Skip to main content

The Permanent Crisis of Psychology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover A New Logical Foundation for Psychology

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSTHEORET))

Abstract

Psychology as part of philosophy and theology came to an end after mid-nineteenth century with Fechner’s and others’ introduction of a psychophysics defining a causal bridge from the physical world to the psyche. Psychology now shared the fate of the other humanistic disciplines, in danger of being eaten through the new gate to mechanistic causality and searching rescue in linguistic discourse without solid basis. Attempts to solve the problem through distinction between lower and higher mental functions, hierarchical systems, complexity, and holism are doomed to failure as long as being embedded in a mechanistic understanding of nature and of the individual’s interaction with nature. A modern understanding of nature going beyond mechanicism is needed but still does not solve the problem of the specificity of psychology in relation to natural science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It makes no difference, in principle, whether the organization of the higher mental functions is understood in terms of associations or in terms of “dialectical synthesis,” “affective synthesis,” “abstraction,” or “generalization” (Valsiner, 2015), when the basic interaction between the individual subject and the world is reduced to stimulation, however, “artificial,” “cultural,” or sign mediated. None of these “humanist” or “dialectical” predicates in themselves save you from the procrustean bed of mechanicism.

    But like mechanicism, as an approximation, in many ways is a useful tool dealing with inanimate nature, it may as well be useful in relation to humans when utilized within a frame of common sense. And some of Vygotsky’s instrumental concepts, as, e.g., the “zone of proximal development,” have been effective in educational and developmental psychology. But they do not contribute to the more basic solution of “the crisis in psychology.”

  2. 2.

    However, Vygotsky also contributed to theory of motivation, personality, and development with very seminal analyses and concepts, e.g., with the Russian concept perezhivanie, which has no simple translation into English, but rather some combination of emotional experience and motivated interpretation, closer to the German “Erleben.” See editors’ notes in (Vygotsky, 1994) and discussion in (Mammen, 2016b).

  3. 3.

    See my critique of the misuse of the concept of “degrees of freedom” in so-called hierarchical systems in Mammen (1997).

  4. 4.

    These positions have some similarity with classical stances of nominalism and epiphenomenalism.

  5. 5.

    As already mentioned “proximity” is often, in physics literature about quantum mechanics, referred to as “locality” in contrast to “non-locality.”

  6. 6.

    This was predicted by Niels Bohr (1958) but opposed by many contemporary physicists, among them Albert Einstein (Einstein, Podolsky, & Rosen, 1935). The controversy was, however, definitely resolved in Bohr’s favor after his death by some epoch-making experiments (Aspect & Grangier, 1986). In fact the controversy can be seen as being about the general logic of interactions in nature and not tied to theoretical and experimental details only accessible to experts. In Mammen (2016c) I try to explain this logic with a fictive example referring to communication between people which has an analogue structure to quantum mechanical entanglement between distant particles.

  7. 7.

    Bohr tried in many contexts (e.g., Bohr, 1958) to express this by referring to the uniqueness or individuality of quantum mechanical phenomena, perhaps with an inspiration from existentialism, but was apparently not understood by the contemporary scientific community.

  8. 8.

    This is the classical opposition of existence and essence. However, essence should actually be replaced by appearance, as essence is rather the dynamics behind changing appearances of the same matter or existence under changing conditions—as revealed in experiments—or in a process of development, as revealed when following a living individual through time. See later section: “What is Knowledge of Laws of Nature Beyond Patterns of Regularity?”

  9. 9.

    Even the founder of statistical interpretation of thermodynamics Ludvig Boltzmann tried!

References

  • Aspect, A., & Grangier, P. (1986). Experiments on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-type correlations with pairs of visible photons. In R. Penrose & C. J. Isham (Eds.), Quantum concepts in space and time. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (original 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N. (1958). Atomic physics and human knowledge. Lectures 1932–1957. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, K. (1998). The Jew of Linz. Wittgenstein, Hitler and their secret battle for the mind. London, UK: Arrow. (original 1997, Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A., Podolsky, P., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical descriptions of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47, 777–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelsted, N. (2017). Catching Up With Aristotle. A Journey in Quest of General Psychology. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51088-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratowski, K. (1961). Introduction to set theory and topology. Oxford/Warszawa: Pergamon/PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mammen, J. (1997). Om frihed og frihedsgrader [About freedom and degrees of freedom]. Forum for Antropologisk Psykologi/Journal of Anthropological Psychology, 2, 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mammen, J. (2016b). A plea for scientific ambitions: Reply to commentaries from Martin Wieser, Nikolai Veresov, Asger Neumann, and Peter Krøjgaard. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9351-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mammen, J. (2016c). http://vbn.aau.dk/files/260767691/A_Conversation_about_Entanglement

  • Valsiner, J. (2012). A guided science: History of psychology in the mirror of its making. New Brunswick/New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2015). The place for synthesis: Vygotsky’s analysis of affective generalization. History of the Human Sciences, 28(2), 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1927). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In R. Rieber (Ed.), (1997). The collected works by L. S. Vygotsky. New York, NY: Springer. http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/crisis/

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). New York, NY: Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky Reader (pp. 338–354). Blackwell, (Russian original, 1934). https://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1934/environment.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mammen, J. (2017). The Permanent Crisis of Psychology. In: A New Logical Foundation for Psychology . SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67783-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics