The Geopolitics of Renewables—An Introduction and Expectations

  • Daniel Scholten
Part of the Lecture Notes in Energy book series (LNEN, volume 61)


This volume explores the geopolitics of renewables: the implications for interstate energy relations of a transition towards renewable energy. Noting the different geographic and technical characteristics of renewable energy systems vis-à-vis those of fossil fuels, it investigates specifically how these might (re)shape strategic realities and policy considerations of producer, consumer, and transit countries and energy-related patterns of cooperation and conflict between them. Focus is on contemporary developments and how they may shape the coming decades. The objective is to establish a comprehensive overview and understanding of the emerging energy game, one that puts the topic on the map and provides practical illustrations of the changes renewables bring to energy geopolitics and specific countries. To this end, a novel analytical framework is introduced that moves from geography and technology to economics and politics and developments are studied on three levels of analysis: (a) the emerging global energy game, winners and losers; (b) regional and bilateral energy relations of established and rising powers; and (c) infrastructure developments and governance responses. This introductory chapter lays the groundwork for a comprehensive overview of contemporary developments by introducing the topic and field of geopolitics of renewables, developing an analytical framework, and posing expectations on what the transition towards renewable energy most likely implies for interstate energy relations.


Geopolitics Renewable energy (system) Interstate energy relations Energy transition 


  1. Abrell, J., & Rausch, S. (2016). Cross-country electricity trade, renewable energy and European transmission infrastructure policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 79, 87–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnew, J. (1998). Geopolitics: Re-visioning world politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Akiner, S. (Ed.). (2004). The Caspian: Politics, energy and security. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
  4. Amineh, M. P. (2003). Globalisation, geopolitics and energy security in Central Eurasia and the Caspian Region. The Hague: CIEP Clingendael International Energy Programme.Google Scholar
  5. Amineh, M. P. (2007). The greater Middle East in global politics; Social science perspectives on the changing geography of world politics. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  6. Amineh, M. P., & Guang, Y. (Eds.). (2010). The globalization of energy; China and the European Union. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  7. Amineh, M. P., & Guang, Y. (Eds.). (2012). Secure oil and alternative energy; The geopolitics of energy paths of China and the European Union. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  8. Andrews-Speed, P. (Ed.). (2008). International competition for resources: The role of law, the state and markets. Dundee: Dundee University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ansar, A., Caldecott, B., & Tilbury, J. (2013). Stranded assets and the fossil fuel divestment campaign. Working Paper. Stranded Assets Program, Smith School of Enterprise and Environment (SSEE), University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Auty, R. M. (1993). Sustaining development in mineral economies: The resource curse thesis. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF). (2013). Strong growth for renewables expected through to 2030. Accessed April 2014.
  12. Bosman, R. (2012). Germany’s Energiewende: Redefining the rules of the energy game. The Hague: Clingendael International Energy Programme.Google Scholar
  13. Bouffard, F., & Kirschen, D. (2008). Centralised and distributed electricity systems. Energy Policy, 36, 4504–4508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boyle, G. (2004). Renewable energy: Power for a sustainable future (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Eyre, N. (2013). Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 53, 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. British Petroleum (BP). (2015). Statistical review of world energy 2015. Accessed 1 november 2016.
  17. British Petroleum (BP). (2016). Statistical review of world energy 2016. Accessed 1 september 2017.
  18. Bruninx, K., Madzharov, D., Delarue, E., & D’haeseleer, W. (2013). Impact of the German nuclear phase-out on Europe’s electricity generation—A comprehensive study. Energy Policy 60, 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brzezinksi, Z. (1997). The grand chessboard: American primacy and its geostrategic imperatives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Buijs, B., & Sievers, H. (2011). Critical thinking about critical minerals: Assessing risks related to resource security. The Hague: Clingendael International Energy Programme.Google Scholar
  21. Casertano, S. (2012). Risiken neuer Energie - Konflikte durch erneuerbare Energien und Klimaschutz (risks of new energy—risks posed by renewable energy and climate protection). Brandenburg Institute for Society and Security (BIGS), No. 9.Google Scholar
  22. Chester, L. (2010). Conceptualising energy security and making explicit its polysemic nature. Energy Policy, 38, 887–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chevalier, J., & Geoffron, P. (2013). The new energy crisis: Climate, economics and geopolitics. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Clingendael International Energy Programme (CIEP). (2002). Study on energy supply security and geopolitics. Report (TREN/C1-06-2002).Google Scholar
  25. Constantini, V., Gracceva, F., Markandya, A., & Vicini, G. (2007). Security of energy supply: Comparing scenarios from a European perspective. Energy Policy, 35, 210–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Correlje, A., & van der Linde, C. (2006). Energy supply security and geopolitics: A European perspective. Energy Policy, 34, 532–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Criekemans, D. (2007). Geopolitics: ‘Geographical consciousness’ of foreign policy? Ph.D. thesis. Garant.Google Scholar
  28. Criekemans, D. (2011). The geopolitics of renewable energy: Different or similar to the geopolitics of conventional energy? Conference paper. ISA Annual Convention 2011, 16–19 March 2011, Montréal, Canada.Google Scholar
  29. Dannreuther, R. (2010). International relations theories: Energy, minerals and conflict. POLINARES working paper, No. 8.Google Scholar
  30. De Ridder, M. (2013). The geopolitics of mineral resources for renewable energy technologies. The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
  31. De Vos, R., & de Jager, D. (2014). World Energy Outlook hides the real potential of renewables. EnergyPost. Accessed May 2017.
  32. De Vries, B. J. M., van Vuuren, D. P., & Hoogwijk, M. M. (2007). Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach. Energy Policy, 35, 2590–2610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Deudney, D. H. (1989). Global geopolitics: A reconstruction, interpretation, and evaluation of materialist world order theories of the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Dreyer, I. (2013). Renewables: Do they matter for foreign policy? European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) (p. 23). No: Brief Issue.Google Scholar
  35. Duan, H. B., Zhu, L., & Fan, Y. (2014). A cross-country study on the relationship between diffusion of wind and photovoltaic solar technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 83, 156–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dupont, C., & S. Oberthuer (eds.) (2015). Decarbonization in the European Union - Internal policies and external strategies. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
  37. Ecofys. (2008). Global potential of renewable energy sources: A literature assessment. Utrecht: Ecofys.Google Scholar
  38. Egenhofer, C., & Legge, T. (2001). Security of supply: A question for policy or markets?. Brussels: CEPS.Google Scholar
  39. Eisen, J. B. (2011). New energy geopolitics?: China, renewable energy, and the greentech race. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 9(86).Google Scholar
  40. Ellabban, O., Haitham, A.-R., & Blaabjerg, F. (2014). Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 748–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Energy Information Administration. (2013). International Energy Outlook 2013. Washington.Google Scholar
  42. Energy Information Administration. (2016). International Energy Outlook 2016. Washington.Google Scholar
  43. European Commission (EC). (2001). Green paper; Towards a European strategy for the security of energy supply. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  44. Ewertsson, L., & Ingelstam, L. (2004). Large technical systems: A multidisciplinary research tradition. In Olsson, M.-O., & Sjöstedt, G. (Eds.), Systems approaches and their application: Examples from Sweden (pp. 291–309). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Fischhendler, I., Herman, L., & Anderman, J. (2016). The geopolitics of cross-border electricity grids: The Israeli-Arab case. Energy Policy, 98, 533–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Fortes, P., Alvarenga, A., Seixas, J., & Rodrigues, S. (2015). Long-term energy scenarios: Bridging the gap between socio-economic storylines and energy modeling. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Friedman, T. L. (2006). The first law of petropolitics. Foreign Policy, May/June 2006.Google Scholar
  48. Geels, F. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 897–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gnansounou, E. (2008). Assessing the energy vulnerability: Case of industrialised countries. Energy Policy, 36, 3734–3744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Grin, J., Rotmans, J., Schot, J., Geels, F., & Loorbach, D. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development-Part 1. New directions in the study of long term transformative change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Gullberg, A. T. (2013). The political feasibility of Norway as the ‘green battery’of Europe. Energy Policy, 57, 615–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gullberg, A. T., Ohlhorst, D., & Schreurs, M. (2014). Towards a low carbon energy future—Renewable energy cooperation between Germany and Norway. Renewable Energy, 68, 216–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Haas, R., Eichhammer, W., Huber, C., Langniss, O., Lorenzoni, A., Madlener, R., et al. (2004). How to promote renewable energy systems successfully and effectively. Energy Policy, 32(6), 833–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hache, E. (2016). La geopolitique des energies renouvelables: amelioration de la securite energetique et/ou nouvelles dependances? (The geopolitics of renewables: Does more energy security come with more energy dependencies?). Revue Internationale et Strategique, 1(101), 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Haushofer, K. (1934). Weltpolitik von heute. Zeitgeschichte-Verlag Wilhelm Undermann.Google Scholar
  56. Haug, M. 2011. Clean energy and international oil. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 27(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Huebner, C. (n.d.). Geopolitics of energy transition. Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.Google Scholar
  58. Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of power, electrification in western society 1880-1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Humphreys, M., Sachs, J. D., & Stiglitz, J. E. (Eds.). (2007). Escaping the resource curse. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  60. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2004). World energy outlook 2004. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  61. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2013). World energy outlook 2013. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  62. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2015). A fundamental look at supply side energy reserves for the planet. SHC Solar update. Accessed May 2017.
  63. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2016). World energy outlook 2016. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  64. Johansson, B. (2013). Security aspects of future renewable energy systems—A short overview. Energy, 61, 598–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kaijser, A. (2005). How to describe large technical systems and their changes over time? In Jönsson, G. & Tengström, E. (Eds.), Urban transport development: A complex issue (pp. 12–19). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  66. Kissinger, H. (1994). Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  67. Klare, M. (2008). Rising powers, shrinking planet: The new geopolitics of energy. New York: Henry Holt & Company.Google Scholar
  68. Kroes, P., Franssen, M., Van de Poel, I., & Ottens, M. (2006). Treating socio-technical systems as engineering systems: Some conceptual problems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23(6), 803–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kruyt, B., van Vuuren, D., de Vries, H., & Groenenberg, H. (2009). Indicators for energy security. Energy Policy, 37, 2166–2181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ladislaw, S. O., Leed, M., & Walton, M. A. (2014). New energy, new geopolitics: Background report 1 and 2. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  71. Lesage, D., van de Graaf, T., & Westphal, K. (2010). Global energy governance in a multipolar world. Ashgate.Google Scholar
  72. Mackinder, H. J. (1904). The geographical pivot of history. Geographical Journal, 23, 421–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mahan, A. T. (1890). The influence of sea power upon history, 1660–1783. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  74. Meade, N., & Islam, T. (2015). Modelling European usage of renewable energy technologies for electricity generation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Menanteau, P., Finon, D., & Lamy, M.-L. (2003). Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy. Energy Policy, 31(8), 799–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Moriarty, P., & Honnery, D. (2016). Can renewable energy power the future? Energy Policy, 93, 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). (2008). Global renewable energy development. Washington.Google Scholar
  78. Nelson, R. (1994). The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(1), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nicolosi, M. (2010). Wind power integration and power system flexibility—An empirical analysis of extreme events in Germany under the new negative price regime. Energy Policy, 38(11), 7257–7268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nuttall, W. J., & Manz, D. L. (2008). A new energy security paradigm for the twenty-first century. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(8), 1247–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. O’Sullivan, M., Overland, I., & Sandalow, D. (2017). The geopolitics of renewable energy. Working paper. Columbia University, Harvard Kennedy School, and Norwegian institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  82. O’Tuathail, G., & Dalby, S. (1998). Rethinking geopolitics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  83. Ölz, S., Sims, R., & Kirchner, N. (2007). Contribution of renewables to energy security. Paris: IEA Information Paper.Google Scholar
  84. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). Divestment and stranded assets in the low-carbon transition. Background paper for the 32nd Round Table on Sustainable Development, 28 October 2015. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  85. Overland, I. (2015). Future petroleum geopolitics: Consequences of climate policy and unconventional oil and gas. Handbook of Clean Energy Systems (pp. 3517–3544). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  86. Oxford Dictionary (2012). Definition of geopolitics. Accessed January 31, 2012.
  87. Paltsev, S. (2016). The complicated geopolitics of renewable energy. Bulleting of the Atomic Sciences, 72(6), 390–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Parra, F. (2010). Oil politics; A modern history of petroleum. London: I.B.Tauris.Google Scholar
  89. Pascual, C. (2015). The new geopolitics of energy. Columbia, SIPA: The Center on Global Energy Policy.Google Scholar
  90. Percebois, J. 2003. Vulnerability and its management. OECD report, 51–62.Google Scholar
  91. Ratzel, F. (1897). Politische Geographie. München: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  92. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21). (2012). Renewables 2012 global status report. Accessed 2013.
  93. Resch, G., Held, A., Faber, T., Panzer, C., Toro, F., & Haas, R. (2008). Potentials and prospects for renewable energies at global scale. Energy Policy, 36, 4048–4056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Rinaldi, S., Peerenboom, J., & Kelly, T. (2001). Identifying, Understanding, and Analyzing Critical Infrastructure Interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21(6), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rothkopf, D. J. (2009). Is a green world a safe world? (p. 2009). Foreign Policy August/September: Not necessarily. A guide to the coming green geopolitical crises.Google Scholar
  96. Royal Symposium. (2015). Dam Palace, Amsterdam, 4 December 2015.Google Scholar
  97. Salzman, R. S. (2016). Will climate-change efforts affect EU-Russian relations? (Probably not). Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 72(6), 384–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Schleicher-Tappeser, R. (2012). How renewables will change electricity markets in the next five years. Energy Policy, 48, 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Scholten, D. J. (2013). The reliability of energy infrastructures; The organizational requirements of technical operations. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 14(2), 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Scholten, D.J., & Bosman, R. (2013). The geopolitics of renewables; A mere shift or landslide in energy dependencies? In Conference paper. PoliticologenEtmaal, Ghent, Belgium, May 30–31, 2013.Google Scholar
  101. Scholten, D. J., & Bosman, R. (2016). The geopolitics of renewables; Exploring the political implications of renewable energy systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Scholten, D. J., & Künneke, R. (2016). Towards the comprehensive design of energy infrastructures. In Conference paper. ECPR Conference, Tilburg, the Netherlands, July 6–8, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Scholten, D. J., Sattich, T., & Ydersbond, I. M. (2014). Power struggles: The geopolitical implications of EU energy policy. Energi og Klima. Accessed November 27, 2014.
  104. Shell. (2013). New lens scenarios; A shift in perspective for a world in transition. Shell International BV.Google Scholar
  105. Smith Stegen, K. (2014). The risks and rewards of renewable energies. In New realities: Energy security in the 2010s and implications for the US Military. Strategic Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  106. Smith Stegen, K., Gilmartin, P., & Carlucci, J. (2012). Terrorists versus the sun: Desertec in North Africa as a case study for assessing risks to energy infrastructure. Risk Management, 14(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Sovacool, B., & Mukherjee, I. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach. Energy, 36, 5343–5355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Spykman, N. J. 1944. The geography of the peace. Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
  109. Stang, G. (2016). Shaping the future of energy. European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), Brief Issue 24.Google Scholar
  110. Stoeglehner, G., Niemetz, N., Kettl, K.-H. (2011). Spatial dimensions of sustainable energy systems: new visions for integrated spatial and energy planning. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 1(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Streck, C., & Terhalle, M. (Eds.). (2013). The changing geopolitics of climate change. Climate Policy, 13(5), 1469–3062.Google Scholar
  112. Strunz, S., & Gawel, E. (2016). Importabhängigkeit und Energiewende—ein neues Risikofeld der Versorgungssicherheit? (import dependency and energiewende—a new risk for security of supply?) Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ). Discussion Paper. Department of Economics, 5/2016.Google Scholar
  113. Sweijs, T., de Ridder, M., de Jong, S., Oosterveld, W., Frinking, E., Auping, W., et al. (2014). Time to wake up: the geopolitics of EU 2030 climate and energy policies. The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
  114. Umbach, F. (2010). Global energy security and the implications for the EU. Energy Policy, 38(3), 1229–1240.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Van de Graaf, T. (2013). Fragmentation in global energy governance: Explaining the creation of IRENA. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Van de Graaf, T., & Verbruggen, A. (2015). The oil endgame: Strategies of oil exporters in a carbon-constrained world. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 456–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Verbong, G., & Geels, F. (2007). The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy, 35, 1025–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Verbong, G., & Loorbach, D. (Eds.). (2013). Governing the energy transition: Reality, illusion or necessity?. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  119. Verrastro, F., Ladislaw, S., Frank, M., & Hyland, L. (2010). The geopolitics of energy; Emerging trends, changing landscapes, uncertain times. CSIS report, energy and national security program.Google Scholar
  120. Weijnen, M. P. C., & Bouwmans, I. (2006). Innovation in networked infrastructures: Coping with complexity. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 2(2/3), 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Winzer, C. (2012). Conceptualizing energy security. Energy Policy, 46, 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. World Energy Council. (2008). Europe’s vulnerability to energy crisis, executive summary. Accessed October 20, 2013.
  123. Yergin, D. (1991). The prize: The epic quest for oil, money, and power. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  124. Yergin, D. (2011). The quest: Energy, security, and the remaking of the modern world. Penguin Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations