Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laos: The Transformation of Periphery Socialism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comparative Politics of Southeast Asia

Abstract

As a landlocked country with a sparsely populated hinterland, politicized ethnic identities, and a history of a weak central power, Laos struggles with unfavorable circumstances for economic development and is a case of peripheral socialism. Since the mid-1980s, the LPRP has de facto abandoned its socialist experiment and is searching for new sources of legitimacy. It is no longer a revolutionary party striving to realize a utopian communist society but has become a ruling party looking to perpetuate its rule and stabilize the political status quo. Today, opaque decision-making procedures persist and weak government revenues due to inefficient institutions, widespread tax evasion, and persistent corruption have resulted in weak administrative capacity and a low quality of public services. This has limited the government’s ability to provide the wider population with public goods like universal access to education and health and social security, amplifying problems of socioeconomic inequality. The privatization of state enterprises owned by the military, party cadres, or their family members; legal reforms in order to strengthen government accountability and rule of law; and a conclusive anti-corruption policy are pressing challenges for political and economic transformation. However, reforms in these areas would threaten opportunities for self-enrichment by those elites whose political loyalty is essential for regime survival—especially cadre capitalists, military officers, and co-opted businessmen—and are therefore unlikely to succeed. This chapter provides a systematic overview of the political actors, institutions, and dynamics of Laos’ political system and summarizes its history and recent developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The others are Vietnam, Cuba, North Korea, and the People’s Republic of China. Throughout this chapter, “communism” and “socialism” are used interchangeably.

  2. 2.

    Lao are members of the country’s majority ethnic group, whereas Laotian encompasses all citizens of Laos (Schneider 2001).

  3. 3.

    Of course, in reality, the collective leadership principle has often been superseded by the dominance of personalist leaders like Josef Stalin in the Soviet Union or Mao Zedong in the People’s Republic of China.

  4. 4.

    The average subnational share of government expenditure in autocracies is 17.76% in the period 1972–2000; for government revenue it is 14.05% (Landry 2008, p. 6).

  5. 5.

    Overall, poverty rates are twice as high among minorities compared to ethnic Lao (Government of Lao PDR and United Nations 2013, p. 202).

  6. 6.

    The others are Brunei, Myanmar, and Timor-Leste.

References

  • Backes, U. (2016). ‘Ideocracy’: A sketch on the history of a concept. In U. Backes & S. Kailitz (Eds.), Ideocracies in comparison: Legitimation - co-optation - repression (pp. 13–39). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, I. (2010). Quotas, powers, patronage and illegal rent seeking: The political economy of logging and the timber trade in Southern Laos. Washington: Forest Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdet, Y. (1997). Laos in 1996: Please don’t rush! Asian Survey, 37, 72–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brocheux, P., & Hémery, D. (2011). Indochina: An ambiguous colonization 1858–1954. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BTI. (2014). Laos country report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • BTI. (2016). Bertelsmann transformation index 2016. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, W. M. (2005). Laos: Learning to live with the outside world. In W. M. Carpenter & D. G. Wiencek (Eds.), Asian security handbook: Terrorism and the new security environment (3rd ed., pp. 160–166). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA. (2017). The world factbook. Langley: Central Intelligence Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creak, S. (2011). Party congress and national assembly elections in Laos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, A. (2014). Ways of constitution-making in Southeast Asia: Actors, interests, dynamics. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 36, 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs36-1b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov, M. K. (2013). Understanding communist collapse and resilience. In M. K. Dimitrov (Ed.), Why communism did not collapse: Understanding authoritarian regime resilience in Asia and Europe (pp. 3–39). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elkins, Z., Melton, J., & Ginsburg, T. (2009). The endurance of national constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • EU FLEGT Facility. (2011). Baseline study 2, LAO PDR: Overview of forest governance, markets and trade. Kuala Lumpur: EU FLEGT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1998). The politics of ritual and remembrance: Laos since 1975. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2002). A short history of Laos: The land in between (Short histories of Asia). Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, S. E. (Ed.). (1979). Five constitutions: Contrasts and comparisons. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, E. (1985). The problem of balance in the peripheral socialist economy: A conceptual note. World Development, 13, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(85)90063-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. (2015). Freedom of the press index 2014: Harsh laws and violence drive global decline. Accessed June 2, 2017, from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/freedom-press-2015

  • Freeman, N. (2006). Laos: Timid transition. In N. J. Funston (Ed.), Government and politics in Southeast Asia (2nd ed.). Singapore: ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, S. (2012). The Lao federation of trade unions: A classic dualist union. International Journal of Employment Studies, 20(2), 32–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, J., & Lust-Okar, E. (2009). Elections under authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060106.095434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerschewski, J., Merkel, W., Schmotz, A., Stefes, C., & Tanneberg, D. (2013). Warum überleben Diktaturen? In S. Kailitz & P. Köllner (Eds.), Autokratien im Vergleich (Politische Vierteljahresschrift : Sonderheft, Vol. 47). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, T., & Simpser, A. (2014). Introduction: Constitution in authoritarian regimes. In T. Ginsburg & A. Simpser (Eds.), Constitutions in authoritarian regimes, Comparative constitutional law and policy (1st ed., pp. 1–21). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Lao PDR, & United Nations. (2013). The millennium development goals progress report for the Lao PDR 2013. New York: United Nations Development Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, G. C. (2007). Laos in 2006: Changing of the guard. Asian Survey, 47, 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2007.47.1.183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, C. (2001). Laos. In D. Nohlen, F. Grotz, & C. Hartmann (Eds.), Elections in Asia and the pacific: A data handbook, Volume II: South East Asia, East Asia, and the South Pacific (pp. 129–143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heberer, T. (n.d.) Das politische System der VR China im Prozess des Wandels (pp. 39–233).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgdon, B. (2008). Frontier country: The political culture of logging and development on the periphery in Laos. Kyoto Journal, 69, 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • IISS. (2014). The military balance 2014: International Institute for Strategic Studies. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Internet World Stats. (2017). Internet usage statistics: World internet users and 2017 population stats. https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

  • IPU. (2014). Interparliamentary union parline database Lao People’s Republic. Accessed June 20, 2017, from http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/arc/2175_06.htm

  • Johnson, S. T. (1992). Laos in 1991: Year of the constitution. Asian Survey, 32, 82–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson, K. (2011). Elections but no ‘flower revolution’ in Laos. Lund: Asia Portal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, G. (2012). Nascent civil society in Lao PDR in the shadow of China’s economic presence. In H. Moksnes & M. Melin (Eds.), Global civil society: Shifting powers in a shifting world (pp. 154–157). Uppsala: Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, P. F. (2008). Decentralized authoritarianism in China: The Communist Party’s control of local elites in the post-Mao era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lao Statistics Bureau. (2005). Population census 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leather, G. (2008). Laos – A constitution in search of Constitutionalism. In C. Hill & J. Menzel (Eds.), Constitutionalism in Southeast Asia 2: Reports on national constitutions (pp. 123–160). Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintner, B. (2008). Laos: At the crossroads. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2008(1), 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LWU. (2011). Lao women’s union. Accessed July 21, 2015, from http://laowomenunion.org.la/index.php?option=com_jdownloads&Itemid=0&view=finish&cid=5&catid=7&m=0&lang=en

  • Magaloni, B. (2006). Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malesky, E., Schuler, P., & Tran, A. (2011). Vietnam: Familiar patterns and new developments ahead of the 11th party congress. Southeast Asian Affairs, 337–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • MPI. (2011). The seventh five-year national socio-economic development plan (2011–2015). Vientiane: Ministry of Planning and Investment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, A., & LeoGrande, W. M. (1982). The party in uniform: Toward a theory of civil-military relations in communist political systems. American Political Science Review, 76, 778–789. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400189609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pholsena, V. (2006). Post-war Laos: The politics of culture, history, and identity. Singapore: ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pholsena, V. (2012). Laos. In M. J. Montesano & L. P. Onn (Eds.), Regional outlook: Southeast Asia 2012–2013 (pp. 59–63). Singapore: ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (2014). Ruling against rules. In T. Ginsburg & A. Simpser (Eds.), Constitutions in authoritarian regimes, Comparative constitutional law and policy (1st ed., pp. 21–35). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehbein, B. (2010). Globalization, culture and society in Laos. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reporters without Borders. (2017). 2017 World press freedom index. RSF. Accessed June 22, 2017, from https://rsf.org/en/ranking

  • Schmidt, M. G. (2010). Demokratietheorien: Eine Einführung (5th ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. (2001). Laos im 20. Jahrhundert: Kolonie und Königreich, Befreite Zone und Volksrepublik. Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Südostasien Working Papers Nr. 21. Berlin: Humboldt Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sida. (2004). Governance and participation in Laos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soukamneuth, B. (2006). The political economy of transition in Laos: From peripheral socialism to the margins of global capital. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • St John, R. B. (2006). The political economy of Laos: Poor state or poor policy? Asian Affairs, 37, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068370600661466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart-Fox, M. (1997). A history of Laos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart-Fox, M. (2002). Buddhist kingdom, Marxist state: The making of modern Laos (2nd ed.). Bangkok: White Lotus Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart-Fox, M. (2005). Politics and reform in the Lao people’s democratic republic: Asia research centre working paper 126. Perth: Murdoch University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart-Fox, M. (2008). Historical dictionary of Laos (3rd ed.). Lanham: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart-Fox, M. (2009a). Laos: The Chinese connection. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2009(1), 141–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart-Fox, M. (2009b). Political culture and power in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Lao Study Review, 3, 222–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart-Fox, M. (2009c). Politics and reform in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Asia research centre working paper 126. Perth: Murdoch University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. Y. L. (2002). The making and remaking of constitutions in Southeast Asia: An overview. Singapore Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2002(6), 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappe, O. (2008). Geschichte, Nationsbildung und Legitimationspolitik in Laos: Untersuchungen zur laotischen nationalen Historiographie und Ikonographie. Münster: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thammavong, V. (2005). Role of the Lao people’s revolutionary youth union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, C. (2003). Laos in 2002: Regime maintenance through political stability. Asian Survey, 43, 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2003.43.1.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. (2015). Corruption perception index. Accessed June 1, 2017, from https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2016

  • UNDP. (2005). Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Public administration country profile. Division for Public Administration and Development Management (DPADM) Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) United Nations. New York: United Nations Development Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaenkeo, S. (2016). Laos’s 10th Congress elects new party leadership: Vientiane times through Asia News Network. http://annx.asianews.network/content/laos%E2%80%99-10th-congress-elects-new-party-leadership-8075

  • World Bank. (2007). Lao PDR public expenditure review: Integrated fiduciary assessment. Report No. 39791-LA. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2017a). World development indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi

  • World Bank. (2017b). Worldwide governance indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/worldwide-governance-indicators

  • Yokoyama, S. (2010). Lao health master planning study progress report 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zasloff, J. (1973). The pathet leo: Leadership and organization. Toronto: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Political Science, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

    Aurel Croissant & Philip Lorenz

Authors
  1. Aurel Croissant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philip Lorenz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Croissant, A., Lorenz, P. (2018). Laos: The Transformation of Periphery Socialism. In: Comparative Politics of Southeast Asia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68182-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation