Advertisement

Cognitive and Psychomotor Performance

  • D. ManzeyEmail author
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Space Life Sciences book series (BRIEFSSLS)

Abstract

During space flight, astronauts are exposed to a variety of stressors. Some of these stressors originate from the specific environmental conditions in space (e.g. microgravity, radiation). Others are more unspecific and originate from living and working as member of a small crew in a confined and isolated habitat (e.g. lack of privacy, social monotony). This chapter summarizes our current knowledge about the impact of these space flight-related stressors on cognitive and psychomotor performance of astronauts. It suggests that basic cognitive processes are highly resilient and remain as efficient in space as on Earth. Similarly also processes of spatial imagery and object recognition do not seem to be affected much by the altered conditions in space. In contrast, considerable performance decrements have consistently been observed in different psychomotor tasks. These decrements seem to be caused by microgravity-induced changes of sensorimotor processes, at least during a transient period of primary adaptation to space. The available evidence pointing to impairments of executive functions and higher cognitive processes in space is less conclusive at this time.

Keywords

Cognitive performance Spatial cognition Psychomotor performance Spaceflight Microgravity 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Basner M, Dinges DF, Mollicone DJ, Savelev I, Ecker AJ, Di Antonio A, Jones CW, Hyder EC, Kan K, Morukov BV, Sutton JP (2014) Psychological and behavioral changes during confinement in a 520-day simulated interplanetary mission to Mars. PLoS One 9:e93298.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093298 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Benke T, Koserenko O, Watson NV, Gerstenbrand F (1993) Space and cognition: the measurement of behavioral functions during a 6-day space mission. Aviat Space Environ Med 64:376–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger M, Mescheriakov S, Molokanova E, Lechner-Steinleitner S, Seguer N, Kozlovskaya V (1997) Pointing arm movements in short- and long-term spaceflight. Aviat Space Environ Med 68:781–787PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop SL (2011) From Earth analogs to space: getting there from here. In: Vakoch TA (ed) Psychology of space exploration. Contemporary research in historical perspective, NASA SP-2011-4411. NASA, Washington, pp 47–78Google Scholar
  5. Bock O (1994) Joint position sense in simulated changed-gravity environments. Aviat Space Environ Med 65:621–626PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bock O (1998) Problems of sensorimotor coordination in weightlessness. Brain Res Rev 28:155–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bock O, Arnold KE, Cheung BSK (1996) Performance of a simple aiming task in hypergravity: II. Detailed response characteristics. Aviat Space Environ Med 67:133–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bock O, Fowler B, Comfort D (2001) Human sensorimotor coordination during spaceflight: an analysis of pointing and tracking responses during the “Neurolab” space shuttle mission. Aviat Space Environ Med 72:877–883PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bock O, Weigelt C, Bloomberg JJ (2010) Cognitive demand of human sensorimotor performance during an extended space-mission: a dual-task study. Aviat Space Environ Med 81:819–824CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Clement G (2011) Fundamentals of space medicine, 2nd edn. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clement G, Reschke MF (2008) Neuroscience in space. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clément G, Berthoz A, Lestienne F (1987) Adaptive changes in perception of body orientation and mental image rotation in microgravity. Aviat Space Environ Med 58:A159–A163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen MM (2000) Perception of facial features and face-to-face communications in space. Aviat Space Environ Med 71:A51–A57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. de Schonen S, Leone G, Lipshits M (1998) The face inversion effect in microgravity: is gravity used as a spatial reference for complex object recognition? Acta Astronaut 42:287–301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Diamond A (2014) Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol 64:135–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eddy D, Schiflett S, Schlegel R, Shehab R (1998) Cognitive performance aboard the life and microgravity spacelab. Acta Astronaut 43:193–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellis SR (2000) Collision in space. Ergon Des 8:4–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fowler B, Bock O, Comfort D (2000) Is dual-task performance necessarily impaired in space? Hum Factors 42:318–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Friederici AD, Levelt WJM (1990) Spatial reference in weightlessness: perceptual factors and mental representations. Percept Psychophys 47:253–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Glasauer S, Mittelstaedt H (1998) Perception of spatial orientation in microgravity. Brain Res Rev 28:185–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hockey GRJ (1986) Changes in operator efficiency as a function of environmental stress, fatigue, and circadian rhythms. In: Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP (eds) Handbook of perception and performance. Vol II: Cognitive processes and performance. Wiley, New York, pp 44-1–44-49Google Scholar
  22. Jüngling S, Bock O (1999) Sensorimotor adaptation of humans to the space environment. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European symposium on the utilisation of the International Space Station (ESA SP-433). ESA, Noordwijk, pp 527–531Google Scholar
  23. Kanas N, Manzey D (2008) Space psychology and psychiatry. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelly TH, Hienz RD, Zarcone TJ, Wurster RM, Brady JV (2005) Crewmember performance before, during, and after spaceflight. J Exp Anal Behav 84:227–241CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Leone G (1998) The effect of gravity on human recognition of disoriented objects. Brain Res Rev 28:203–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Leone G, Lipshits M, Gurfinkel V, Berthoz A (1995a) Influence of graviceptive cues at different levels of visual information processing: the effects of prolonged weightlessness. Acta Astronaut 36:743–751CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Leone G, Lipshits M, Gurfinkel V, Berthoz A (1995b) Is there an effect of weightlessness on mental rotation of three-dimensional objects? Cogn Brain Res 2:255–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Limardo JG, Allen CS, Danielson RW (2015) Status: crew member noise exposures on the International Space Station. In: Proceedings of the 45th international conference on environmental systems, 12–16 July 2015, Bellevue, Washington. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20150011048.pdf. Last accessed 06 Nov 2016
  29. Manzey D (2000) Monitoring of mental performance during spaceflight. Aviat Space Environ Med 71:A69–A75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Manzey D, Lorenz B (1998) Mental performance during short-term and long-term spaceflight. Brain Res Rev 28:215–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Manzey D, Lorenz B, Schiewe A, Finell G, Thiele G (1993) Behavioral aspects of human adaptation to space: analyses of cognitive and psychomotor performance during an 8-days space mission. Clin Investig 71:725–731CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Manzey D, Lorenz B, Schiewe A, Finell G, Thiele G (1995) Dual-task performance in space: results from a single-case study during a short-term space mission. Hum Factors 37:667–681CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Manzey D, Lorenz B, Polyakov VV (1998) Mental performance in extreme environments: results from a performance monitoring study during a 438-day space mission. Ergonomics 41:537–559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Manzey D, Lorenz B, Heuer H, Sangals J (2000) Impairments of manual tracking performance in space: more converging evidence from a 20-day space mission. Ergonomics 43:589–609CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Monsell S (2003) Task switching. Trends Cogn Sci 7:134–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Morphew E, Balmer DV, Khoury GJ (2001) Human performance in space. Ergon Des 9:6–11Google Scholar
  37. Newberg AB (1994) Changes in the central nervous system and their clinical correlates during long-term space flight. Aviat Space Environ Med 65:562–572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Newman DJ, Lathan CE (1999) Memory processes and motor control in extreme environments. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber Part C Appl Rev 29:387–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oman CM (2007) Spatial orientation and navigation in microgravity. In: Mast F, Jancke L (eds) Spatial processing in navigation, imagery and perception. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 209–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pattyn N, Migeotte PF, Demaeseleer W, Kolinsky R, Morais J, Zizi M (2005) Investigating human cognitive performance during spaceflight. J Gravit Physiol 12:P39–P40Google Scholar
  41. Pozzo T, Papaxanthis C, Stapley P, Berthoz A (1998) The sensorimotor and cognitive integration of gravity. Brain Res Rev 28:92–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ratino DA, Repperger DW, Goodyear C, Potor G, Rodriguez LE (1988) Quantification of reaction time and time perception during Space Shuttle operations. Aviat Space Environ Med 59:220–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Sangals J, Heuer H, Manzey D, Lorenz B (1999) Changed visuomotor transformations during and after spaceflight. Exp Brain Res 129:378–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Schiflett S, Eddy D, Schlegel RE, French J, Shehab R (1995) Performance assessment workstation (PAWS). Unpublished final science report to NASAGoogle Scholar
  45. Shepard RN, Metzler J (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171:701–703CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sternberg S (1966) High-speed scanning in human memory. Science 153:652–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Strangman GE et al (2014) Human cognitive performance in spaceflight and analog environments. Aviat Space Environ Med 85:1033–1048CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Suedfeld P, Steel GD (2000) The environmental psychology of capsule habitats. Annu Rev Psychol 51:227–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Watt DGD (1997) Pointing at memorized targets during prolonged microgravity. Aviat Space Environ Med 68:99–103PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Psychology and Ergonomics, Engineering and Organisational PsychologyTechnische Universitaet BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options