Advertisement

Adaptivity with B-spline Elements

  • Malcolm SabinEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10521)

Abstract

This paper takes a stage further the work of Kraft [1] and of Grinspun et al. [2] who used subdivision formulations to show that finite element formulation can be expressed better in terms of the basis functions used to span the space, rather than in terms of the partitioning of the domain into elements. Adaptivity is achieved not by subpartitioning the domain, but by nesting of solution spaces. This paper shows how, with B-spline elements, their approach can be further simplified: a B-spline element of any degree and in any number of dimensions can be refined independently of every other within the basis. This completely avoids the linear dependence problem, and can also give slightly more focussed adaptivity, adding extra freedom only, and exactly, where it is needed, thus reducing the solution times.

Keywords

Finite elements Adaptivity Nested spaces 

References

  1. 1.
    Kraft, R.: Adaptive and linearly independent multilevel B-splines. In: Le Méhauté, A., Rabut, C., Schumaker, L. (eds.) Surface Fitting and Multiresolution Methods, pp. 209–218. Vanderbilt University Press (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grinspun, E., Krysl, P., Schröder, P.: A simple framework for adaptive simulation. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2002 (ACM Transactions on Graphics), pp. 281–290 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giannelli, C., Jüttler, B., Speleers, H.: THB-splines: the truncated basis for hierarchical splines. CAGD 29(7), 485–496 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dokken, T., Lyche, T., Pettersen, K.F.: Polynomial splines over locally refined box-partitions. CAGD 30(3), 331–356 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kosinka, J., Sabin, M.A., Dodgson, N.A.: Control vectors for splines. CAD 58, 173–178 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johannessen, K.A., Remonato, F., Kvamsdal, T.: On the similarities and differences between classical hierarchical, truncated hierarchical and LR B-splines. CMAME 291, 64–101 (2015)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Numerical Geometry Ltd.Ely, CambsUK

Personalised recommendations