Skip to main content

Interdependence of Macroeconomic Indicators and Inequality in Kazakhstan and its Main Trading Partners

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Eurasian Economic Perspectives

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 8/2))

  • 615 Accesses

Abstract

For the current stage of development of the world economy, a high degree of interdependence of macroeconomic indicators across countries is characterized. Business cycles pulse transmission can occur through many channels. They can occur as a result of observed shocks of global factors, such as the world price of oil, food products, and unobservable factors, such as the spread of new technologies. In the report the aim is to reveal the relationship of macroeconomic indicators of Kazakhstan and its main trading partners on the basis of a global vector autoregression model. The model includes 12 countries: Kazakhstan, China, Russia, Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain and the United States. For its construction quarterly data for 1995–2013 years were used. Shocks of variables such as real GDP, inflation, short-term and long-term nominal interest rates, real exchange rate, Gini index, and responses to them in all countries are considered. Also, world oil price shocks has a strong influence. The constructed model makes it possible to assess the impact of the various shocks that arise in partner countries on macroeconomic performance in a small economy, including socio-economic indicators, such as income inequality. In particular, it became clear that a positive shock in real GDP in each country reduces inequality in the country and in other countries. Positive shocks to Russia Gini Index has also increased income inequality in Kazakhstan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Auguste, D. (2012). European integration and income inequality convergence (Working Paper) [online]. Accessed September 13, 2016, from http://paa2013.princeton.edu/papers/132193

  • Beckfield, J. (2006). European integration and income inequality. American Sociological Review, 71, 964–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall, N. (2001). Why inequality matters: Some economics issues. Ethics and International Affairs, 15(2), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brixiova, Z., & Treigiene, D. (2003). Globalization and growth in recent research [online]. Accessed March 02, 2017, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.196.5504&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Cornia, G. A., & Kiiski, S. (2001). Trends in income distribution in the post WWII period: Evidence and interpretation (WIDER Discussion Paper. No. 2003/28).

    Google Scholar 

  • Czerewacz-Filipowicz, K. (2016). Economic and geoeconomic effects of the Eurasian Economic Union: Trade aspects. In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, & U. Can (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Eurasia Business and Economics Society conference – Country experiences in economic development, management and entrepreneurship (pp. 331–339). Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2015). Spreading the wealth [online]. Accessed February 02, 2016, from http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2002-01-01/spreading-wealth

  • Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goklani, I. M. (2015). Globalization of human wellbeing [online]. Accessed July 09, 2016, from http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2007/0273/analit09.php

  • Heshmati, А. (2003). Measurement of a multidimensional index of globalization and its impact on income inequality (WIDER Discussion Paper. No. 2003/69).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heshmati, A. (2005). The relationship between income inequality, poverty, and globalization (Research Paper No. 2005/37) [online]. Accessed March 02, 2017, from https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/rp2005-37.pdf

  • Johansen, S. (1992). Determination of cointegration rank in the presence of a linear trend. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54(3), 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jomo, J. S. (2015). Growth with equity in East Asia? (DESA Working Paper No. 33).

    Google Scholar 

  • Killick, T. (2001). Globalisation and the rural poor. Development Policy Review, 19(2), 155–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, F., & Smith, V. (2013). The basic DdPS model. In F. Mauro & H. Pesaran (Eds.), The GVAR handbook: Structure and applications of a macro model in the global economy for policy analysis (pp. 12–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P. (1998). Social policy and European integration in centralization or fragmentation. In A. Moravcsik (Ed.), Europe facing the challenges of deepening, diversity, and democracy (pp. 124–158). New York, NY: Council on Foreign Relations Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H., Schuermann, T., & Weiner, S. M. (2004). Modeling regional interdependencies using a global errorcorrecting macroeconometric model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 22, 129–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. V., & Galesi, A. (2014). GVAR Toolbox 2.0 [online]. Accessed October 15, 2016, from https://sites.google.com/gvarmodelling/gvar-toolbox

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2005). Human development report [online]. New York. Accessed June 22, 2016, from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/266/hdr05_complete.pdf

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2014). Human development report [online]. New York. Accessed June 12, 2016, from http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2014_complete.pdf

  • Wood, A. (1994). North-South trade, employment and inequality: Changing fortunes in a skill-driven economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is a part of the project no. 1077/GF financed by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bulat Mukhamediyev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mukhamediyev, B., Kudasheva, T., Khitakhunov, A. (2018). Interdependence of Macroeconomic Indicators and Inequality in Kazakhstan and its Main Trading Partners. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 8/2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67916-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics