Abstract
Vietnam is a communist one-party regime in transition. With the implementation of doi moi, the Communist Party of Vietnam replaced a centrally planned economy with a “socialist-oriented market economy.” The transition from a fully planned economy to a mixed economy generated dynamic economic growth and socioeconomic modernization that puts the Communist Party in a potentially vulnerable position. The Party has reacted resolutely against any demands for political liberalization or a more open political process. Overall, it appears that the communist rulers have successfully adapted the pillars of regime stability to changing international and domestic contexts. The strategy of economic transformation and institutional innovation has enabled the CPV to keep its regime coalition together and to reconcile increasingly diverse sectoral and regional interests. Today, the CPV is no longer a revolutionary party striving for a utopian socialist ideal, but a bureaucratic party seeking to preserve the political status quo. Three decades of reform have generated conflict between the government and society in general, within the Party, and within different social groups in various forms, indicated by a steadily growing number of protests since the late 1990s. But even with these challenges, communist party rule in Vietnam appears resilient and adaptive. This chapter provides a systematic overview of the political actors, institutions, and dynamics of Vietnam’s political system and summarizes its history and recent developments.
Notes
- 1.
South Vietnam also had three constitutions, proclaimed in 1956, 1964, and 1967, respectively.
- 2.
This effect is, of course, weaker in a parliament with no opposition than in multiparty legislatures (Gandhi 2008). Moreover, the mass organizations of the party, the structural amalgamation of party and state, and the alignment of cadre and economic interests provide a more effective way to allocate economic rents than the National Assembly (Schuler and Malesky 2014).
- 3.
- 4.
Wintrobe (2009, p. 366) explains the dilemma as follows: “The use of repression of course breeds fear on the part of a dictator’s subjects, and this fear breeds reluctance on the part of the citizenry to signal displeasure with the dictator’s policies. This fear on their part in turn breeds fear on the part of the dictator, since, not knowing what the population thinks of his policies, he has no way of knowing what they are thinking and planning, and of course he suspects that what they are thinking and planning is his assassination. The problem is magnified the more the dictator rules by repression, i.e., through fear. The more his repressive apparatus stifles dissent and criticism, the less he knows how much support he really has among the population.”
- 5.
The VGCL is organized into territorial and sectoral unions. There are about 100,000 workplace unions with 5.7 million members in the 63 provinces and cities; in addition, the 20 sector unions have a membership of about 1.58 million, organized into 6400 workplace unions.
References
Abrami, R., Malesky, E., & Yu, Z. (2013). Vietnam through Chinese eyes: Divergent accountability in single-party regimes. In M. K. Dimitrov (Ed.), Why communism did not collapse: Understanding authoritarian regime resilience in Asia and Europe (pp. 237–275). New York: Cambridge University Press.
ABS. (2017). Asian barometer survey: Electronic data release for Wave 4, 2014–2016. http://www.asianbarometer.org/data/data-release
Abuza, Z. (2001). Renovating politics in contemporary Vietnam. London: Lynne Rienner.
Abuza, Z., & Anh, N. N. (2016). Little fallout: Vietnam’s security policy after the 12th congress of the Vietnam communist party. Center for International Maritime Security. Accessed June 2, 2017, from http://cimsec.org/21720-2/21720
Bergstermann, J., & Geiger, A. (2011). Vietnam im Superwahljahr: Das Durchsteuern wird schwieriger. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.
Besley, T., & Kudamatsu, M. (2007). Making autocracy work (Development Economics Discussion Paper Series). London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
Blanc, M.-E. (2004). An emerging civil society? Local associations working on HIV/AIDS. In D. McCargo (Ed.), Rethinking Vietnam (pp. 153–165). London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Brocheux, P., & Hémery, D. (2011). Indochina: An ambiguous colonization 1858–1954. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Brooker, P. (1995). Twentieth century dictatorships: The ideological one-party states. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Brunner, G. (1978). Die Funktion der Verfassung in den sozialistischen Staaten im Spiegel der neueren Verfassungsgebung. In F.-C. Schroeder & B. Meissner (Eds.), Verfassungs- und Verwaltungsreformen in den sozialistischen Staaten (pp. 11–43). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
BTI. (2014). Bertelsmann transformation index 2014. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation.
Case, W. (2016). Vietnam in 2015: Factional battles, economic tailwinds, and neighborhood jitters. Asian Survey, 56, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2016.56.1.93.
CECODES, VFF-CRT, & UNDP. (2014). The Viet Nam governance and Public Administration Performance Index (PAPI) 2013: Measuring citizens’ experiences. A Joint Policy Research Paper. Hanoi: Center for Community Support and Development Studies; Centre for Research and Training of the Viet Nam Fatherland Front; United Nations Development Program.
CECODES, VFF-CRT, & UNDP. (2016). The Viet Nam provincial governance and Public Administration Performance Index (PAPI) 2015: Measuring citizens’s experiences. A Joint Policy Research Paper. Hanoi: Center for Community Support and Development Studies; Centre for Research and Training of the Viet Nam Fatherland Front; United Nations Development Program.
Chang, A., Chu, Y.-h., & Welsh, B. (2013). Southeast Asia: Sources of regime support. Journal of Democracy, 24, 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0025.
CIA. (2017). The World Factbook. Langley: Central Intelligence Agency.
Collins, N., Sitalaksmi, S., & Lansbury, R. (2013). Transforming employment relations in Vietnam and Indonesia: Case studies of state-owned enterprises. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51, 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00056.x.
Desai, R. M., Olofsgard, A., & Yousef, T. M. (2009). The logic of authoritarian bargains. Economics and Politics, 21, 93–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2008.00337.x.
Dimitrov, M. K. (2013). Understanding communist collapse and resilience. In M. K. Dimitrov (Ed.), Why communism did not collapse: Understanding authoritarian regime resilience in Asia and Europe (pp. 3–39). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, C. (2004). State, party and political change in Vietnam. In D. McCargo (Ed.), Rethinking Vietnam (pp. 15–26). London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Elliott, D. W. P. (2012). Changing worlds: Vietnam’s transition from the Cold War to globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fforde, A. (2013). Vietnam in 2012. Asian Survey, 53, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2013.53.1.101.
Freedom House. (2015). Freedom of the Press Index 2014: Harsh laws and violence drive global decline. Accessed June 2, 2017, from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/freedom-press-2015
Fritzen, S. (2009). The ‘Misery’ of implementation: Governance, institutions, and anti-corruption in Vietnam. In N. Tarling (Ed.), Corruption and good governance in Asia (pp. 98–120). London: Routledge.
Gainsborough, M. (2005). Party control: Electoral campaigning in Vietnam in the Run-up to the May 2002 National Assembly Elections. Pacific Affairs, 78(1), 57–75.
Gainsborough, M. (2010). Vietnam: Rethinking the state. London: Zed Books.
Gandhi, J. (2008). Political institutions under dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gillespie, J. (2006). Evolving concepts of human rights in Vietnam. In R. P. Peerenboom, C. J. Petersen, & A. H. Y. Chen (Eds.), Human rights in Asia: A comparative legal study of twelve Asian jurisdictions, France and the USA (pp. 487–517). London: Routledge.
Gillespie, J. (2017). Transplanting commercial law reform: Developing a ‘rule of law’ in Vietnam. London: Routledge.
Grimm, D. (2013). Types of constitutions. In M. Rosenfeld & A. Sajó (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law (pp. 98–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
GSOV. (2014). Statistical yearbook of Vietnam 2013. Hanoi: General Statistics Office of Viet Nam.
Hale, H. E. (2013). Regime change cascades: What we have learned from the 1848 revolutions to the 2011 Arab uprisings. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-212204.
Hartmann, C. (2001). Vietnam: A data handbook. In D. Nohlen, F. Grotz, & C. Hartmann (Eds.), Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A data handbook, Vol. II: South East Asia, East Asia, and the South Pacific (pp. 321–343). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hill, C. (2008). Vietnam: Constitutional development in a re-united country. In C. Hill & J. Menzel (Eds.), Constitutionalism in Southeast Asia: Vol. 1: National constitutions/ASEAN charter (pp. 327–355). Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
IISS. (2014). The military balance 2014: International institute for strategic studies. London: Oxford University Press.
IISS. (2017). The military balance 2017: International institute for strategic studies. London: Oxford University Press.
IPU. (2016). Inter-parliamentary Union parline database Vietnam. Accessed June 2, 2017, from http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2349_E.htm
Jandl, T. (2013). Vietnam in the global economy: The dynamics of integration, decentralization, and contested politics. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Kerkvliet, B. J. (2014). Government repression and toleration of dissidents in contemporary Vietnam. In J. D. London (Ed.), Politics in contemporary Vietnam: Party, state and authority relations (pp. 100–134). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kerkvliet, B. J. (2015). Democracy and Vietnam. In W. Case (Ed.), Routledge handbook of Southeast Asian democratization (pp. 426–441). London: Routledge.
Koh, D. (2012). Vietnam: A glass half full or half empty? Southeast Asian Affairs, 361–378.
Le Hiep, H. (2012). Performance-based Legitimacy: The case of the communist party of Vietnam and Doi Moi. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A journal of international and strategic affairs, 34(2), 145–172.
Le Hiep, H. (2014). The communist party of Vietnam: A party in transition. In W. Sachsenröder (Ed.), Party politics in Southeast Asia: Organization, money, influence (pp. 346–409). Singapore: ISEAS.
London, J. D. (2004). Rethinking Vietnam’s mass education and health systems. In D. McCargo (Ed.), Rethinking Vietnam (pp. 127–143). London: RoutledgeCurzon.
London, J. D. (2014). Politics in contemporary Viet Nam. In J. D. London (Ed.), Politics in contemporary Vietnam: Party, state and authority relations (pp. 1–20). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Malesky, E. (2014). Understanding the confidence vote in Vietnam: An update on ‘Adverse Effects of Sunshine’. In J. D. London (Ed.), Politics in contemporary Vietnam: Party, state and authority relations (pp. 84–100). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Malesky, E., & Paul, S. (2011). The single-party dictator’s dilemma: Information in elections without opposition. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36, 491–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00025.x.
Malesky, E., & Schuler, P. (2013). Star search: Do elections help nondemocratic regimes identify new leaders? Journal of East Asian Studies, 13, 35–69.
Malesky, E., Schuler, P., & Tran, A. (2011). Vietnam: Familiar patterns and new developments ahead of the 11th party congress. Southeast Asian Affairs, 337–363.
Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2011). Fiscal decentralization in Asia: Challenges and opportunities. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
Menge, J. (2011). Zivilgesellschaft in Vietnam: Ein westlich-demokratisches Konzept auf dem Prüfstand. Berlin: Regiospectra.
Mensel, N. (2012). Der Entwicklungsprozess der Sozialistischen Republik Vietnam: Erfolge und Herausforderungen durch staatlich gelenkte Entwicklung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Nguyen, T. H. (2012). Pursuing constitutional dialogue within socialist Vietnam: The 2010 debate. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 13(1), 1–18.
Nguyen, T. T. (2013). The World Trade Organization’s (WTO) impact on the policy and the law of Vietnam from 2007 onwards. ASLI Working Paper Series(WPS029).
Nguyen, N. H., & Ta, V. T. (1987). The Lê code law in traditional Vietnam: A comparative Sino-Vietnamese legal study with historical-juridical analysis and annotations. Athens: Ohio University Press.
Nicholson, P. (2016). Vietnamese constitutionalism: The reform possibilities. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 11, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2016.18.
Nørlund, I. (2007, October). Civil society in Vietnam: Social organizations and approaches to new concepts. Asien, 105, 68–90.
Perlmutter, A., & LeoGrande, W. M. (1982). The party in uniform: Toward a theory of civil-military relations in communist political systems. American Political Science Review, 76, 778–789. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400189609.
Pollack, D. (2004). Zivilgesellschaft und Staat in der Demokratie. In K. Kern & B. Geißel (Eds.), Zivilgesellschaft und Sozialkapital: Herausforderungen politischer und sozialer Integration (Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie, Vol. 14).
Porter, G. (2009). Vietnam: The politics of bureaucratic socialism (2nd ed.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Reporters without Borders. (2017). 2017 World Press Freedom Index. RSF. Accessed June 22, 2017, from https://rsf.org/en/ranking
Schirokauer, C., & Clark, D. N. (2004). Modern East Asia: A brief history. South Melbourne: Thomson.
Schuler, P., & Malesky, E. (2014). Authoritarian legislatures. In S. Martin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of legislative studies (pp. 676–695). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sidel, M. (2008). Law and society in Vietnam: The transition from socialism in comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stockwell, A. J. (1999). Southeast Asia in war and peace: The end of European colonial empiries. In N. Tarling (Ed.), Cambridge history of Southeast Asia: Vol. II Part 2: From World War II to the present (pp. 1–58). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thayer, C. A. (1988). The regularization of politics: Continuity and change in the party’s central committee, 1951–1986. In D. G. Marr (Ed.), Postwar Vietnam: Dilemmas in socialist development (pp. 177–193). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Thayer, C. A. (1994). The Vietnam people’s army under Doi Moi. Singapore: ISEAS.
Thayer, C. A. (1998). Vietnam. In W. Sachsenröder & U. E. Frings (Eds.), Political party systems and democratic development in East and Southeast Asia: Vol. I: Southeast Asia (pp. 449–509). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Thayer, C. A. (2000). The economic and commercial roles of the Vietnam people’s army. Asian Perspective, 24(2), 87–120.
Thayer, C. A. (2010). Political legitimacy in Vietnam: Challenge and response. Politics & Policy, 38, 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00242.x.
Thayer, C. A. (2013). Military politics in contemporary Vietnam: Political engagement, corporate interests, and professionalism. In M. Mietzner (Ed.), The political resurgence of the military in Southeast Asia: Conflict and leadership (pp. 63–84). New York: Routledge.
Thayer, C. A. (2014a). The apparatus of authoritarian rule in Vietnam. In J. D. London (Ed.), Politics in contemporary Vietnam: Party, state and authority relations (pp. 135–162). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Thayer, C. A. (2014b). Vietnam in 2013: Domestic contestation and foreign policy success. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2014(1), 355–372.
Thayer, C. A. (2015). Vietnam: An analysis of politburo and secretariat voet of confidence. Thayer Consultancy Background Briefing. https://www.scribd.com/document/253021090/Thayer-Vietnam-Results-of-Politburo-Vote-of-Confidence
Tran, T. B. (2014). The cycle of transparency, accountability, corruption, and administrative performance: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Development, 16(3), 32–48.
Truex, R. (2014). The returns to office in a “Rubber Stamp” parliament. American Political Science Review, 108, 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000112.
Tucker, S. (1999). Vietnam. London: UCL Press.
UNDP. (2004). The socialist Republic of Viet Nam public administration country profile. Accessed June 6, 2017, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan023247.pdf
Vasavakul, T. (1995). Vietnam: The changing models of legitimation. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Political legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The quest for moral authority (pp. 257–291). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Vasavakul, T. (2001). From revolutionary heroes to red entrepreneurs. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Coercion and governance: The declining political role of the military in Asia (pp. 336–356). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Vasavakul, T. (2006). Vietnam: Doi Moi difficulties. In N. J. Funston (Ed.), Government and politics in Southeast Asia (2nd ed., pp. 372–410). Singapore: ISEAS.
Vasavakul, T. (2014). Authoritarianism reconfigured: Evolving accountability relations within Vietnam’s one-party rule. In J. D. London (Ed.), Politics in contemporary Vietnam: Party, state and authority relations (pp. 42–64). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vietnam Breaking News. (2017). Vietnam’s top telecom firm Viettel to expand to Indonesia. Accessed June 2, 2017, from https://www.vietnambreakingnews.com/tag/vietnam-military-telecom-group-viettel/
Vietnam Business Forum. (2014). Military enterprises: Defending and developing Vietnam’s economy. Accessed June 6, 2017, from http://vccinews.com/news_detail.asp?news_id=29950
Vo, D. H. (2005). Fiscal decentralisation in Vietnam: A preliminary investigation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23697435_Fiscal_Decentralisation_in_Vietnam_a_Preliminary_Investigation
Vu, T. (2014). Persistence amid decay: The communist party of Vietnam at 83. In J. D. London (Ed.), Politics in contemporary Vietnam: Party, state and authority relations (pp. 21–40). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vuving, A. L. (2013). Vietnam in 2012: A rent-seeking state on the verge of a crisis. Southeast Asian Affairs, 325–347.
Wagstaff, J. (2010). Southeast Asian media: Patterns of production and consumption. Accessed June 6, 2017, from https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/production-consumption-20100212.pdf
Welzel, C. (2013). Freedom rising: Human empowerment and the quest for emancipation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. F. (2009). Mass beliefs and democratic institutions. In C. Boix & S. C. Stokes (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative politics (pp. 297–316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wintrobe, R. (2009). Dictatorship: Analytical approaches. In C. Boix & S. C. Stokes (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative politics (pp. 363–397). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wischermann, J. (2013). Zivilgesellschaften als Stütze autoritärer Regime: Das Fallbeispiel Vietnam. In S. Kailitz & P. Köllner (Eds.), Autokratien im Vergleich (Vol. 47, Politische Vierteljahresschrift: Sonderheft ed., pp. 324–354). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
World Bank. (2017a). World development indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi
World Bank. (2017b). Worldwide governance indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/worldwide-governance-indicators
Wurfel, D. (1967). Preliminary report of Vietnam election observer for methodist peace division, SANE, friends committee on National Legislation, and Unitarian Universalist Association. Washington.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Croissant, A., Lorenz, P. (2018). Vietnam: The Socialist Party State. In: Comparative Politics of Southeast Asia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68182-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68182-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68181-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68182-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)