Skip to main content

Consequences of the Duality in Humans’ Relations to the World of Objects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A New Logical Foundation for Psychology

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSTHEORET))

Abstract

The duality of humans’ relations to objects’ form and features and to their existence as matter and continuous threads in time and space has far-reaching consequences for our capacity to accumulate and communicate empirical knowledge, for our knowledge of laws of nature, for our framing of sensory perception, and for emotions, affections, sentiments, motivation, love and solidarity, meaning and culture rooted in significant places, objects, and persons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The challenging experiences can of course also be just ignored or suppressed as we see with superstitious or prejudiced coping, unfortunately not a nonhuman animal privilege.

  2. 2.

    As said, language, as a medium or vehicle, is a guide to the specific human being in the world, already from infancy, and inaccessible to nonhuman animals. But it does not in itself create the specific human relation to the world. The guide is not the landscape.

  3. 3.

    For the purpose of the example, I ignore that the Danish police doesn’t care about bicycle theft.

  4. 4.

    The kilo is the last of the basic standards or units in physics being defined by choice of a particular. Eventually it will be defined by reference to elementary particles which are considered to be unchangeable.

References

  • Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977). The concept of the ideal. In Philosophy in the USSR. Problems of dialectical materialism (pp. 71–91). Moscow, Russia: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1956, orig. 1781/1787). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg, Germany: Felix Meiner

    Google Scholar 

  • Krøjgaard, P. (2017). On the theorem of correspondence. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 51(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9363-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. https://www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/index.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow, Russia: Progress Publishers. https://www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/index.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1982). Psychologie des Abbilds [Psychology of the perceptual image]. Forum Kritische Psychologie, 9, 5–9 (translated from a Russian manuscript, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1935). The conflict between Aristotelian and Galilean modes of thought in contemporary psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 141–177. Reprinted in: K. Lewin: A dynamic theory of personality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, pp. 1–42. (German original, 1931).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mammen, J. (1996). Den menneskelige sans. Et essay om psykologiens genstandsområde [The human sense. An essay on the object of psychology]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag (1st ed. 1983, 2nd ed. 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mammen, J. (2008a). What is a concept? Journal of Anthropological Psychology, 19, 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mammen, J. (2008b). Om betingelserne for objektiv erkendelse af kvantitative forhold. En praktisk-realistisk teori [About the conditions for objective quantitative knowledge. A practical-realistic theory]. I: A. B. Christiansen, T. Hetmar, J. Ivanouw & H. Kirkeby (red.). Metodologiske indblik og udsyn. Festskrift til Benny Karpatschof. Copenhagen, Denmark: Forlag for Psykologisk Forskningsmetode, pp. 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mammen, J. (2016b). A plea for scientific ambitions: Reply to commentaries from Martin Wieser, Nikolai Veresov, Asger Neumann, and Peter Krøjgaard. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9351-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mammen, J., & Mironenko, I. (2015). Activity theories and the ontology of psychology: Learning from Danish and Russian experiences. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 49(4), 681–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9313-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1844). Ökonomisch-Philosophische Manuskripte. Drittes Manuskript. In Marx/Engels (Ed.), Werke, Bd. 40. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1965–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, G. (1965). Experiments in plant hybridization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (original, 1866).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. (2016). Looking for a symphony. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 50(2), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9332-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Denmark’s Educational University. Reprint: Chicago University Press (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1977). On specific objectivity. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy, 114, 58–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F. (1964). Individuals. An essay in descriptive metaphysics. London, UK: Methuen (orig. 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mammen, J. (2017). Consequences of the Duality in Humans’ Relations to the World of Objects. In: A New Logical Foundation for Psychology . SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67783-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics