a Strange Land: The Challenges and Benefits of Online Interviews in the Social Networking Space. In J. Salmons (Ed.), Cases in Online Interview Research (pp. 69–90). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goulding, C., & Shankar, A. (2011). Club Culture, Neotribalism and Ritualised Behaviour. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1435–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hardy, A., & Robards, B. (2015). The Ties that Bind: Exploring Neo-Tribal Theory’s Relevance to Tourism. Tourism Analysis, 20(4), 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardy, A., Gretzel, U., & Hanson, D. (2013). Travelling Neo-Tribes: Conceptualising Recreational Vehicle Users. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 11(3), 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hart, M. (2015). Youth Intimacy on Tumblr: A Pilot Study. Young, 23(3), 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hart, M. (2016). Being Naked on the Internet: Young People’s Selfies as Intimate Edgework. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(3), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hester, H., Jones, B., & Taylor-Harman, S. (2015). Giffing a Fuck: Non-narrative Pleasures in Participatory Porn Cultures and Female Fandom. Porn Studies, 2(4), 356–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hine, C. (2013). The Internet: Understanding Qualitative Research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the Vulnerable. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luckman, S. (2003). Going Bush and Finding One’s ‘Tribe’: Raving, Escape and the Bush Doof. Continuum: A Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 17(3), 318–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lyng, S. (1990). Edgework: A Social Psychological Analysis of Voluntary Risk Taking. American Journal of Sociology, 95(4), 851–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maffesoli, M. (1996). The Time of the Tribes: The Decline of Individualism in Mass Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Melrose, M. (2002). Labour Pains: Some Considerations on the Difficulties of Researching Juvenile Prostitution. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(4), 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miltner, K. (2014). Studying Selfies: Evidence, Affect, Ethics, and the Internet’s Visual Turn. Social Media Collective. https://socialmediacollective.org/2014/04/15/call-for-papers-studying-selfies-evidence-affect-ethics-and-the-internets-visual-turn/. Accessed 16 Apr 2014.
  24. Muise, A. (2011). Women’s Sex Blogs: Challenging Dominant Discourses of Heterosexual Desire. Feminism & Psychology, 21(3), 411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Opdenakker, R. (2006). Advantages and Disadvantages of Four Interview Techniques in Qualitative Research. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung, 7(4), Art. 11. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0604118.
  26. Parks, M. (2011). Social Network Sites as Virtual Communities. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 105–123). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Renninger, B. J. (2014). ‘Where I Can Be Myself, Where I Can Speak My Mind’: Networked Counterpublics in a Polymedia Environment. New Media & Society, 17(9), 1513–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richardson, I., Third, A., & MacColl, I. (2007, September 19–21). DIMEA ’07: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
  29. Robards, B., & Bennett, A. (2011). MyTribe: Postsubcultural Manifestations of Belonging on Social Network Sites. Sociology, 45(2), 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scott, S. (2004). Researching Shyness: A Contradiction in Terms? Qualitative Inquiry, 4(1), 91–105.Google Scholar
  31. Shields, R. (1992). Lifestyle Shopping: The Subject of Consumption. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stanojević, D. (2007). From Subculture to Scene and Tribe: Post-Birmingham Approaches to the Relationship Between Youth, Music and Style. Sociologija, 43(3), 264–282.Google Scholar
  33. Sweetman, P. (2004). Tourists and Travellers?: Subcultures, Reflexive Identities, and Neo-Tribal Sociality. In A. Bennett & K. Kahn-Harris (Eds.), After Subculture: Critical Studies in Contemporary Youth Culture (pp. 79–93). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tiidenberg, K. (2016). Boundaries and Conflict in a NSFW Community on Tumblr: The Meanings and Uses of Selfies. New Media and Society, 18(8), 1563–1578.Google Scholar
  35. Tiidenberg, K. (2014). Bringing Sexy Back: Reclaiming the Body Aesthetic Via Self-Shooting. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychological Research on Cyberspace, 8(1). https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4295/3342.
  36. Tiidenberg, K., & Cruz, E. G. (2015). Selfies, Image, and the Re-making of the Body. Body & Society, 21(4), 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tranter, B. (2011). Sampling. In M. Walter (Ed.), Social Research Methods (pp. 123–148). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Travers, M. (2011). Qualitative Interviewing Methods. In M. Walter (Ed.), Social Research Methods (pp. 287–322). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wellings, K., Branigan, P., & Mitchell, K. (2000). Discomfort, Discord, and Discontinuity as Data: Using Focus Groups to Research Sensitive Topics. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 2(3), 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matt Hart
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Leicester, School of Media, Communication and SociologyLondonUK

Personalised recommendations