Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Legitimizing Corporate Harm

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology ((PSGC))

  • 326 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the topic of the discursive construction of corporate harm and orients the work theoretically. The chapter also outlines the focus of the book, which is to answer the question of how agribusinesses culturally legitimize their harmful practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Beirne (1999) notes that although the use of the term “nonhuman animal” serves the purpose of connoting that humans are also animals, the term is not without problems. Beirne likens the use of the term “nonhuman animals” to the use of the term “non-male human,” where one person is defined negatively in terms of their relation to another. Nonetheless, the terms “animals” and “nonhuman animals” will be used interchangeably throughout the book.

  2. 2.

    Please note that the separation between environment , humans, and animals is merely practical. I recognize that a broad definition of environment necessarily includes people and animals. Later in the book, I discuss specific harms and these categorizations (environment, humans, and animals) facilitate that discussion.

  3. 3.

    I will use pronouns such as “they,” “them,” and “their” to refer to Tyson and other corporations throughout the book. Although these pronouns personify the corporation, referring to the corporations as “it” poses a greater issue as it discursively constructs the company as a nonagent (see Korten 1995).

  4. 4.

    Note that the phrases “livestock producers” and “chicken producers” will be used throughout the book, although I find these terms inherently problematic as they imply that the animals require human intervention to exist. The terms “pork producers” and “beef producers” cause slightly less concern because the terms “pork” and “beef” refer not to the animals themselves, but to the meat that comes from these animals. These are examples of metonymy , explained in Appendix.

  5. 5.

    ChartsBin is an online tool for creating charts and graphs. The ChartsBin website provides interactive charts and maps for several public data sets.

  6. 6.

    The term “factory farm” is often used by animal activists to describe intensive animal farming as it connotes the poor conditions animals experience within industrial agriculture. The term is considered offensive, inaccurate, and nontechnical by those in the industry (see McCarty 2005).

  7. 7.

    Note that Halsey later distanced himself from his 2004 work, stating that he is “less wedded” to the idea that “the term ‘green’ should be jettisoned from criminological discourse ” (Halsey 2013: 107).

References

  • Agnew, Robert. 1998. The Causes of Animal Abuse: A Social-Psychological Analysis. Theoretical Criminology 2: 177–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, Miguel A. 2000. Ecological Impacts of Industrial Agriculture and the Possibilities for Truly Sustainable Farming. In Hungry for Profit: The Agribusiness Threat to Farmers, Food, and the Environment, ed. F. Magdoff, J.B. Foster, and F.H. Buttel. New York: Monthly Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkow, Phil. 1997. Relationships Between Animal Abuse and Other Forms of Family Violence. Protecting Children 13: 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascione, Frank R. 1997. Battered Women’s Report of Their Partner’s and Their Children’s Cruelty to Animals. Journal of Emotional Abuse 1: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASPCA. 2013. What Is a Factory Farm? New York: American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. http://www.aspca.org/Fight-AnimalCruelty/farm-animal-cruelty/what-is-afactory-farm. Accessed 18 Aug 2013.

  • Beirne, Piers. 1999. For a Non-Speciesist Criminology: Animal Abuse as an Object of Study. Criminology 37: 117–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, Piers, and Nigel South. 2007. Introduction: Approaching Green Criminology. In Issues in Green Criminology, ed. Piers Beirne and Nigel South, xiii–xxii. Portland: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff, Marc. 2010. The Animal Manifesto: Six Reasons for Expanding Our Compassion Footprint. Novato: New World Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, Steven. 1983. Power, Crime, and Mystification. London: Tavistock.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brisman, Avi, and Nigel South. 2013. A Green-Cultural Criminology: An Exploratory Outline. Crime Media Culture 9: 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Green Cultural Criminology: Constructions of Environmental Harm, Consumerism, and Resistance to Ecocide. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChartsBin. 2013. Current Worldwide Annual Meat Consumption Per Capita. http://chartsbin.com/view/bhy. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.

  • Cohn, Carol. 1987. Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12: 687–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curra, John. 2014. The Relativity of Deviance. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Marian S. 2008. The Science of Animal Suffering. Ethology 114: 937–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGue, Sarah, and David DiLillo. 2009. Is Animal Cruelty a ‘Red Flag’ for Family Violence? Investigating Co-Occurring Violence Toward Children, Partners, and Pets. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2: 1036–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deviney, Elizabeth, Jeffrey Dickert, and Randall Lockwood. 1983. The Care of Pets Within Child Abusing Families. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems 4: 321–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA. 2012. Regulatory Definitions of Large CAFOs, Medium CAFOs, and Small CAFOs. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/sector_table.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.

  • Farm Forward. 2014. Ending Factory Farming. https://farmforward.com/ending-factory-farming/. Accessed 20 July 2016.

  • Federal Water Pollution Control Act. 1972. 33 U.S.C. 1251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felthous, Alan R. 1980. Aggression Against Cats, Dogs, and People. Child Psychiatry and Human Development 10: 169–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felthous, Alan, and Harold Bernard. 1979. Enuresis, Fire Setting and Cruelty to Animals: The Significance of Two Thirds of This Triad. Forensic Science 2: 240–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felthous, Alan R., and Stephen R. Kellert. 1987. Childhood Cruelty to Animals and Later Aggression Against People: A Review. American Journal of Psychiatry 14: 710–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, Clifton P. 2011. Examining the Links Between Animal Abuse and Human Violence. Crime, Law and Social Change 55 (5): 453–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazdziak, Sam. 2013. The National Provisioner’s Top 100. The National Provisioner. http://www.provisioneronline.com/ext/resources/2013May/024-037-top-100.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2013.

  • Goyes, David Rodriguez, and Nigel South. 2017. Green Criminology Before ‘Green Criminology’: Amnesia and Absences. Critical Criminology 25: 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, Mark. 2004. Against ‘Green’ Criminology. British Journal of Criminology 44: 833–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Conservation Criminology and the “General Accident” of Climate Change. In Routledge International Handbook of Green Criminology, ed. N. South and A. Brisman, 107–119. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Ruth. 1966. Animal Machines: An Expose of “Factory Farming” and Its Danger to the Public. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, Daniel S., and Nathan Blackman. 1966. Enuresis, Fire Setting and Cruelty to Animals: A Triad Predictive of Adult Crime. American Journal of Psychiatry 122: 1431–1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Stuart, and Dragan Milovanovic. 1996. Constitutive Criminology: Beyond Postmodernism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, Paddy, Christina Pantazis, Steve Tombs, and Dave Gordon, eds. 2004. Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan, Leo, Robert S. Lawrence, and Polly Walker. 2002. How Sustainable Agriculture Can Address the Environmental and Human Health Harms of Industrial Agriculture. Environmental Health Perspectives 110 (5): 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hribar, Carrie, and Mark Schultz. 2010. Understanding Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations and Their Impact on Communities. Bowling Green: National Association of Local Boards of Health. http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/ehs/docs/understanding_cafos_nalboh.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2014.

  • Kalof, Linda, and Carl Taylor. 2007. The Discourse of Dog-Fighting. Humanity and Society 31: 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korten, David C. 1995. When Corporations Rule the World. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael J. 1990. The Greening of Criminology: A Perspective for the 1990s. The Critical Criminologist 2: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael J., and Paul B. Stretesky. 2003. The Meaning of Green: Contrasting Criminological Perspectives. Theoretical Criminology 7: 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, Rick. 2005. Consumers Aware of Factory Farming; Term Creates Negative Impression. National Cattlemen’s Beef Association. http://www.beefusa.org/uDocs/factoryfarming.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2014.

  • Merz-Perez, Linda, Kathleen M. Heide, and Ira J. Silverman. 2001. Childhood Cruelty to Animals and Subsequent Violence Against Humans. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 45: 556–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napach, Bernice. 2014. How 4 Companies Control Almost All the Meat You Eat. Yahoo Finance. http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/how-four-companies-control-the-supply-and-price-of-beef--pork-and-chicken-in-the-u-s-eat-prices-224406080.html. Accessed 30 June 2014.

  • Pemberton, Simon. 2007. Social Harm Future(s): Exploring the Potential of the Social Harm Approach. Crime, Law, and Social Change 48: 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, Gary. 2010. What Is Green Criminology? Sociology Review. http://www.greencriminology.org/monthly/WhatIsGreenCriminology.pdf. Retrieved 18 Aug 2013.

  • Presser, Lois. 2013. Why We Harm. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presser, Lois, and Jennifer L. Schally. 2013. Institutionalizing Harm in Tennessee: The Right of the People to Hunt and Fish. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 40: 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinney, Richard. 1970. The Social Reality of Crime. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Carol, Geoff Lawrence, and Nigel Kelly. 2005. Beef Production and the Environment: Is It Really “Hard to Be Green When You Are in the Red?”. Rural Society 15: 192–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riise, Ingvill H. 2012. Natural Exploitation: The Shaping of the Human-Animal Relationship Through Concepts and Statements. In Eco-Global Crimes: Contemporary Problems and Future Challenges, ed. R. Ellefsen, R. Sollund, and G. Larsen, 133–156. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowman, Andrew N. 1988. Animal Anxiety and Suffering. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Rebecca, William Fremouw, Allison Schenk, and Laurie Ragatz. 2012. Psychological Profile of Male and Female Animal Abusers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 27: 846–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwendinger, Herman, and Julia Schwendinger. 1970. Defenders of Order or Guardians of Human Rights? Issues in Criminology 5: 123–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shover, Neal, and Aaron S. Routhe. 2005. Environmental Crime. Crime & Justice 32: 321–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivapalasingam, Sumathi, Cindy R. Friedman, Linda Cohen, and Robert V. Tauxe. 2004. Fresh Produce: A Growing Cause of Outbreaks of Foodborne Illness in the United States, 1973 Through 1997. Journal of Food Protection 67: 2342–2353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Philip. 2005. Why War? The Cultural Logic of Iraq, the Gulf War, and Suez. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • South, Nigel, Avi Brisman, and Piers Beirne. 2013. A Guide to Green Criminology. In Routledge International Handbook of Green Criminology, ed. N. South and A. Brisman, 27–42. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stibbe, Arran. 2001. Language, Power and the Social Construction of Animals. Society & Animals 9: 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, Gresham M., and David Matza. 1957. Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency. American Sociological Review 22: 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallichet, Suzanne E., and Christopher Hensley. 2004. Exploring the Link Between Recurrent Acts of Childhood and Adolescent Animal Cruelty and Subsequent Violent Crime. Criminal Justice Review 29: 304–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Nik. 2011. Criminology and Human-Animal Violence Research: The Contribution and the Challenge. Critical Criminology 19: 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyson Foods. 2013a. Fiscal 2013 Fact Book. http://ir.tyson.com/files/doc_downloads/Tyson%202013%20Fact%20Book.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2014.

  • ———. 2013b. Core Values. http://www.tysonfoods.com/Our-Story/Core-Values.aspx. Accessed 11 Aug 2013.

  • ———. 2016. Facts About Tyson Foods. http://ir.tyson.com/investorrelations/investor-overview/tyson-factbook/. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.

  • United States Department of Agriculture. 2003. Agriculture Factbook 2001–2002. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. http://www.usda.gov/factbook/2002factbook.pdf. Accessed 18 Aug 2013.

  • Wax, Douglas E., and Victor Haddox. 1974. Enuresis, Fire Setting, and Animal Cruelty: A Useful Danger Signal in Predicting Vulnerability of Adolescent Males to Assaultive Behavior. Child Psychiatry and Human Development 4: 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Rob. 2008. Crimes Against Nature. Portland: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Environmental Harm: An Eco-Justice Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, Rob, and Diane Heckenberg. 2014. Green Criminology: An Introduction to the Study of Environmental Harm. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton P. Flynn, (2011) Examining the links between animal abuse and human violence. Crime, Law and Social Change 55 (5):453-468

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schally, J.L. (2018). Introduction. In: Legitimizing Corporate Harm. Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67879-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67879-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67878-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67879-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics