Skip to main content

From Precaution to Prejudice: Mistakes in Counter-terrorism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Mistakes and Policy Failures in International Relations

Abstract

This chapter disaggregates the mistakes, errors and miscalculations around counter-terrorism policy. We note the difficulties in assessing when ‘something goes wrong’ in counter-terrorism which centre around the issue of uncertainty. We reflect on how to calculate the impacts of counter-terrorism in objective and subjective terms, before considering specific aspects of counter-terrorism in examples from British counter-terrorism policing and measures. We distinguish three types of ‘mistakes’: ‘genuine’ errors, misapplication of policy and unintended consequences. We consider the effects of such mistakes, in the form of ‘suspect communities’ and the ways in which high-profile mistakes come to shape perceptions of counter-terrorism practices. Given the inherent uncertainty and the seeming decision to prioritise precautionary logics, ‘mistakes’ in counter-terrorism are inevitable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ali, Nadya. 2015. Mapping the Muslim Community: The Politics of Counter-Radicalisation in Britain. In Counter-Radicalisation: Critical Perspectives, ed. Christopher Baker-Beall, Charlotte Heath-Kelly, and Jarvis Lee, 139–155. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aradau, Claudia, and Rens van Munster. 2007. Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations 13 (1): 89–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. 2004. Blair Terror Speech in Full. BBC News, March 5. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3536131.stm. 24 Nov 2016.

  • Bovens, Mark, Paul ‘t Hart, and B. Guy Peters. 1998. Explaining Policy Disasters in Europe. In Public Policy Disasters in Europe, ed. Paul ‘t Hart and Pat Gray, 195–214. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen Smyth, Marie. 2009. Subjectivities, ‘Suspect Communities’, Governments, and the Ethics of Research on ‘Terrorism’. In Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda, ed. Richard Jackson, Marie Breen Smyth, and Jeroen Gunning, 194–215. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronitt, Simon, and Bernadette McSherry. 2010. Principles of Criminal Law. New York: Thomson Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Paul. 2009. “Hearts and Minds”? British Counter-Insurgency Strategy in Northern Ireland. Journal of Strategic Studies 32 (3): 445–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dongen, Teun W. 2011. Break It Down: An Alternative Approach to Measuring Effectiveness in Counterterrorism. Journal of Applied Security Research 6 (3): 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, Frank. 2015. Countering Terrorism in Britain and France: Institutions, Norms and the Shadow of the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, Marie. 2007. Security, Media and Multicultural Citizenship: A Collaborative Ethnography. European Journal of Cultural Studies 10 (3): 275–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, Andrew. 2007. Preparation for Terrorism: Catastrophic Risk and Precautionary Criminal Law. In Law and Liberty and the War on Terror, ed. Andrew Lynch, Edwina MacDonald, and George Williams, 59–74. Annandale: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, Robert E. 2006. What’s Wrong with Terrorism. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Pat. 1998. Policy Disasters in Europe: An Introduction. In Public Policy Disasters in Europe, ed. Paul ‘t Hart and Pat Gray, 3–20. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiora, Amos, Genevieve Lennon, and Clive Walker. 2015. Homeland Security. In Routledge Handbook of Law and Terrorism, ed. Genevieve Lennon and Clive Walker, 315–333. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, Paddy. 1993. Suspect Community: People’s Experiences of the Prevention of Terrorism Acts in Britain. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holehouse, Matthew. 2014. Strip British Jihadists of Citizenship, Demand Public. Daily Telegraph. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/11067321/Strip-British-jihadists-of-citizenship-demand-public.html. 9 Mai 2017.

  • House of Commons. 2005. Home Affairs Committee: Terrorism and Community Relations. Available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmhaff/165/165.pdf. 11 Aug 2016.

  • Independent Police Complaints Commission. 2007. Stockwell One: Investigation into the Shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes at Stockwell Underground Station on 22 July 2005. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100908152737/http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/stockwell_one.pdf. 4 Jan 2017.

  • Jarvis, Lee, and Michael Lister. 2015a. Anti-Terrorism, Citizenship and Security in the UK. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. “I Read It in the FT”: ‘Everyday’ Knowledge of Counter-Terrorism and Its Articulation. In Critical Perspectives on Counter-Terrorism, ed. Lee Jarvis and Michael Lister, 109–129. Routledge: Abingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legrand, Tim, Simon Bronitt, and Mark Stewart. 2015. Evidence of the Impact of Counter-Terrorism Legislation. In Routledge Handbook of Law and Terrorism, ed. Genevieve Lennon and Clive Walker, 297–312. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lint, Willem, and Wondwossen Kassa. 2015. Evaluating U.S. Counterterrorism Policy: Failure, Fraud, or Fruitful Spectacle? Critical Criminology 23 (3): 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lum, Cynthia, Leslie W. Kennedy, and Alison J. Sherley. 2006. The Effectiveness of Counter-Terrorism Strategies. Campbell Systematic Reviews 2: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, Allan. 2013. Policy Success, Policy Failure and Grey Areas In-Between. Journal of Public Policy 30 (3): 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. 2009. Statistics on Race and the Criminal Justice System 2007/8. Available at http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/statistics.htm. 22 May 2017.

  • Mueller, John, and Mark Stewart. 2011. Terror, Security, and Money: Balancing the Risks, Benefits, and Costs of Homeland Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pantazis, Christina, and Simon Pemberton. 2009. From the ‘Old’ to the ‘New’ Suspect Community Examining the Impacts of Recent UK Counter-Terrorist Legislation. British Journal of Criminology 49 (5): 646–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Reconfiguring Security and Liberty: Political Discourses and Public Opinion in the New Century. British Journal of Criminology 52 (3): 651–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl. 2002 [1963]. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, Peter S. 2005. Measuring Success in Countering Terrorism: Problems and Pitfalls. In Intelligence and Security Informatics. ISI 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. Paul Kantor et al., 316–321. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragazzi, Francesco. 2016. Suspect Community or Suspect Category? The Impact of Counter-Terrorism as “Policed Multiculturalism”. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (5): 724–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rygiel, Kim. 2008. The Securitized Citizen. In Recasting the Social in Citizenship, ed. Engin F. Isin, 210–238. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sageman, Marc. 2014. The Stagnation in Terrorism Research. Terrorism and Political Violence 26 (4): 565–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, T. 2004. The Impact of Anti Terrorism Powers on the British Muslim Population. Liberty. Accessible at: http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/policy/reports/impact-of-anti-terror-measures-on-british-muslims-june-2004.pdf. Accessed 21 Apr 2017.

  • Spencer, Alexander. 2006. The Problems of Evaluating Counter-Terrorism. UNISCI Discussion Papers 12: 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, Cass R. 2003. Terrorism and Probability Neglect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 26 (2–3): 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Times. 2007. Poker-face Jacqui Unfazed by the Wrong Facts. The Times, December 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Um, Eric, and Daniela Pisoiu. 2015. Dealing with Uncertainty: The Illusion of Knowledge in the Study of Counterterrorism Effectiveness. Critical Studies on Terrorism 8 (2): 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Legrand, T., Lister, M. (2018). From Precaution to Prejudice: Mistakes in Counter-terrorism. In: Kruck, A., Oppermann, K., Spencer, A. (eds) Political Mistakes and Policy Failures in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68173-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics