Skip to main content

Are Wayfinding Self-efficacy and Pleasure in Exploring Related to Shortcut Finding? A Study in a Virtual Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10523))

Abstract

The analysis of individual factors supporting wayfinding ability is attracting increasing interest in the spatial cognition domain. The present study aimed to investigate whether two variables, wayfinding self-efficacy and pleasure in exploring, relate to shortcut-finding performance. A group of 124 university students were led along a route through one of two virtual environments that differed only in that one contained landmarks, while the other did not. Then they were asked to find a shortcut from the start to the end of the route they had learned. Two questionnaires were also administered to assess their wayfinding self-efficacy and pleasure in exploring. The results showed a better performance in the shortcut task for the environment containing landmarks. Individual differences correlated with shortcut-finding ability, but their predictive power was stronger in the without- than in the with-landmarks condition. The authors concluded that individual variables, such as wayfinding self-efficacy and a positive attitude to exploring, interact with environmental features (landmark availability) and relate to wayfinding performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bandura, A.: Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educ. Psychol. 28, 117–148 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandura, A.: Self-Efficacy: the Exercise of Control. Freeman, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caduff, D., Timpf, S.: On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation. Cogn. Process. 9, 249–267 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0199-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carlson, L.A., Hölscher, C., Shipley, T.F., Dalton, R.C.: Getting lost in buildings. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 19, 284–289 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410383243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Catalino, L.I., Algoe, S.B., Fredrickson, B.L.: Prioritizing positivity: An effective approach to pursuing happiness? Emotion 6, 1155–1161 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Condon, D.M., Wilt, J., Cohen, C.A., Revelle, W., Hegarty, M., Uttal, D.H.: Sense of direction: General factor saturation and associations with the Big-Five traits. Pers. Individ. Differ. 86, 38–43 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Denis, M., Mores, C., Gras, D., Gyselinck, V., Daniel, M.-P.: Is memory for routes enhanced by an environment’s richness in visual landmarks? Spat. Cogn. Comput. 14, 284–305 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2014.945586

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eccles, D.W., Walsh, S.E., Ingledew, D.K.: A grounded theory of expert cognition in orienteering. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 24, 68–88 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Foo, P., Duchon, A., Warren, W.H., Tarr, M.J.: Humans do not switch between path knowledge and landmarks when learning a new environment. Psychol. Res. 71, 240–251 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0080-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Foo, P., Warren, W.H., Duchon, A., Tarr, M.J.: Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- vs. landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Mem. Learn. 31, 195–215 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garland, E.L., Fredrickson, B., Kring, A.M., Johnson, D.P., Meyer, P.S., Penn, D.L.: Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: Insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 30, 849–864 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Golledge, R.G.: Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In: Golledge, R.G. (ed.) Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes, pp. 5–45. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harris, M.A., Wolbers, T.: Ageing effects on path integration and landmark navigation. Hippocampus 22, 1770–1780 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hegarty, M., Montello, D.R., Richardson, A.E., Ishikawa, T., Lovelace, T.: Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence 34, 151–176 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hegarty, M., Richardson, A.E., Montello, D.R., Lovelace, K., Subbiah, I.: Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence 30, 425–447 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00116-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hill, K.A.: Wayfinding and spatial reorientation by Nova Scotia deer hunters. Environ. Behav. 45, 267–282 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511420421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hund, A.M., Minarik, J.L.: Getting from here to there: Spatial anxiety, wayfinding strategies, direction type, and wayfinding efficiency. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 6, 179–201 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427633scc0603_1

    Google Scholar 

  18. Iaria, G., Burles, F.: Developmental topographical disorientation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 720–722 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jansen-Osmann, P., Fuchs, P.: Wayfinding behavior and spatial knowledge of adults and children in a virtual environment: The role of landmarks. Exp. Psychol. 53, 171–181 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.53.3.171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Janzen, G., Jansen, C., van Turennout, M.: Memory consolidation of landmarks in good navigators. Hippocampus 18, 40–47 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Janzen, G., Wagensveld, B., van Turennout, M.: Neural representation of navigational relevance is rapidly induced and long lasting. Cereb. Cortex 17, 975–981 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhl008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kearns, M.J., Warren, W.H., Duchon, A.P., Tarr, M.J.: Path integration from optic flow and body senses in a homing task. Perception 31, 349–374 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1068/p3311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kozlowski, L.T., Bryant, K.J.: Sense-of-direction, spatial orientation, and cognitive maps. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 3, 590–598 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.3.4.590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Labate, E., Pazzaglia, F., Hegarty, M.: What working memory subcomponents are needed in the acquisition of survey knowledge? Evidence from direction estimation and shortcut tasks. J. Environ. Psychol. 37, 73–79 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lawton, C.A.: Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles 30, 765–779 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lawton, C.A., Chrisler, J.C., McCreary, D.R.: Gender, spatial abilities, and wayfinding. In: Chrisler, J.C., McCreary, D.R. (eds.) Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology, pp. 317–341. Springer, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Lingwood, J., Blades, M., Farran, E.K., Courbois, Y., Matthews, D.: The development of wayfinding abilities in children: Learning routes with and without landmarks. J. Environ. Psychol. 41, 74–80 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Golledge, R.G., Philbeck, J.W.: Human navigation by path integration. In: Golledge, R.G. (ed.) Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes, pp. 125–151. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Maass, A., Cadinu, M.: Stereotype threat: When minority members underperform. In: Stroebe, W., Hewstone, M., Stroebe, W., Hewstone, M. (eds.) European Review of Social Psychology, vol. 14, pp. 243–275. Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis Hove, England (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Malucelli, E., Maass, A.: The development of spatial abilities: Growing up with or without cars. Bull. People-Environ. Stud. 18, 6–11 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Meilinger, T., Knauff, M., Bulthoff, H.H.: Working memory in wayfinding: A dual task experiment in a virtual city. Cogn. Sci. 32, 755–770 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802067004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Meneghetti, C., Zancada-Menéndez, C., Lopez, L., Sampedro-Piquero, P., Martinelli, M., Ronconi, L., Rossi, B.: Navigation and individual differences: The role of visuo-spatial abilities and working memory. Learn. Individ. Differ. 49, 314–322 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mischel, W., Shoda, Y.: A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychol. Rev. 102, 246–268 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mitolo, M., Gardini, S., Caffarra, P., Ronconi, L., Venneri, A., Pazzaglia, F.: Relationship between spatial ability, visuospatial working memory and self-assessed spatial orientation ability: A study in older adults. Cogn. Process. 16, 165–176 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0647-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moè, A., Pazzaglia, F.: Following the instructions! Effects of gender beliefs in mental rotation. Learn. Individ. Differ. 16, 369–377 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Montello, D.R.: Navigation. In: Shah, P., Miyake, A. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Visuo-Spatial Thinking, pp. 257–294. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Moritz, S.E., Feltz, D.L., Fahrbach, K.R., Mack, D.E.: The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: a meta-analytic review. Res. Q. Exer. Sport 71, 280–294 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2000.10608908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Muehl, K.A., Sholl, M.J.: The acquisition of vector knowledge and its relation to self-rated direction sense. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30, 129–141 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nori, R., Mercuri, N., Giusberti, F., Bensi, L., Gambetti, E.: Influences of gender role socialization and anxiety on spatial cognitive style. Am. J. Psychol. 122, 497–505 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pazzaglia, F., De Beni, R.: Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centred individuals. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 13, 493–508 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440042000124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pazzaglia, F., Poli, M., De Beni, R.: Orientamento e rappresentazione dello spazio. Orientation and representation of the space. Erickson, Trento (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pazzaglia, F., Taylor, H.A.: Perspective, instruction, and cognitive style in spatial representation of a virtual environment. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 7, 349–364 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/13875860701663223

    Google Scholar 

  43. Riecke, B.E., Van, Veen H.A.H.C., Bülthoff, H.H.: Visual homing is possible without landmarks: A path integration study in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 11, 443–473 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1162/105474602320935810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rissotto, A., Giuliani, M.V.: Learning neighbourhood environments: The loss of experience in a modern world. In: Spencer, C., Blades, M. (eds.) Children and their environments: Learning, using and designing spaces, pp. 75–90. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521232.006

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Roth, J.H.: Hōkō onchi: Wayfinding and the emergence of “directional tone-deafness” in Japan. Ethos 43, 402–422 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/etho.12098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ruddle, R.A., Payne, S.J., Jones, D.M.: Navigating buildings in ‘desk-top’ virtual environments: Experimental investigations using extended navigational experience. J. Exper. Psychol. Appl. 3, 143–159 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.3.2.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sameer, A., Bhushan, B.: Route memory in an unfamiliar homogeneous environment: a comparison of two strategies. Cogn. Process. 16, 149–152 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0677-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Schmitz, S.: Gender differences in aquisition of environmental knowledge related to wayfinding behavior, spatial anxiety and self-estimated environmental competencies. Sex Roles 41, 71–93 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018837808724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Schunk, D.H., Di Benedetto, M.K.: Academic self-efficacy. In: Furlong, M.J., Gilman, R., Huebner, E.S., Furlong, M.J., Gilman, R., Huebner, E.S. (eds.) Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools, pp. 115–130. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Srinivas, S.: Influence of motivation on wayfinding. Dissertation Abs. Inter. Sect. A 71, 2689 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Steele, C.M., Aronson, J.: A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance of women and African Americans. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69, 797–811 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Vandenberg, A.E.: Human wayfinding: Integration of mind and body. In: Hunter, R.H., Anderson, L.A. (eds.) Community Wayfinding: Pathways to Understanding, pp. 17–32. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31072-5_2

    Google Scholar 

  53. Walkowiak, S., Foulsham, T., Eardley, A.F.: Individual differences and personality correlates of navigational performance in the virtual route learning task. Comput. Hum. Behav. 45, 402–410 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wegman, J., Fonteijn, H.M., van Ekert, J., Tyborowska, A., Jansen, C., Janzen, G.: Gray and white matter correlates of navigational ability in humans. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 2561–2572 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Weisberg, S.M., Schinazi, V.R., Newcombe, N.S., Shipley, T.F., Epstein, R.A.: Variations in cognitive maps: Understanding individual differences in navigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 40, 669–682 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wen, W., Ishikawa, T., Sato, T.: Working memory in spatial knowledge acquisition: Differences in encoding processes and sense of direction. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 25, 654–662 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wiener, J.M., Büchner, S.J., Hölscher, C.: Taxonomy of human wayfinding tasks: A knowledge-based approach. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 9, 152–165 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13875860902906496

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wolbers, T., Hegarty, M.: What determines our navigational abilities? Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 138–146 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Yang, Y., Merrill, E.C.: Cognitive and personality characteristics of masculinity and femininity predict wayfinding competence and strategies of men and women. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0626-x. (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Pazzaglia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pazzaglia, F., Meneghetti, C., Labate, E., Ronconi, L. (2017). Are Wayfinding Self-efficacy and Pleasure in Exploring Related to Shortcut Finding? A Study in a Virtual Environment. In: Barkowsky, T., Burte, H., Hölscher, C., Schultheis, H. (eds) Spatial Cognition X. Spatial Cognition KogWis 2016 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10523. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68189-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68189-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68188-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68189-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics