Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the relationship between civic association and the party politics institutionalization. Regardless of the theoretical perspectives focus on endogenous factors to the political institutions, I show that the strength of the citizen organizations is a key variable to evaluate the level of the party politics institutionalization. So, the presence of stable citizen associations with specific demands would incentive the emergence of consolidated and strong political parties. On the other side, the lack of strong citizen associations would drive that political parties be observed as electoral machines. Supported by historical narratives and electoral results in Ecuador (1979–2014), the chapter confirms when the citizen association is structurally weak, and the probabilities of the emergence of less institutionalized political parties increase.

This chapter is based in the article titled “Asociación cívica y desinstitucionalización de los partidos políticos en Ecuador: rupturas y continuidades, 1979-2014” which is published in Política y Sociedad, 53(3), 937–960.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    During local elections – provincial deputies and counselors and municipal city council members – on June 1, 1986, a question which mentioned the possibility of allowing nonmembers of political parties to run for office was included. The result of the referendum favored the NO.

  2. 2.

    What Menéndez-Carrión means is the absence of subaltern groups that represent the interest of the “common folk.” She tries to differentiate between those and the ones she calls oligarchic and bourgeois.

  3. 3.

    According to Hardin (2003: 164–165), institutional morale is the definition of objectives and probable effects.

  4. 4.

    Back in the 1980s, Partido Frente Amplio de Izquierda (FADI) was another receptor of union organizations demands. The passing of time brought FADI and PSE close until they merge into what is nowadays known as Partido Socialista-Frente Amplio (PS-FA) .

  5. 5.

    The mentioned labor reform was presented in bill 133 and turned into law on November 1991.

  6. 6.

    Currently, MPD has recovered as a political party although under a new nametag: Unidad Popular.

  7. 7.

    During president Correa’s visit to a police station on September 30, 2010, a group of police officers started a revolt that ended in the death of several people. According to the government, it was a failed coup in which the rebels tried to murder the president.

  8. 8.

    During the 2013–2017 term, Alianza Pais (AP) gained 100 seats, which represents 52.30% of the National Assembly.

  9. 9.

    Only two out the eight seats gained by PSC in 2013 actually came from the party. The remaining six were the result of alliances. Although four of those come from Movimiento Ciudadano Madera de Guerrero, which is a part of PSC based in Guayaquil. Thus, PSC’s pure representation is even lower than the one gained in the 1979–1984 term (4.34% of the total).

  10. 10.

    In the 1990–1992 period, PSC’s representation started showing a permanent increase. It went from 16 seats in the 1990–1992 term (12.21% of the total) to 21 seats in the 1992–1994 term (14.78% of the total) and finally to 26 seats in the 1994–1996 term (18.43% of the total).

  11. 11.

    During the 1984–1986, 1986–1988, and 1988–1990 electoral terms, PRE’s legislative representation went from three to four to eight seats (2.30%, 3.07%, and 6.10% of the total, respectively). During the 1990s their presence increased to 13, 15, and 12 seats in the 1990–1992, 1992–1994, and 1994–1996 electoral terms (9.92%, 10.56%, and 8.45% of the total, respectively).

  12. 12.

    Noboa ran for the presidency in 1998, 2002, 2006, 2009, and 2013.

References

  • Basabe-Serrano, S. (2016). Asociación cívica y desinstitucionalización de los partidos politicos en Ecuador: rupturas y continuidades, 1979-2014. Política y Sociedad, 53(3), 937–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreras, M. (2012). The rise of outsiders in Latin America, 1980-2010: An institutionalist perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 45(12), 1451–1482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiriboga, M. (2004). Desigualdad, exclusión étnica y participación política: el caso de Conaie y Pachacutik en Ecuador. Alteridades, 14(28), 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conaghan, C. (2008). Ecuador: Correa’s plebiscitary presidency. Journal of Democracy, 19(2), 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conaghan, C., & Espinal, R. (1990). Unlikely transitions to uncertain regimes? Democracy without compromise in the Dominican Republic and Ecuador. Kellogg Institute. Working Paper No 139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppedge, M. (2005). Explaining democratic deterioration in Venezuela through nested inference. In F. Agopian & S. Mainwaring (Eds.), The third wave of democratization in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dávalos, P. (2014). Alianza País o la reinvención del poder. Bogotá: Ediciones Desde Abajo.

    Google Scholar 

  • De La Torre, C. (2013). El tecnopopulismo de Rafael Correa. ¿Es compatible el populismo con la tecnocracia? Latin American Research Review, 48(1), 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, H., & Myers, D. (2007). From thaw to deluge: Party system collapse in Venezuela and Peru. Latin American Politics and Society, 49(2), 59–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dix, R. (1989). Cleavage structures and party systems in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 22(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freidenberg, F., & Alcántara, M. (2001). Los dueños del poder. Los partidos políticos en Ecuador, 1978-2000. Quito: FLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (2003). Moralidad institucional. In R. Goodin (Comp.), Teoría del diseño institucional. Barcelona: Gedisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, O. (1989). El poder político en el Ecuador. Quito: Editorial Planeta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, O., & Herudek, J. (1974). La organización popular en el Ecuador. Quito: Editorial Fray Jodoco Ricke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, C. (2004). Fujimori’s Ccoup and the breakdown of democracy in Latin America. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchheimer, O. (1966). The transformation of the Western European party systems. In J. LaPalombara & M. Weiner (Eds.), Political parties and political development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrea, G. (2009). Revolución Ciudadana. Quito: Grupo Editorial Planeta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S., & Cameron, M. (2003). Democracy without parties? Political parties and regime change in Fujimori’s Peru. Latin American Politics and Society, 45(3), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lora, E., & Panizza, U. (2002). Structural reforms in Latin America under scrutiny. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Documento de trabajo No 470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupu, N. (2014). Brand dilution and the breakdown of political parties in Latin America. World Politics, 66(4), 561–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machado Puertas, J. C. (2007). Ecuador: el derrumbe de los partidos tradicionales. Revista de Ciencia Política, 27, 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado Puertas, J. C. (2008). Ecuador: …hasta que se fueron todos. Revista de Ciencia Política, 28(1), 189–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, S., & Scully, T. (1995). Introduction: Party systems in Latin America. In S. Mainwaring & T. Scully (Eds.), Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mejía Acosta, A. (2011). Revolución o delegación ciudadana? Democracia, gobierno y rendición de cuentas en Ecuador. In G. O’Donnell, O. Iazzetta, H. Quiroga (Coord.), Democracia delegativa. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez-Carrión, A. (1986). La conquista del voto: de Velasco a Roldós. Quito: Corporación Editora Nacional-FLACSO Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez-Carrión, A. (1988). El análisis del proceso político en el Ecuador contemporáneo. En Estado, Política y Democracia en el Ecuador. Quito: Editorial El Conejo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez-Carrión, A. (1990). La democracia en el Ecuador: desafíos, dilemas y perspectivas. FLACSO Ecuador. Documento de trabajo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2011). Bankrupt representation and party system collapse. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2005). Building political parties: Reforming legal regulations and internal rules. IDEA Internacional. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/Acrobat/Building%20political%20parties.pdf.

  • Pachano, S. (2004). Partidos y representación en la Región Andina. En Partidos políticos en la Región Andina: entre la crisis y el cambio. Lima: IDEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachano, S. (2010). Ecuador: el nuevo sistema político en funcionamiento. Revista de Ciencia Política, 30(2), 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachano, S. (2011). Calidad de la democracia e instituciones políticas en Bolivia, Ecuador y Perú. Quito: FLACSO Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panebianco, A. (1990). Modelos de partido. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Liñán, A. (2007). Presidential impeachment and the new political instability in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polga-Hecimovich, J. (2013). Ecuador: Estabilidad institucional y la consolidación del poder de Rafael Correa. Revista de Ciencia Política, 33(1), 135–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. (2007). Latin American’s populist revival. SAIS Review, 27(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltos, N. (2010). El relevo: los dispositivos del poder. En N. Saltos (Ed.), El discreto encanto de la Revolución Ciudadana. Quito: Universidad Central del Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seawright, J. (2012). Party-system collapse. The roots of crisis in Peru and Venezuela. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silvert, K. H. (1976). Caudillismo. In Enciclopedia Internacional de las Ciencias Sociales. Madrid: Editorial Aguilar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, M. (1998). Los espejismos de la democracia: el colapso del sistema de partidos en el Perú 1980-1995 en perspectiva comparada. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. (2005). La democracia en América. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santiago Basabe-Serrano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Basabe-Serrano, S. (2018). Citizenship and Political Parties in Ecuador. In: Albala, A. (eds) Civil Society and Political Representation in Latin America (2010-2015). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67801-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67801-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67800-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67801-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics