Skip to main content

Forest Classification: Data-Analytical Experiments on Vertical Forest Layering and Flattened Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Vegetation Survey and Classification of Subtropical Forests of Southern Africa

Part of the book series: Geobotany Studies ((GEOBOT))

Abstract

In this chapter, we test whether the structural completeness (data stratified into structural layers—tree, shrub, herbaceous, epiphytes) in species-rich subtropical forests impacts on classification outcome. We manipulated a well-structured (multi-layered) data set by successive removing structural layers. We have found that the herbaceous layer (E1) and the epiphytic synusia (E0) do not play an important role in classification of the subtropical forests. Besides obligatory sampling the tree layer, it appears that sampling the complete shrub layers (E2α and E2β) layers is crucial, both for classification as well as for production of functional expert system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barkman JJ, Doing H, Segal S (1964) Kritische Bemerkungen und Vorschläge zur quantitativen Vegetationsanalyse. Acta Bot Neerl 13:394–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, 3. Aufl. Springer, Wien, AT

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierschke H (2000) Entwicklung und Stand der Systematik mitteleuropäischer Buchenwälder. Forst und Holz 55:467–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Feoli E, Feoli Chiapella L (1979) Relevé ranking based on a sum of squares criterion. Vegetatio 39:123–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feoli E, Lagonegro M (1984) Effects of sampling intensity and random noise on detection of species groups by intersection analysis. Stud Geobot 4:101–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent M, Coker P (1992) Vegetation description: a practical approach. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec J, Husová M, Neuhäusl R, Neuhäuslová-Novotná Z (1982) Die Assoziationen mesophiler und hygrophiler Laubwälder in der Tschechischen Sozialistischen Republik. Academia, Praha, CZ

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucina L, Geldenhuys CJ (2002) How to classify South African indigenous forests: approach, methods, problems, perspectives. In: Seydack AHW, Vorster T, Vermeulen WJ, Van der Merwe IJ (eds) Multiple use management of natural forests and woodlands: policy refinements and scientific progress. DWAF, Indigenous Forest Management, Pretoria, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucina L, Grabherr G, Wallnöfer S (eds) (1993) Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs. Teil III. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, DE

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucina L, Schaminée JHJ, Rodwell JS (2000) Common data standards for recording relevés in field survey for vegetation classification. J Veg Sci 11:769–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson HB (1982) The forests of the Umtamvuna River Reserve. Trees S Afr 34:2–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci L (1975) Measurement of redundancy in species collections. Vegetatio 31:65–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pignatti S (1998) I boschi d’Italia. Sinecologia e biodiversità. UTET, Torino, IT

    Google Scholar 

  • Podani J (2000) Introduction to the exploration of multivariate biological data. Backhuys, Leiden, NL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ladislav Mucina .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mucina, L., Tichý, L. (2018). Forest Classification: Data-Analytical Experiments on Vertical Forest Layering and Flattened Data. In: Vegetation Survey and Classification of Subtropical Forests of Southern Africa. Geobotany Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67831-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics