Advertisement

The Conceptual Argument: Re-Defining Religious Narrative

Chapter
  • 392 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Religious Studies book series (BRIEFSRESTU)

Abstract

This chapter introduces the idea behind the book. It deals broadly with the issue that the inspirational narratives of any religious origins involve a mixture of historical and legendary accounts. In terms of belief, fervour and meaning, it matters little to the ordinary believer in time which is which. At the same time, it points to the liability of any religion becoming a seedbed of fundamentalism if fact and legend are overly blurred and the symbolic nature of a religion’s inspirational narrative is not understood. It is argued that this is, in part, what has happened in Islam and some of the reason that religious radicalization has been so easy to fuel by Islamist radicals and so difficult to counter by Islamic authorities. The book then seeks to address this issue by exploring the formative narratives of Islam to see where history and legend coincide or deviate.

Keywords

Religious Narratives Narrative Literature Sacred Narratives Observatory Annals Collective Narrative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Gilliot, C. (1985). Portrait “Mythique” d’ibn ʿAbbās. Arabica, 32(2), 127–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests (J. Shapiro Trans.). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  3. Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and practice (J. Viertal Trans.). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  4. Habermas, J. (2002). Religion and rationality: Essays on reason, God and modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Narvaez, D. (2013). Neurobiology and moral mindset. In K. Heinrichs, F. Oser, & T. Lovat (Eds.), Handbook of moral motivation: Theories, models, applications (pp. 323–342). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ricoeur, P. (1971a). Critique of ideology. In G. Ormiston & A. Schrift (Eds.), The hermeneutic tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur (pp. 298–335). New York: SUNY Press. Google Scholar
  7. Ricoeur, P. (1971b). The model of the text: Meaningful action considered as a text. Social Research, 38, 529–562.Google Scholar
  8. Ricoeur, P. (1990). Time and narrative (3 volumes) (K. McLaughlin, D. Pellauer & K. Blamey Trans.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ricoeur, P. (1991). From text to action. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ricoeur, P. (2011). Paul Ricoeur: Poetics and religion (T. Hettema, P. Vandecasteele & J. Verheyden Ed. & Trans.). Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
  11. Taylor, C. (1985). Human agency and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Taylor, C. (1992). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Taylor, C. (2016). The language animal: The full shape of the human linguistic capacity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wallace, M. (2000). Second naivete: Barth, Ricoeur and the New Yale Theology. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  2. 2.University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia

Personalised recommendations