Advertisement

Towards the Applicability of NAO Robot for Children with Autism in Pakistan

  • Muneeb Imtiaz AhmadEmail author
  • Suleman Shahid
  • Anam Tahir
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10515)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a HRI study that reports on the potential of NAO as a socially assistive robot in Pakistan. Our findings generated through interviewing 2 parents and 5 teachers on the plausibility of using NAO robot as an interaction partner show that both groups welcomed the use of NAO at schools. They, however, were sceptical due to missing NAO’s facial expressions and certain body parts such as nose and lips. They also emphasised the importance of creating natural text to speech interface for the Urdu Language. Our findings taken from 7 autistic children to measure their level of social interaction during HRI revealed that children positively engaged with the NAO robot and showed a significant number of both verbal and non-verbal behaviours.

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder Children-robot interaction Socially Assistive Robots 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmad, M.: Design and evaluation of a mobile learning application for autistic children in a developing country. Ph.D. thesis, University Paderborn (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmad, M.I., Mubin, O., Orlando, J.: Children views’ on social robot’s adaptations in education. In: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 145–149. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahmad, M.I., Mubin, O., Orlando, J.: Understanding behaviours and roles for social and adaptive robots in education: teacher’s perspective. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction, pp. 297–304. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahmad, M.I., Mubin, O., Orlando, J.: Adaptive social robot for sustaining social engagement during long-term children-robot interaction. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. (2017, just-accepted)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmad, M.I., Shahid, S.: Design and evaluation of mobile learning applications for autistic children in Pakistan. In: Abascal, J., Barbosa, S., Fetter, M., Gross, T., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2015 Part I. LNCS, vol. 9296, pp. 436–444. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22701-6_32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ahmad, M.I., Shahid, S., Maganheim, J.S.: A game-based intervention for improving the communication skills of autistic children in Pakistan. In: Miesenberger, K., Fels, D., Archambault, D., Peňáz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) ICCHP 2014 Part I. LNCS, vol. 8547, pp. 513–516. Springer, Cham (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08596-8_80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frith, U., Happé, F.: Autism spectrum disorder. Curr. Biol. 15(19), R786–R790 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gilliam, J.E.: GARS-2: Gilliam Autism Rating Scale. Pro-Ed, Austin (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Häring, M., Bee, N., André, E.: Creation and evaluation of emotion expression with body movement, sound and eye color for humanoid robots. In: 2011 RO-MAN, pp. 204–209. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hetzroni, O.E., Tannous, J.: Effects of a computer-based intervention program on the communicative functions of children with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 34(2), 95–113 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hourcade, J.P., Williams, S.R., Miller, E.A., Huebner, K.E., Liang, L.J.: Evaluation of tablet apps to encourage social interaction in children with autism spectrum disorders. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3197–3206. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haider, I., Maroof Qureshi, M., Azeem, Q.F.: The autism puzzle (2015). https://www.dawn.com/news/1173610. Accessed 12 April 2017
  13. 13.
    Leite, I., Martinho, C., Paiva, A.: Social robots for long-term interaction: a survey. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 5(2), 291–308 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mundy, P.,: Development of socially assistive robots for children with autism spectrum disorders (2009). Institute10, M.I.N.DGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rao, P.A., Beidel, D.C., Murray, M.J.: Social skills interventions for children with asperger’s syndrome or high-functioning autism: a review and recommendations. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 38(2), 353–361 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scassellati, B., Admoni, H., Matarić, M.: Robots for use in autism research. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, 275–294 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shamsuddin, S., Yussof, H., Ismail, L.I., Mohamed, S., Hanapiah, F.A., Zahari, N.I.: Initial response in HRI-a case study on evaluation of child with autism spectrum disorders interacting with a humanoid robot NAO. Procedia Eng. 41, 1448–1455 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tapus, A., Mataric, M.J., Scassellati, B.: Socially assistive robotics. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 14(1), 35 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tapus, A., Peca, A., Aly, A., Pop, C., Jisa, L., Pintea, S., Rusu, A.S., David, D.O.: Children with autism social engagement in interaction with NAO, an imitative robot: a series of single case experiments. Interact. Stud. 13(3), 315–347 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tariq, S., Baber, S., Ashfaq, A., Ayaz, Y., Naveed, M., Mohsin, S.: Interactive therapy approach through collaborative physical play between a socially assistive humanoid robot and children with autism spectrum disorder. In: Agah, A., Cabibihan, J.-J., Howard, A.M., Salichs, M.A., He, H. (eds.) ICSR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9979, pp. 561–570. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Venkatesh, S., Phung, D., Duong, T., Greenhill, S., Adams, B.: TOBY: early intervention in autism through technology. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3187–3196. ACM (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muneeb Imtiaz Ahmad
    • 1
    Email author
  • Suleman Shahid
    • 2
  • Anam Tahir
    • 2
  1. 1.Human Machine Interaction Group, MARCS InstituteWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceLahore University of Management SciencesLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations