Skip to main content

Do Online Reviews of Physicians Reflect Healthcare Outcomes?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Health (ICSH 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10347))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Patients are increasingly using online reviews to choose physicians. However, it is not known whether online reviews accurately capture the true quality of care provided by physicians. This research addresses this issue by empirically examining the link between online reviews of a physician and the actual clinical outcomes of patients treated by the physician. Specifically, this study uses online reviews from Vitals.com, and combines that data with patient health outcomes data collected from Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council. Our econometric analyses show that there is no clear relationship between online reviews of physicians and their patients’ health outcomes, such as readmission and ER visit rates. Our results imply that online reviews may not be as helpful in the context of healthcare as they are for other experience goods such as books, movies, or hotels. Our findings have important implications for healthcare providers, healthcare review websites, and healthcare consumers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/05/27/docs-fire-back-at-bad-yelp-reviews-and-reveal-patients-information-online, last accessed 03/31/2017.

  2. 2.

    http://www.oregonlive.com/today/index.ssf/2015/11/doctor_sues_patient_over_negat.html and http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/01/another-failed-doctor-lawsuit-against-a-patient-for-online-reviews-brandner-v-molonguet.htm, last accessed on 03/31/2017.

  3. 3.

    Source: http://health.usnews.com/health-news/patient-advice/articles/2014/12/19/are-online-physician-ratings-any-good%20, last accessed on 03/31/2017.

  4. 4.

    \( \begin{aligned} SentScorePerReview & \, = \, 2 \times number\,of\,very\,positive\,words\,\, + \,\,1 \times number\,of\,positive\,words\, \\ & \quad {-} 1 \times number\,of negative\,words \,{-} \,2 \times number of\,very\,negative\,words. \\ \end{aligned} \)

  5. 5.

    If SentScorePerReview is greater than zero, we label the review “positive;” if it is less than zero, we label it “negative,” and “neutral” if it is zero.

References

  • Bardach, N.S., Asteria-Penaloza, R., Boscardin, W.J., Dudley, R.A.: The relationship between commercial website ratings and traditional hospital performance measures in the USA. BMJ Qual. Saf. 22(3), 194–202 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet Allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, W., Glickman, S.W., Manary, M., Schulman, K.A., Staelin, R.: Relationship between patient satisfaction with inpatient care and hospital readmission within 30 days. Am. J. Managed Care 17(1), 41–48 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J.A., Mayzlin, D.: The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. J. Mark. Res. 43(3), 345–354 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, C., Lennox, L., Bell, D.: A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient satisfaction and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open 3(1), 1–18 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, G.G., Greenwood, B.N., Agarwal, R., McCullough, J.S.: Vocal minority and silent majority: how do online ratings reflect population perceptions of quality? MIS Q. 39(3), 565–589 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, S.W., Boulding, W., Manary, M., Staelin, R., Roe, M.T., Wolosin, R.J., Ohman, E.M., Peterson, E.D., Schulman, K.A.: Patient satisfaction and its relationship with clinical quality and inpatient mortality in acute myocardial infarction. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 3(2), 188–195 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B., Vandergrift, J.L., Gao, G.G., McCullough, J.S., Lipner, R.S.: Website ratings of physicians and their true quality of care. JAMA Internal Med. 175(2), 291–293 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanauer, D.A., Zheng, K., Singer, D.C., Gebremariam, A., Davis, M.M.: Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 311(7), 734–735 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, F.Å.: A new ANEW: evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs. In: Proceedings of the ESWC2011 Workshop on ‘Making Sense of Microposts’: Big Things Come in Small Package, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, no. 718, pp. 93–98 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, I.E., Seegers, D.: Tried and tested: the impact of online hotel reviews on online hotel reviews on consumer consideration. Tour. Manag. 30(1), 123–127 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saifee, D.H., Bardhan, I., Zheng, Z.(. (2017). Do Online Reviews of Physicians Reflect Healthcare Outcomes?. In: Chen, H., Zeng, D., Karahanna, E., Bardhan, I. (eds) Smart Health. ICSH 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10347. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67964-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67964-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67963-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67964-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics