Skip to main content

Conducting Summative Evaluation and Research: The Final Stage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Web-Based Learning

Abstract

In the evaluation planning stage (refer to Chap. 5), the preliminary plans for the summative evaluation were developed. These plans provide a framework to prepare for and carry out the summative evaluation. Research can also be conducted during the final stage. Summative evaluation occurs at a predetermined point in the WBID life cycle, usually when major revisions are no longer taking place and the online course has been used by a large number or percentage of the target population. Its purpose is to determine the value and worth of online instruction. Planning, conducting, and reporting summative evaluation and research comprise the last stage of the WBID Model.

This chapter begins with a description of the purposes of summative evaluation and its main steps, followed by strategies for reporting results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Upper Saddle, River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., Wager, W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Belmont CA: Wadsworth/Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, M. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, J. (2011). Performance-based certification: How to design a valid, defensible, cost-effective program. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. B. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118(2), 282–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2011). Webpage. Retrieved from http://www.jcsee.org/program-evaluation-standards-statements.

  • Jolliffe, A., Ritter, J., & Stevens, D. (2012). The online learning handbook: Developing and using Web-based learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2017). Teaching online: A practical guide (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical research: Planning and design (11th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, G. E. (2017). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H., & Kemp, J. E. (2012). Designing effective instruction (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savenye, W. (2004). Evaluating Web-based learning systems and software. In N. M. Seel & S. Dijkstra (Eds.), Curriculum, plans, and processes in instructional design: International perspectives (pp. 309–330). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessmer, M. (2009). Writing online training tutorials: A user-friendly guide for designers and trainers. Denver, CO: Center for Innovations in Training Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, T. J., & Barker, L. (2001). Designing, implementing, and evaluating Web-based learning modules for university students. Educational Technology, 41(4), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Davidson-Shivers, G.V., Rasmussen, K.L., Lowenthal, P.R. (2018). Conducting Summative Evaluation and Research: The Final Stage. In: Web-Based Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67840-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67840-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67839-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67840-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics