Skip to main content

Topic Extraction on Twitter Considering Author’s Role Based on Bipartite Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Discovery Science (DS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10558))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper proposes a quality topic extraction on Twitter based on author’s role on bipartite networks. We suppose that author’s role which means who were in what group, affects the quality of extracted topics. Our proposed method expresses relations between authors and words as bipartite networks, explores author’s role by forming clusters using our original community detection technique, and finds quality topics considering the semantic accuracy of words and author’s role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Qiu, X., Inagi, A.S., Nukui, S., Murata, T., Okamoto, H.: Random walk based community detection from bipartite networks. In: Proceedings of The 30th Annual Conference of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hashimoto, T., Kuboyama, T., Okamoto, H., Shin, K.: Topic extraction from millions of tweets based on community detection in bipartite networks. In: Proceedings of 27th International Conference on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases, pp. 409–424 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mimno, D., Wallach, H.M., Talley, E., Leenders, M., McCallum, A.: Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 262–272. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jaccard, P.: The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytol. 11(2), 37–50 (1912)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sayyadi, H., Raschid, L.: A graph analytical approach for topic detection. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 13(2), 4:1–4:23 (2013). Article No. 4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3(4–5), 993–1022 (2003). doi:10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, H.C., Luk, R.W.P., Wong, K.F., Kwok, K.L.: Interpreting TF-IDF term weights as making relevance decisions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 26(3), 13:1–13:37 (2008). doi:10.1145/1361684.1361686. Article No. 13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blei, D.M., Lafferty, J.D.: Topic models. In: Srivastava, A., Sahami, M. (eds.) Text Mining: Theory and Applications. Taylor and Francis, UK (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bhattacharya, I., Sil, J.: Query classification using LDA topic model and sparse representation based classifier. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IKDD Conference on Data Science 2016, p. 24. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Endo, Y., Toda, H., Koike, Y.: What’s hot in the theme: query dependent emerging topic extraction from social streams. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 31–32. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fujino, I., Hoshino, Y.: A method for identifying topics in twitter and its application for analyzing the transition of topics. In: Proceedings of DEIM Forum 2014. C4-2 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, Y., Agichtein, E., Benzi, M.: TM-LDA: efficient online modeling of latent topic transitions in social media. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 123–131. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao, W.X., Jiang, J., Weng, J., He, J., Lim, E.-P., Yan, H., Li, X.: Comparing twitter and traditional media using topic models. In: Clough, P., Foley, C., Gurrin, C., Jones, G.J.F., Kraaij, W., Lee, H., Mudoch, V. (eds.) ECIR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6611, pp. 338–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20161-5_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Newman, M.E.J.: Communities, modules and large-scale structure in networks. Nature Phys. 8(1), 25–31 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hottolink Inc. http://www.hottolink.co.jp/english

  16. MeCab: Yet Another Part-of-Speech and Morphological Analyzer. http://taku910.github.io/mecab/

Download references

Acknowledgment

This paper was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI Grant Numbers 26280090, 15K00314, and 17H00762) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takako Hashimoto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hashimoto, T., Kuboyama, T., Okamoto, H., Shin, K. (2017). Topic Extraction on Twitter Considering Author’s Role Based on Bipartite Networks. In: Yamamoto, A., Kida, T., Uno, T., Kuboyama, T. (eds) Discovery Science. DS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10558. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67786-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67786-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67785-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67786-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics