Skip to main content

Building a Conceptual Model for Brand Meanings in Wearable Sports Technology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 8/1))

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to build a conceptual model for understanding brand meanings in wearable sports technology. Wearable sports technology is a complex concept, because it integrates characteristics of clothing related issues like aesthetics and comfort as well as properties of electronic devices such as usability. Due to the lack of previous literature within the field of wearable sports technology three domains of literature are combined in the conceptual model to gain deeper understanding of the phenomenon. These three domains include the field of sports brands, technology and fashion. The connection between the two central theoretical constructs of brand meanings and brand relationships is elaborated in the proposed conceptual model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahuvia, A. C. (2005). Beyond the extended self: Loved objects and consumers’ identity narratives. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auty, S., & Elliott, R. (1998). Fashion involvement, self-monitoring and the meaning of brands. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 7(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batey, M. (2008). Brand meaning. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchet, P., Hillariet, D., & Bodet, G. (2013). Sport brands. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brakus, J., Schmitt, B., & Zarantonello, L. (2009). Brand experience: What is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chard, C. (2013). Understanding the brand meaning of the Canadian interuniversity sport hockey league: An insurance policy if all else fails! Sport in Society, 16(3), 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, P. (2005). Let them eat cake: Marketing luxury to the masses—As well as the classes. Chicago: Dearborn Trade, A Kaplan Professional Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. (2007). Brand meaning and children: A thematic categorisation task. Journal of Brand Management, 14(3), 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, B., & Solomon, M. (1995). To be and not to be: Lifestyle imagenary, reference groups, and the clustering of America. Journal of Advertising, 24(1), 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-construal, reference groups and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(6), 378–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • First, I. (2009). Brand meaning and its creation in a cross-cultural context. In Academic dissertation. St. Gallen: Publications of University of St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (2015). Lessons learned about consumers’ relationships with their brands. In D. McInnis, C. Whan Park, & J. Priester (Eds.), Handbook of brand relationships (pp. 5–23). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S., Breazeale, M., & Avery, J. (2015). Strong brands, strong relationships. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaimster, J. (2012). The changing landscape of fashion forecasting. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 5(3), 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Y., Li, H., & Luo, Y. (2015). An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 115(9), 1704–1723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, D., Williams, R., & Omar, M. (2007). Branding strategy and consumer high technology product. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 16(2), 98–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, Y., Nunes, J., & Dréze, X. (2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemetsberger, A., Kittinger-Rosanelli, S., & Friedmann, S. (2009). “Bye bye love”—Why devoted consumers break up with their brands. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 430–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, P., Cote, J. A., Leong, S. M., & Schmitt, B. (2003). Building strong brands in Asia: Selecting the visual components of image to maximize brand strength. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(4), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, E., & Holbrook, M. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J., & Kandampully, J. (2012). The role of emotional aspects in younger consumer-brand relationships. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 21(2), 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, J.-N. (2012). The new strategic brand management: Advanced insights and strategic thinking. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., Shin, D., & Park, E. (2015). Can coolness predict technology adoption? Effects of perceived coolness on user acceptance of smartphones with curved screens. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 8(9), 528–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligas, M., & Cotte, J. (1999). The process of negotiating brand meaning. Advances in Consumer Research, 26(1), 609–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malar, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Nyffenegger, B. (2011). Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, J. (2009). End-user based design of innovative smart clothing. In J. McCann & D. Bryson (Eds.), Smart clothes and wearable technology (pp. 4–24). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McInnis, D., Whan Park, C., & Priester, J. (2014). Handbook of brand relationships. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan-Thomas, A., & Veloutsou, C. (2013). Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muniz, A. (1997). Consumers and brand meaning: Brands, the self and others. Advances in Consumer Research, 24(1), 308–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakenfull, G., Blair, E., Gelb, B., & Dacin, P. (2000). Measuring brand meaning. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(5), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, L. (2012). Marketing semiotics: Signs, strategies and brand value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pichler, E., & Hemetsberger, A. (2008). Driven by devotion—How consumers interact with their objects of devotion. Advances in Consumer Research, 35, 439–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, M., & Aron, A. (2015). Self-expansion motivation and inclusion of brands in self: Toward a theory of brand relationships. In D. McInnis, C. Whan Park, & J. Priester (Eds.), Handbook of brand relationships (pp. 65–81). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenberger, V., & Hyde, K. (2013). The role of sports brands in niche sports subcultures. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 15(1), 40–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M., Russell-Bennett, R., & Previte, J. (2012). Consumer behaviour. Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, M., MacInnis, D., & Whan Park, C. (2005). The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannoy, S. A., & Palvia, P. (2010). The social influence model of technology adoption. Communications of the ACM, 53(6), 149–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and user of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watchravesringkan, K., Hodges, N. N., & Kim, Y. H. (2010). Exploring consumers’ adoption of highly technological fashion products: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivational factors. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 14(2), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann, K. P., Hennigs, N., & Siebels, A. (2007). Measuring consumers’ luxury value perception: A cross-cultural framework. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 7(3), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pekka Tuominen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Karamaki, H., Lahtinen, S., Tuominen, P. (2018). Building a Conceptual Model for Brand Meanings in Wearable Sports Technology. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Eurasian Business Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 8/1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67913-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics