Abstract
This chapter presents a systems dynamics critique of the 2015 Paris Agreement on Climate established at the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP21) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Pledges under the Agreement are currently inadequate to limit global warming to safe levels. However, it is intended to be a system that evolves over time and changes state behaviour to encourage increasingly ambitious emissions reductions from members. The Agreement is designed to increase action through a ratchet mechanism obligating countries to put forward stronger targets, political pressure and a “signal” to investors to transition towards low-carbon portfolios and activities. An analysis using causal loop diagrams finds that none of these mechanisms for change are convincing. The legal wording of the Paris Agreement means that no “ratchet mechanism” exists. Political pressure through a pledge and review process has rarely worked in other international agreements or in previous international efforts on climate change. The idea of international law sending an investment signal is tenuous at best, and existing evidence in renewable energy and fossil fuel markets suggests that the signal is currently not functioning. Moreover, the Paris Agreement has inbuilt delay, making the lock-in of emissions-intensive trajectories likely. In short, the mechanisms for change designed into the Paris Agreement are unlikely to work. The Agreement as a system for changing state behaviour in a sufficient timescale is likely to fail.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Author’s personal observations of negotiations.
- 2.
“Entry into force” refers to the agreement becoming legally binding and operational. In the case of the Kyoto Protocol, this required at least 55 ratifying countries accounting for 55% or more of regulated greenhouse gases.
References
Aldy, J. E., Barrett, S., & Stavins, R. N. (2003). Thirteen plus one: A comparison of global climate policy architectures. Climate Policy, 3(4), 373–397.
Australian Government. (2015). Australia’s intended nationally determined contribution to a new Climate Change Agreement, Canberra, Australia. Retrieved from http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC/PublishedDocuments/Australia/1/AustraliasIntendedNationallyDeterminedContributiontoanewClimateChangeAgreement-August2015.pdf
Bertram, C., et al. (2015). Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90(PA), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001.
Bodansky, D. (2015). Legally binding versus non-legally binding instruments. In S. Barrett, C. Carraro, & J. de Melo (Eds.), Towards a workable and effective climate regime (pp. 155–167). London, UK: CEPR Press. Retrieved from http://voxeu.org/sites/default/files/image/FromMay2014/Climatechangebookforweb.pdf.
Bodansky, D. (2016). The Paris Climate Change Agreement: A new hope? The American Journal of International Law, 110(2), 288–319.
Carbon Tracker Initiative. (2013). Unburnable carbon 2013: Wasted capital and stranded assets (pp. 1–40). London: Carbon Tracker & The Grantham Research Institute, LSE. Retrieved from http://www.carbontracker.org/site/wastedcapital.
Climate Action Tracker. (2017). USA. Climate Action Tracker. Retrieved March 27, 2017 from http://climateactiontracker.org/countries/developed/usa.html
Davenport, C. (2017). Trump signs executive order unwinding Obama climate policies. New York Times. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/28/climate/trump-executive-order-climate-change.html
Frankfurt School and UNEP. (2016). Global trends in renewable energy, Frankfurt, Germany. Retrieved from http://fs-unep-centre.org/sites/default/files/publications/globaltrendsinrenewableenergyinvestment2016lowres_0.pdf
Glomsrød, S., Wei, T., & Alfsen, K. H. (2013). Pledges for climate mitigation: The effects of the Copenhagen accord on CO 2 emissions and mitigation costs (pp. 619–636). New York: Springer.
Harvey, F. (2015). Paris climate change agreement: the world’s greatest diplomatic success. The Guardian. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/13/paris-climate-deal-cop-diplomacy-developing-united-nations
Hatfield-Dodds, S. (2013). Climate change: All in the timing. Nature, 493, 35–36. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/nature/journal/v493/n7430/full/493035a.html%5Cnhttp://www.nature.com.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/nature/journal/v493/n7430/pdf/493035a.pdf
Heywood, P. (2013). Climate change negotiations—legally binding treaty or voluntary agreements: Lessons from international action on tuberculosis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(6), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.237.
Höhne, N. et al., 2017. “Action by China and India Slows Emissions Growth, President Trump’s Policies Likely to Cause US Emissions to Flatten”, Climate Action Tracker.
Jacquet, J., & Jamieson, D. (2016). Action by China and India slows emissions growth, President Trump’s policies likely to cause US emissions to flatten, Soft but significant power in the Paris agreement. Nature Climate Change, 6(7), 643–.646. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nclimate3006
Jotzo, F., & Kemp, L. (2015). Australia can cut emissions deeply and the cost is low. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University.
Kemp, L. (2016). Bypassing the “ratification straitjacket”: Reviewing US legal participation in a climate agreement. Climate Policy, 16(1), 1011–.1028. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14693062.2015.1061472
Kemp, L., & Jotzo, F. (2015). Delaying climate action would be costly for Australia and the world. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University.
Lux Research. (2016). A Trump presidency could mean 3.4 billion tons more U.S. carbon emissions than a Clinton one. Retrieved March 1, 2017 from http://www.luxresearchinc.com/news-and-events/press-releases/read/trump-presidency-could-mean-34-billion-tons-more-us-carbon
McGlade, C., & Ekins, P. (2015). The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature, 517(7533), 187–.190. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature14016%5Cnpapers2://publication/doi/10.1038/nature14016
Meinshausen, M., Jeffery, L., Guetschow J, du Pont Y R., Rogelj J, Schaeffer M., … Meinshausen, N. (2015). National post-2020 greenhouse gas targets and diversity-aware leadership. Nature Climate Change, 1306(October), 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nclimate2826
Pfeiffer, A., Millar, R., Hepburn, C., & Beinhocker, E. (2016). The 2C capital stock for electricity generation: Committed cumulative carbon emissions from the electricity generation sector and the transition to a green economy. Applied Energy, 179, 1395–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.093.
Rajamani, L. (2016). Ambition and differentiation in the 2015 Paris Agreement: Interpretative possibilities and underlying politics. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 65(2), 493–514. Retrieved from http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0020589316000130
Raustiala, K. (2005). Form and substance in international agreements. The American Journal of International Law, 99(3), 581–614.
Riahi, K., et al. (2015). Locked into Copenhagen pledges—Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90(PA), 8–23.
Rockström, J., Gaffney, O., Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2017). A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science, 355(6331), 1269–1271. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah3443.
Rogelj, J. (2013). Earth science: A holistic approach to climate targets. Nature, 499(7457), 160–161. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12406.
Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., et al. (2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature Climate Change, 534(7609), 631–639. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18307.
Rogelj, J., Nabel, J., Chen, C., Hare, W., Markmann, K., Meinshausen, M., et al. (2010). Copenhagen Accord pledges are paltry. Nature, 464(7292), 1126–1128. https://doi.org/10.1038/4641126a.
Schill, S. W. (2007). Do investment treaties chill unilateral state regulation to mitigate climate change? Journal of International Arbitration, 24(5), 8. Retrieved from http://0-www.kluwerarbitration.com.alpha2.latrobe.edu.au/print.aspx?ids=ipn28069
Shankleman, J. (2017). Clean energy investment drops 17% as China and U.S. Scale Back. Bloomberg. Retrieved April 24, 2017 from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-04-11/clean-energy-investment-drops-17-as-china-and-u-s-scale-back
Shearer, C., Ghio, N., Myllyvirta, L., Yu, A., & Nace, T. (2017). Boom and bust 2016: Tracking the global coal plant pipeline. Washington DC: Greenpeace.
The Economist. (2015). The Paris agreement marks an unprecedented political recognition of the risks of climate change. The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/international/21683990-paris-agreement-climate-change-talks
Tienhaara, K. (2011). Regulatory chill and the threat of arbitration: A view from political science. In C Brown, K Miles (Eds.), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (pp. 606–627). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2065706
UNFCCC. (2015). Paris Agreement. Paris, France: United Nations.
UNFCCC. (2017). United Nations framework convention on climate change: The Paris Agreement. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php
van Asselt, H. (2016). International climate change law in a bottom-up world. Questions of International Law, 26, 5–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kemp, L. (2018). A Systems Critique of the 2015 Paris Agreement on Climate. In: Hossain, M., Hales, R., Sarker, T. (eds) Pathways to a Sustainable Economy . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67702-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67702-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67701-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67702-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)