Advertisement

Public Confidence in Criminal Justice: What’s the Problem?

  • Elizabeth R. Turner
Chapter
  • 273 Downloads
Part of the Critical Criminological Perspectives book series (CCRP)

Abstract

Turner sets the idea of public confidence in criminal justice in the context of concerns about ‘penal populism’. She notes that criminologists have proposed a number of responses to populism, including protecting criminal justice from political influence, better educating the public to produce more informed opinion, and shifting towards a ‘better politics’ through dialogue and deliberation. Turner suggests that deliberative methods show the most promise when it comes to making sustainable improvements in the politics of criminal justice policy. However, she argues, the dominance of quantitative, survey-based approaches to understanding ‘public opinion’, including ‘public confidence’, poses a substantial barrier to adopting a more deliberative approach. In light of this, she proposes, it is necessary to examine how the survey-based approach became dominant in order to challenge it more effectively.

Keywords

Penal populism Democracy Public opinion Deliberative methods Public confidence in criminal justice 

References

  1. Bell, Emma. 2014. There Is an Alternative: Challenging the Logic of Neoliberal Penality. Theoretical Criminology 18 (4): 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bosworth, Mary. 2011. Penal Moderation in the United States? Yes We Can. Criminology & Public Policy 10 (2): 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bottoms, Anthony. 1995. The Philosophy and Politics of Punishment and Sentencing. In The Politics of Sentencing Reform, ed. Chris Clarkson and Rod Morgan, 17–49. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  4. Chapman, Becca, Catriona Mirrlees-Black, and Claire Brawn. 2002. Improving Public Attitudes to the Criminal Justice System: The Impact of Information. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  5. Doob, Anthony N., and Julian V. Roberts. 1984. Social Psychology, Social Attitudes, and Attitudes Towards Sentencing. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 16 (4): 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 1988. Public Punitiveness and Public Knowledge of the Facts: Some Canadian Surveys. In Public Attitudes to Sentencing: Surveys from Five Countries, ed. N. Walker and M. Hough, 111–133. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  7. Durkheim, Emile. 1938. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dzur, A. 2012. Punishment, Participatory Democracy and the Jury. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Girling, Evi, Ian Loader, and Richard Sparks. 2000. Crime and Social Change in Middle England. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Green, David A. 2008. When Children Kill Children: Penal Populism and Political Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hough, Mike, and Julian V. Roberts. 1998. Attitudes to Punishment: Findings from the British Crime Survey. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  12. Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, Murray. 2007. Inventing Fear of Crime: Criminology and the Politics of Anxiety. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  14. Loader, Ian. 2008. The Anti-politics of Crime. Theoretical Criminology 12 (3): 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2011. Playing with Fire? Democracy and the Emotions of Crime and Punishment. In Emotions, Crime and Justice, ed. Susanne Karstedt, Ian Loader, and Heather Strang, 347–362. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  16. Loader, Ian, and Richard Sparks. 2011. Public Criminology? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2012. Beyond Lamentation: Towards a Democratic Egalitarian Politics of Crime and Justice. In Policing: Politics, Culture and Control, ed. T. Newburn and J. Peay, 11–42. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Luskin, Robert C., James S. Fishkin, and Roger Jowell. 2002. Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain. British Journal of Political Science 32: 455–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pratt, J. 2007. Penal Populism. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Roberts, Julian V., Loretta J. Stalans, David Indermaur, and Mike Hough. 2003. Penal Populism and Public Opinion: Lessons from Five Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Salisbury, Heather. 2004. Public Attitudes to the Criminal Justice System: The Impact of Providing Information to British Crime Survey Respondents. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  22. Singer, Lawrence, and Suzanne Cooper. 2008. Inform, Persuade and Remind: An Evaluation of a Project to Improve Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice System. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth R. Turner
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations