Skip to main content

Concurrent Design: Preplanning and Design Tasks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Web-Based Learning

Abstract

The designer’s attention turns to design at this stage in the WBID Model. Essential design tasks move the design and development process from analysis through development. At this point in the WBID Model, project plans are developed, tasks assigned to personnel, and tasks such as writing objectives, creating assessments, and establishing timelines occur. Throughout the process, continuous improvement through evaluation and enhancement occurs.

Once analyses have been conducted and evaluation plans formulated, attention turns to design and development. Design and development tasks can be completed in tandem, a process known as concurrent design. At this stage of the WBID Model, the designer formulates the design plan, writes objectives, and determines instructional and motivational strategies. The process then moves from design planning into prototyping. Formative evaluation is incorporated in to concurrent design to refine plans and prototypes as they are created. We divide our discussion of concurrent design stage into three chapters. This chapter focuses on design-related tasks—from preplanning through clustering objectives. Chapter 7 explores instructional and motivational strategies and introduces a new tool, the WBI Strategy Worksheet. In this chapter, we also discuss factors that affect design. Chapter 8 culminates the discussion by focusing attention on tasks such as storyboarding, flowcharting, and developing and evaluating prototypes.

This chapter begins with a description of preplanning activities, which include identifying design tasks, identifying personnel, and establishing a timeline for design and development procedures. We then discuss writing objectives and types of assessment strategies as well as how to complete the TOAB with objectives and assessment items. We close with a discussion of how to cluster objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(5). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.

  • Boulmetis, J., & Dutwin, P. (2011). The ABCs of evaluation: Timeliness techniques for program and project managers (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, R. M., & Merrill, M. D. (2012). Characteristics of instructional design models. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappuis, J., & Stiggins, R. J. (2017). An introduction to student-involved assessment FOR learning (7th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson-Shivers, G. V., & Rasmussen, K. L. (1999a). Designing instruction for the WWW: A model. In Collis & R. Oleiver (Eds.), Proceedings of ED MEDIA 1999: World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia, and telecommunication (pp. 1292–1293). Seattle, WA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/10427/

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson-Shivers, G. V., & Rasmussen, K. L. (1999b). Designing instruction for the WWW: A model. In B. Collis & R. Oliver (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World conference on educational media and technology 1999 (pp. 1292–1293). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson-Shivers, G. V., & Reese, R. M. (2014). Are online assessments measuring student learning or something else? In P. Lowenthal, C. York, & J. Richardson (Eds.), Online learning: Common misconceptions, benefits, and challenges (pp. 137–152). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education, Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical Solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. J. (2000). Implementation considerations for instructional design of Web-based learning environments. In B. Abbey (Ed.), Instructional and cognitive impacts of Web-based education (pp. 78–101). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • GagnĂ©, R. M. (1985). Conditions of learning and theory for instruction (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • GagnĂ©, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronlund, N. E., & Brookhart, S. M. (2008). Writing instructional objectives for teaching and assessment (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodell, C. (2005). Instructional systems development. Silver Spring, MD: ASTD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction (pp. 137–148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. S., & Richey, R. C. (2000). Rapid prototyping methodology in action: A developmental study. ETR&D, 48(63). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313401.

  • Kolowich, S. (2013, April 15). Behind the webcam’s watchful eye, online proctoring takes hold. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from: http://www.chronicle.com/article/Behind-the-Webcams-Watchful/138505.

  • Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraushaar, J. M., & Shirland, L. E. (1985). A prototyping method for the application development by end users and information systems specialists. MIS Quarterly (November), 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. B., & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional design. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, K. (2015). The trainer’s handbook (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F. (1997). Preparing objectives for effective instruction (3rd ed.). Atlanta, GA: CEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, E. K., & Lee, D. (2001). Rapid prototyping in the instructional design process. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14(3), 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormrod, J. E. (2016). Human learning (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W. J. (2002). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesbeck, C. K. (1996). Case-based teaching and constructivism: Carpenters and tools. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 49–64). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, W. J., & Kazanas, H. C. (2008). Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai. (2017). Web page. Retrieved from https://www.sakaiproject.org/

  • Shih, W., Tseng, S., & Yang, C. (2008). Wiki-based rapid prototyping for teaching-material design in e-Learning grids. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1037–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, K. A., & Staupe, A. (2010). The concurrent e-learning design method. In Z. Abas et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Global Learn Asia Pacific 2010 (pp. 4067–4076). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, S., & Bicklemeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 38(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, M. A., Frasciello, M., Tatnall, L., & Conover, V. (2001, December 1). Concurrent instructional design: How to produce online courses using a lean team approach. ITFORUM Paper (No. 56). Retrieved from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper56/paper56.htm.

  • Watson, G., & Sottile, J. (2010). Cheating in the digital age: Do students cheat more in online courses? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, XIII(1).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Davidson-Shivers, G.V., Rasmussen, K.L., Lowenthal, P.R. (2018). Concurrent Design: Preplanning and Design Tasks. In: Web-Based Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67840-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67840-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67839-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67840-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics