Skip to main content

The Design of a Modeling Technique to Analyze the Impact of Process Simulation Throughout the Business Architecture

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation (EOMAS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 298))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Simulation techniques offer a cost-effective solution to support the experimental analysis of possible business process improvements. However, the performance indicators that are used for this analysis exclusively focus on operational aspects. Consequently, the impact of process changes on the overall business performance is not taken into account. This problem can be solved by the development of a modeling technique that combines the provision of a coherent view on both the organizational strategy and business processes with a mechanism to analyze the impact of the simulated operational performance on indicators that reflect the overall business performance. This paper presents the proof-of-concept design of such a technique, which is the result of a first cycle of Design Science Research. This also includes the demonstration of the modeling technique by the bakery case example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Church, K., Smith, R.: REA ontology-based simulation models for enterprise strategic planning. JIS 22(2), 301–329 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fill, H., Karagiannis, D.: On the conceptualisation of modelling methods using the ADOxx meta modelling platform. EMISA 1(8), 4–25 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: Value-based requirements engineering: exploring innovative e-Commerce ideas. Requir. Eng. 8(2), 114–134 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Green, P., Rao, V.: Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgemental data. J. Mark. Res. 8(3), 355–363 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hafeez, K., Zhang, Y., Malak, N.: Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 76(1), 39–51 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horkoff, J., Barone, D., Jiang, L., Yu, E., Amyot, D., Borgida, A., Mylopoulos, J.: Strategic business modeling: representation and reasoning. Softw. Syst. Model. 13(3), 1015–1041 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaplan, R., Norton, D.: The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus. Rev., 71–79 (January–February 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kettinger, W., Teng, J., Guha, S.: Business process change: a study of methodologies, techniques, and tools. MIS Q. 21(1), 55–80 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, New York (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29651-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Laurier, W., Poels, G.: Invariant conditions in value system simulation models. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 275–287 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maes, R.: An integrative perspective on information management. In: Huizing, A., De Vries, E. (eds.) Information Management: Setting the Scene, pp. 11–28. Elsevier Science, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McCarthy, W.: The REA accounting model: a generalized framework for accounting systems in a shared data environment. Account. Rev. 57, 554–578 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neely, A., Adams, C., Kennerley, M.: The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success. FT Prentice-Hall, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. OMG: Business Architecture Body of Knowledge Handbook v.2.0 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roelens, B., Poels, G.: Towards an integrative component framework for business models: identifying the common elements between the current business model views. In: Deneckère, R., Proper, H. (eds.) CAiSE 2013 Forum, pp. 114–121, Valencia (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roelens, B., Poels, G.: The creation of business architecture heat maps to support strategy-aligned organizational decisions. In: Devos, J., De Haes, S. (eds.) ECIME 2014, pp. 388–392, Academy Conferences Ltd. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roelens, B., Steenacker, W., Poels, G.: Realizing strategic fit within the business architecture: the design of a process-goal alignment modeling and analysis technique. Softw. Syst. Model. (2017, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saaty, T.: How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48(1), 9–26 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Sein, M., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35(1), 37–56 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. The Open Group: TOGAF v.9.1 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tumay, K.: Business process simulation. In: Alexopoulos, A., et al. (eds.) WSC 1995, pp. 55–60. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. van der Aalst, W., Nakatumba, J., Rozinat, A., Russell, N.: Business process simulation: how to get it right? In: Computer science reports, vol. 0821. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wieringa, R.: Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Roelens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Roelens, B., Poels, G. (2017). The Design of a Modeling Technique to Analyze the Impact of Process Simulation Throughout the Business Architecture. In: Pergl, R., Lock, R., Babkin, E., Molhanec, M. (eds) Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation. EOMAS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 298. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68185-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68185-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68184-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68185-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics