Skip to main content

Interval Type–2 Defuzzification Using Uncertainty Weights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 739))

Abstract

One of the most popular interval type–2 defuzzification methods is the Karnik–Mendel (KM) algorithm. Nie and Tan (NT) have proposed an approximation of the KM method that converts the interval type–2 membership functions to a single type–1 membership function by averaging the upper and lower memberships, and then applies a type–1 centroid defuzzification. In this paper we propose a modification of the NT algorithm which takes into account the uncertainty of the (interval type–2) memberships. We call this method the uncertainty weight (UW) method. Extensive numerical experiments motivated by typical fuzzy controller scenarios compare the KM, NT, and UW methods. The experiments show that (i) in many cases NT can be considered a good approximation of KM with much lower computational complexity, but not for highly unbalanced uncertainties, and (ii) UW yields more reasonable results than KM and NT if more certain decision alternatives should obtain a larger weight than more uncertain alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Roychowdhury S, Pedrycz W (2001) A survey of defuzzification strategies. Int J Intell Syst 16(6):679–695

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Runkler TA (1997) Selection of appropriate defuzzification methods using application specific properties. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 5(1):72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saade JJ, Diab HB (2000) Defuzzification techniques for fuzzy controllers. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 30(1):223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Runkler TA, Glesner M (1993) A set of axioms for defuzzification strategies—towards a theory of rational defuzzification operators. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, San Francisco, pp 1161–1166

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liang Q, Mendel JM (2000) Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: theory and design. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8(5):535–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mendel JM, John RI, Liu F (2006) Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 14(6):808–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 8:199–250, 301–357, 9:42–80

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gehrke M, Walker C, Walker E (1996) Some comments on interval valued fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 11(10):751–759

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gorzałczany MB (1987) A method of inference in approximate reasoning based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 21(1):1–17

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Runkler TA, Coupland S, John R (2016) Interval type-2 fuzzy decision making. Int J Approx Reason 80:217–224

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Runkler TA, Coupland S, John R (2015) Properties of interval type–2 defuzzification operators. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, Istanbul, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karnik NN, Mendel JM (2001) Centroid of a type-2 fuzzy set. Inf Sci 132:195–220

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Nie M, Tan WW (2008) Towards an efficient type–reduction method for interval type–2 fuzzy logic systems. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, Hong Kong, pp 1425–1432

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mamdani EH, Assilian S (1975) An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int J Man Mach Stud 7(1):1–13

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Pfluger N, Yen J, Langari R (1992) A defuzzification strategy for a fuzzy logic controller employing prohibitive information in command formulation. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, San Diego, pp 717–723

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas A. Runkler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Runkler, T.A., Coupland, S., John, R., Chen, C. (2018). Interval Type–2 Defuzzification Using Uncertainty Weights. In: Mostaghim, S., Nürnberger, A., Borgelt, C. (eds) Frontiers in Computational Intelligence. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 739. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67789-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67789-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67788-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67789-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics