Skip to main content

Introduction: Mistakes and Failures in International Relations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This introduction firstly considers the concepts of ‘mistakes’ and ‘failures’ and reflects on ontological and epistemological perspectives on how to study mistakes and failures. We secondly turn to the question of what causes mistakes and failures and introduce a range of theories for explaining and understanding mistakes and failures. Part three examines the notion of responsibility attribution and considers why and how actors get blame d for mistakes and failures. In these three parts, we both summarize the state of the art and point out how the chapters in this volume add new insights and perspectives. Part four offers an overview of the chapters which are to follow and part five elaborates on the lessons learnt from these insights on mistakes and failures in international relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allison, Graham T. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, Graham T., and Philip Zelikow. 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Christopher J. 2000. Economic Voting and Political Context: A Comparative Perspective. Electoral Studies 19: 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronczyk, Melissa. 2008. “Living the Brand”. Nationality, Globality and the Identity Strategies of Nation Branding Consultants. International Journal of Communication 2: 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badie, Dina. 2010. Groupthink, Iraq, and the War on Terror: Explaining US Policy Shift Toward Iraq. Foreign Policy Analysis 6 (4): 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boin, Arjen, Paul ‘t Hart, and Allan McConnell. 2009. Crisis Exploitation: Political and Policy Impacts of Framing Contests. Journal of European Public Policy 16 (1): 81–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, Mark, and Paul ‘t Hart. 1996. Understanding Policy Fiascoes. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Revisiting the Study of Policy Failures. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (5): 653–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, Mark, Paul ‘t Hart, and B. Guy Peters. 1998. Explaining Policy Disasters in Europe. Comparisons and Reflections. In Public Policy Disasters in Western Europe, ed. Pat Gray and Paul ‘t Hart, 195–214. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. The State of Public Governance. In Success and Failure in Public Governance, ed. Mark Bovens, Paul ‘t Hart, and B. Guy Peters, 3–11. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brändström, Annika, and Sanneke Kuipers. 2003. From ‘Normal Incidents’ to Political Crises: Understanding the Selective Politicization of Policy Failures. Government and Opposition 38 (3): 279–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, Richard M., and James G. March. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, Patrick. 1995. Policy Disasters: Explaining the UK’s Record. Public Policy and Administration 10 (2): 52–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, Colin. 1996. Horses for Courses: Why Not Neorealist Theories of Foreign Policy? Security Studies 6 (1): 7–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gailey, Jeannine A. 2013. Attribution of Responsibility for Organizational Wrongdoing: A Partial Test of an Integrated Model. Journal of Criminology 4: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gailey, Jeannine A., and Matthew T. Lee. 2005. An Integrated Model of Attribution of Responsibility for Wrongdoing in Organizations. Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (4): 338–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, Walter B. 1955. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawronsky, Bertram. 2007. Fundamental Attribution Error. In Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, ed. Roy F. Baumeister and Kathleen D. Vohs, 368–369. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhards, Jürgen, Jochen Roose, and Anke Offerhaus. 2013. Die Rekonfiguration von politischer Verantwortungszuschreibung im Rahmen staatlichen Wandels. In Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik: Umkämpfte internationale Institutionen, ed. Michael Zürn and Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt, 109–133. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Pat. 1996. Disastrous Explanations – Or Explanations of Disaster? A Reply to Patrick Dunleavy. Public Policy and Administration 11 (1): 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Policy Disasters in Europe. An Introduction. In Public Policy Disasters in Western Europe, ed. Pat Gray and Paul ‘t Hart, 3–20. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, V. Lee. 1986. Chains of Command. Responsibility Attribution in Hierarchies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 16 (2): 118–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnisch, Sebastian. 2012. Conceptualizing in the Minefield: Role Theory and Foreign Policy Learning. Foreign Policy Analysis 8 (1): 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, Richard K., and Michael P. Fischerkeller. 1995. Beyond the Enemy Image and Spiral Model: Cognitive-Strategic Research After the Cold War. International Organization 49 (3): 415–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Christopher. 2003. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, Sarah B., and James Tilley. 2014. Blaming Europe? Responsibility Without Accountability in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, Sarah B., James Tilley, and Susan Banducci. 2013. Clarity of Responsibility: How Government Cohesion Conditions Performance Voting. European Journal of Political Research 52 (2): 164–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, Christopher. 2002. The Risk Game and the Blame Game. Government and Opposition 37 (1): 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, Michael. 2012. The Lessons of Failure: Learning and Blame Avoidance in Public Policy-Making. International Political Science Review 33 (5): 539–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsse, Rainer. 2009. The Catwalk Power: Germany’s New Foreign Image Policy. Journal of International Relations and Development 12 (3): 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iida, Keisuke. 1996. Involuntary Defection in Two-Level Games. Public Choice 89 (3/4): 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, Helen M., and Dean E. Mann. 1980. Policy Failure: An Issue Deserving Analysis. In Why Policies Succeed or Fail, ed. Helen M. Ingram and Dean E. Mann, 11–33. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, Irving. 1982. Groupthink. Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Crucial Decisions. Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, Robert. 1968. Hypotheses on Misperception. World Politics 20 (3): 454–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. Cognition and Political Behavior. In Political Cognition, ed. Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears, 319–336. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. War and Misperception. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18 (4): 675–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Leadership, Post-Cold War Politics, and Psychology. Political Psychology 15 (4): 769–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khong, Yuen Foong. 1992. Analogies at War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Anthony, and Ivor Crewe. 2013. The Blunders of Our Governments. London: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, Ronald R. 2015a. Narrative and the Making of US National Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. How Dominant Narratives Rise and Fall: Military Conflict, Politics, and the Cold War Consensus. International Organization 69 (4): 809–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruck, Andreas. 2016. Resilient Blunderers: Credit Rating Fiascos and Rating Agencies’ Institutionalized Status as Private Authorities. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (5): 753–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Jack S. 1986. Organizational Routines and the Causes of War. International Studies Quarterly 30 (2): 193–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Learning and Foreign Policy. Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. International Organization 48 (2): 279–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, Neil, and Alexander G. Kuo. 2008. Attributing Blame: The Public’s Response to Hurricane Katrina. The Journal of Politics 70 (1): 120–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, David, and Allan McConnell. 2010. Towards a Framework for Establishing Policy Success. Public Administration 88 (2): 564–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Michael, and James Tilley. 2010. The Attribution of Credit and Blame to Governments and Its Impact on Vote Choice. British Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, Peter J. 1992. Policy Learning and Failure. Journal of Public Policy 12 (4): 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, Allan. 2010. Policy Success, Policy Failure and Grey Areas In-Between. Journal of Public Policy 30 (3): 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. A Public Policy Approach to Understanding the Nature and Causes of Foreign Policy Failure. Journal European Public Policy 23 (5): 667–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, Rose. 2017. Emotions in Foreign Policy Decision Making. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.418.

  • Mearsheimer, John J. 2007. Structural Realism. In International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity, ed. Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, 71–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppermann, Kai, and Alexander Spencer. 2013. Thinking Alike? Salience and Metaphor analysis as Cognitive Approaches to Foreign Policy Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis 9 (1): 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Telling Stories of Failure: Narrative Constructions of Foreign Policy Fiascos. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (5): 685–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. Bingham, Jr., and Guy D. Whitten. 1993. A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 391–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 43 (3): 427–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, Berthold, Helena Schwarzenbeck, and Bernhard Zangl. 2017. Where Does the Buck Stop? Explaining Public Responsibility Attributions in Complex International Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (4): 909–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, Thomas J. 2003. Institutional Context and the Assignment of Political Responsibility. Journal of Politics 65 (1): 190–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagan, Scott D. 1985. Nuclear Alerts and Crisis Management. International Security 9 (4): 99–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of Man: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Steve. 1984. Policy Preferences and Bureaucratic Position: The Case of the American Hostage Rescue Mission. International Affairs 61 (1): 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. Groupthink and the Hostage Rescue Mission. British Journal of Political Science 15 (1): 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Martin A. 2008. US Bureaucratic Politics and the Decision to Invade Iraq. Contemporary Politics 14 (1): 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbruner, John D. 1974. The Cybernetic Theory of Decision. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘t Hart, Paul. 1993. Symbols, Rituals and Power: The Lost Dimensions of Crisis Management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 1 (1): 36–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, James, and Sara B. Hobolt. 2011. Is the Government to Blame? An Experimental Test of How Partisanship Shapes Perceptions of Performance and Responsibility. The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 316–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, Barbara W. 1984. The March of Folly. From Troy to Vietnam. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty. Heuristics and Biases. In Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, ed. Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky, 3–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ham, Peter. 2002. Branding Territory: Inside the Wonderful Worlds of PR and IR Theory. Millennium 31 (2): 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. Kent. 1986. The Politics of Blame Avoidance. Journal of Public Policy 6 (4): 371–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlstetter, Roberta. 1962. Pearl Harbor: Warning and Decision. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yetiv, Steve A. 2003. Groupthink and the Gulf Crisis. British Journal of Political Science 33 (3): 419–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziv, Guy. 2013. Simple vs. Complex Learning Revisited: Israeli Prime Ministers and the Question of a Palestinian State. Foreign Policy Analysis 9 (2): 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kruck, A., Oppermann, K., Spencer, A. (2018). Introduction: Mistakes and Failures in International Relations. In: Kruck, A., Oppermann, K., Spencer, A. (eds) Political Mistakes and Policy Failures in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68173-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics