Skip to main content

Fuzzy Description Logics – A Survey

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10564))

Abstract

Mathematical Fuzzy Logics [51, 60] have a long tradition with roots going back to the many-valued logics of Łukasiewicz, Gödel, and Kleene [57, 68, 73] and the Fuzzy Set Theory of Zadeh [111]. Their purpose is to model vagueness or imprecision in the real world, by introducing new degrees of truth as additional shades of gray between the Boolean true and false. For example, one can express the distinction between a person x having a high fever or a low fever as the degree of truth of the logical statement \(\mathsf {Fever} (x)\). One of the central properties of fuzzy logics is truth functionality—the truth degree of a complex logical formula is uniquely determined by the truth degrees of its subformulas. This is a fundamental difference to other quantitative logics like probabilistic or possibilistic logics [56, 83].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/.

References

  1. Alsinet, T., Barroso, D., Béjar, R., Bou, F., Cerami, M., Esteva, F.: On the implementation of a Fuzzy DL solver over infinite-valued product logic with SMT solvers. In: Liu, W., Subrahmanian, V.S., Wijsen, J. (eds.) SUM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8078, pp. 325–330. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Borgwardt, S., Peñaloza, R.: On the decidability status of fuzzy \(\cal{ALC}\) with general concept inclusions. J. Philos. Logic 44(2), 117–146 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Hladik, J., Peñaloza, R.: Automata can show PSpace results for description logics. Inf. Comput. 206(9–10), 1045–1056 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Baader, F., Peñaloza, R.: Are fuzzy description logics with general concept inclusion axioms decidable? In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2011), pp. 1735–1742 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baader, F., Peñaloza, R.: GCIs make reasoning in fuzzy DL with the product T-norm undecidable. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2011), pp. 37–47 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baader, F., Peñaloza, R.: On the undecidability of fuzzy description logics with GCIs and product T-norm. In: Tinelli, C., Sofronie-Stokkermans, V. (eds.) FroCoS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6989, pp. 55–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24364-6_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bobillo, F.: The role of crisp elements in fuzzy ontologies: the case of fuzzy OWL 2 EL. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 24(5), 1193–1209 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bobillo, F., Bou, F., Straccia, U.: On the failure of the finite model property in some fuzzy description logics. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 172(1), 1–12 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Bobillo, F., Cerami, M., Esteva, F., García-Cerdaña, À., Peñaloza, R., Straccia, U.: Fuzzy description logics. In: Handbook of Mathematical Fuzzy Logic, vol. 3, 58, chap. XVI, pp. 1109–1188. College Publications (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bobillo, F., Delgado, M., Gómez-Romero, J.: A crisp representation for fuzzy \(\cal{SHOIN}\) with fuzzy nominals and general concept inclusions. In: da Costa, P.C.G., d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Laskey, K.B., Laskey, K.J., Lukasiewicz, T., Nickles, M., Pool, M. (eds.) URSW 2005-2007. LNCS, vol. 5327, pp. 174–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89765-1_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Bobillo, F., Delgado, M., Gómez-Romero, J.: Optimizing the crisp representation of the fuzzy description logic \(\cal{SROIQ}\). In: da Costa, P.C.G., d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Laskey, K.B., Laskey, K.J., Lukasiewicz, T., Nickles, M., Pool, M. (eds.) URSW 2005-2007. LNCS, vol. 5327, pp. 189–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89765-1_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Bobillo, F., Delgado, M., Gómez-Romero, J.: Crisp representations and reasoning for fuzzy ontologies. Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 17(4), 501–530 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Bobillo, F., Delgado, M., Gómez-Romero, J.: Reasoning in fuzzy OWL 2 with DeLorean. In: Bobillo, F., Costa, P.C.G., d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Laskey, K.B., Laskey, K.J., Lukasiewicz, T., Nickles, M., Pool, M. (eds.) UniDL/URSW 2008-2010. LNCS, vol. 7123, pp. 119–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35975-0_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Bobillo, F., Delgado, M., Gómez-Romero, J., Straccia, U.: Fuzzy description logics under Gödel semantics. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 50(3), 494–514 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Bobillo, F., Delgado, M., Gómez-Romero, J., Straccia, U.: Joining Gödel and Zadeh fuzzy logics in fuzzy description logics. Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 20(4), 475–508 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: A fuzzy description logic with product t-norm. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2007), pp. 1–6 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: Fuzzy description logics with general t-norms and datatypes. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160(23), 3382–3402 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: Fuzzy ontology representation using OWL 2. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 52(7), 1073–1094 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: Reasoning with the finitely many-valued Łukasiewicz fuzzy description logic \(\cal{SROIQ}\). Inf. Sci. 181, 758–778 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: Aggregation operators for fuzzy ontologies. Appl. Soft Comput. 13(9), 3816–3830 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: Finite fuzzy description logics and crisp representations. In: Bobillo, F., Costa, P.C.G., d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Laskey, K.B., Laskey, K.J., Lukasiewicz, T., Nickles, M., Pool, M. (eds.) UniDL/URSW 2008-2010. LNCS, vol. 7123, pp. 99–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35975-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: The fuzzy ontology reasoner fuzzyDL. Knowl.-Based Syst. 95, 12–34 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Borgwardt, S.: Fuzzy Description Logics with General Concept Inclusions. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Borgwardt, S.: Fuzzy DLs over finite lattices with nominals. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2014), pp. 58–70 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Borgwardt, S., Cerami, M., Peñaloza, R.: The complexity of subsumption in fuzzy \(\cal{EL}\). In: Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2015), pp. 2812–2818 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Borgwardt, S., Cerami, M., Peñaloza, R.: The complexity of fuzzy \(\cal{EL}\) under the Łukasiewicz t-norm. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning (2017, submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Borgwardt, S., Cerami, M., Peñaloza, R.: Łukasiewicz fuzzy \(\cal{EL}\) is undecidable. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2017) (to appear, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Borgwardt, S., Distel, F., Peñaloza, R.: Gödel negation makes unwitnessed consistency crisp. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2012), pp. 103–113 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Borgwardt, S., Distel, F., Peñaloza, R.: How fuzzy is my fuzzy description logic? In: Gramlich, B., Miller, D., Sattler, U. (eds.) IJCAR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7364, pp. 82–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31365-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Borgwardt, S., Distel, F., Peñaloza, R.: Decidable Gödel description logics without the finitely-valued model property. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2014), pp. 228–237 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Borgwardt, S., Distel, F., Peñaloza, R.: Gödel description logics with general models. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2014), pp. 391–403 (2014) (poster paper)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Borgwardt, S., Distel, F., Peñaloza, R.: The limits of decidability in fuzzy description logics with general concept inclusions. Artif. Intell. 218, 23–55 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Borgwardt, S., Leyva Galano, J.A., Peñaloza, R.: The fuzzy description logic \(\sf G\text{-}\cal{FL}_0\) with greatest fixed-point semantics. In: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2014), pp. 62–76 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Borgwardt, S., Mailis, T., Peñaloza, R., Turhan, A.Y.: Answering fuzzy conjunctive queries over finitely valued fuzzy ontologies. J. Data Semant. 5(2), 55–75 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Borgwardt, S., Peñaloza, R.: Description logics over lattices with multi-valued ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2011), pp. 768–773 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Borgwardt, S., Peñaloza, R.: Non-Gödel negation makes unwitnessed consistency undecidable. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2012), pp. 411–421 (2012) (poster paper)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Borgwardt, S., Peñaloza, R.: A tableau algorithm for fuzzy description logics over residuated De Morgan lattices. In: Krötzsch, M., Straccia, U. (eds.) RR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7497, pp. 9–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33203-6_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Borgwardt, S., Peñaloza, R.: Undecidability of fuzzy description logics. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2012), pp. 232–242 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Borgwardt, S., Peñaloza, R.: About subsumption in fuzzy \(\cal{E\!L}\). In: Proceedings of the 26th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2013) (2013) (poster paper)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Borgwardt, S., Peñaloza, R.: The complexity of lattice-based fuzzy description logics. J. Data Semant. 2(1), 1–19 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Borgwardt, S., Peñaloza, R.: Positive subsumption in fuzzy \(\cal{E\!L}\) with general t-norms. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2013), pp. 789–795 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Borgwardt, S., Peñaloza, R.: Consistency reasoning in lattice-based fuzzy description logics. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 55(9), 1917–1938 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Borgwardt, S., Peñaloza, R.: Reasoning in expressive description logics under infinitely valued Gödel semantics. In: Lutz, C., Ranise, S. (eds.) FroCoS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9322, pp. 49–65. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24246-0_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Borgwardt, S., Peñaloza, R.: Reasoning in fuzzy description logics using automata. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 298, 22–43 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Borgwardt, S., Peñaloza, R.: Algorithms for reasoning in very expressive description logics under infinitely valued Gödel semantics. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 83, 60–101 (2017)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Cerami, M.: Fuzzy Description Logics from a Mathematical Fuzzy Logic Point of View. Ph.D. thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cerami, M., Esteva, F., Bou, F.: Decidability of a description logic over infinite-valued product logic. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2010), pp. 203–213 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cerami, M., Straccia, U.: On the (un)decidability of fuzzy description logics under Łukasiewicz t-norm. Inf. Sci. 227, 1–21 (2013)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Ciaramella, A., Cimino, M.G.C.A., Marcelloni, F., Straccia, U.: Combining fuzzy logic and semantic web to enable situation-awareness in service recommendation. In: Bringas, P.G., Hameurlain, A., Quirchmayr, G. (eds.) DEXA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6261, pp. 31–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15364-8_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Cintula, P., Hájek, P., Noguera, C. (eds.): Handbook of Mathematical Fuzzy Logic, vol. 37–38. College Publications (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Dasiopoulou, S., Kompatsiaris, I., Strintzis, M.G.: Applying fuzzy DLs in the extraction of image semantics. In: Spaccapietra, S., Delcambre, L. (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics XIV. LNCS, vol. 5880, pp. 105–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10562-3_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  53. Di Noia, T., Mongiello, M., Straccia, U.: Fuzzy description logics for component selection in software design. In: Bianculli, D., Calinescu, R., Rumpe, B. (eds.) SEFM 2015. LNCS, vol. 9509, pp. 228–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-49224-6_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  54. Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Cadahía, O., Cuéllar, M., Lilius, J., Calvo-Flores, M.: Handling real-world context awareness, uncertainty and vagueness in real-time human activity tracking and recognition with a fuzzy ontology-based hybrid method. Sensors 14(20), 18131–18171 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Dienes, Z.P.: On an implication function in many-valued systems of logic. J. Symbolic Logic 14(2), 95–97 (1949)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibilistic logic - an overview. In: Computational Logic, Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 9, pp. 283–342. Elsevier (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Gödel, K.: Zum intuitionistischen aussagenkalkül. Anzeiger der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, vol. 69, pp. 286–295 (1932) (reprinted, Gödel 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Goguen, J.A.: L-fuzzy sets. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 18(1), 145–174 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Haarslev, V., Pai, H.I., Shiri, N.: A formal framework for description logics with uncertainty. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 50(9), 1399–1415 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Hájek, P.: Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic (Trends in Logic). Springer, Netherlands (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hájek, P.: Making fuzzy description logic more general. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 154(1), 1–15 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Hájek, P.: On witnessed models in fuzzy logic. Math. Logic Q. 53(1), 66–77 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Hájek, P.: On witnessed models in fuzzy logic II. Math. Logic Q. 53(6), 610–615 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. Hájek, P.: On witnessed models in fuzzy logic III - witnessed Gödel logics. Math. Logic Q. 56(2), 171–174 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Haniková, Z., Godo, L.: Petr Hájek, obituary. Fuzzy Sets Syst. (in Press, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hölldobler, S., Nga, N.H., Khang, T.D.: The fuzzy description logic \(\cal{ALC}_{FLH}\). In: Proceedings of the 9th IASTED International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (ASC 2005), pp. 99–104 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kang, D., Xu, B., Lu, J., Li, Y.: Reasoning for a fuzzy description logic with comparison expressions. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2006), pp. 111–118 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kleene, S.C.: Introduction to Metamathematics. Van Nostrand, New York (1952)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Klement, E.P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: Triangular Norms. Springer, Netherlands (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Kułacka, A., Pattinson, D., Schröder, L.: Syntactic labelled tableaux for Łukasiewicz fuzzy \(\cal{ALC}\). In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2013), pp. 762–768 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lisi, F.A., Straccia, U.: A FOIL-like method for learning under incompleteness and vagueness. In: Zaverucha, G., Santos Costa, V., Paes, A. (eds.) ILP 2013. LNCS, vol. 8812, pp. 123–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44923-3_9

    Google Scholar 

  72. Lu, J., Kang, D., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Zhou, B.: A family of fuzzy description logics with comparison expressions. In: Wang, G., Li, T., Grzymala-Busse, J.W., Miao, D., Skowron, A., Yao, Y. (eds.) RSKT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5009, pp. 395–402. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79721-0_55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  73. Łukasiewicz, J.: O logice trójwartościowej. Ruch filozoficzny 5, 170–171 (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Lukasiewicz, T., Straccia, U.: Managing uncertainty and vagueness in description logics for the semantic web. J. Web Semant. 6(4), 291–308 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Mailis, T., Peñaloza, R., Turhan, A.-Y.: Conjunctive query answering in finitely-valued fuzzy description logics. In: Kontchakov, R., Mugnier, M.-L. (eds.) RR 2014. LNCS, vol. 8741, pp. 124–139. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11113-1_9

    Google Scholar 

  76. Mailis, T., Stoilos, G., Simou, N., Stamou, G.B., Kollias, S.: Tractable reasoning with vague knowledge using fuzzy \(\cal{EL}^{++}\). J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 39(2), 399–440 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Mailis, T., Stoilos, G., Stamou, G.: Expressive reasoning with Horn rules and fuzzy description logics. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 25(1), 105–136 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Mailis, T., Turhan, A.Y.: Employing \({DL-Lite}_R\)-reasoners for fuzzy query answering. In: Proceedings of the 4th Joint International Semantic Technology Conference (JIST 2014), pp. 63–78 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Meghini, C., Sebastiani, F., Straccia, U.: A model of multimedia information retrieval. J. ACM 48(5), 909–970 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. Merz, D., Peñaloza, R., Turhan, A.: Reasoning in \(\cal{ALC}\) with fuzzy concrete domains. In: Proceedings of the 37th German Conference on Artificial Intelligence (KI 2014), pp. 171–182 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Molitor, R., Tresp, C.B.: Extending description logics to vague knowledge in medicine. In: Fuzzy Systems in Medicine, pp. 617–635 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Mostert, P.S., Shields, A.L.: On the structure of semigroups on a compact manifold with boundary. Ann. Math. 65(1), 117–143 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. Nilsson, N.J.: Probabilistic logic. Artif. Intell. 28(1), 71–88 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. Pan, J.Z., Stamou, G.B., Stoilos, G., Taylor, S., Thomas, E.: Scalable querying services over fuzzy ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 17th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2008), pp. 575–584 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  85. Sánchez, D., Tettamanzi, A.G.B.: Fuzzy quantification in fuzzy description logics. In: Fuzzy Logic and the Semantic Web, vol. 1, chap. 8, pp. 135–159 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Stoilos, G., Simou, N., Stamou, G., Kollias, S.: Uncertainty and the semantic web. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21(5), 84–87 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Stoilos, G., Stamou, G.B.: A framework for reasoning with expressive continuous fuzzy description logics. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2009) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Stoilos, G., Stamou, G.B.: Reasoning with fuzzy extensions of OWL and OWL 2. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 40(1), 205–242 (2014)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  89. Stoilos, G., Stamou, G.B., Kollias, S.D.: Reasoning with qualified cardinality restrictions in fuzzy description logics. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2008), pp. 637–644 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  90. Stoilos, G., Stamou, G.B., Pan, J.Z.: Classifying fuzzy subsumption in fuzzy-\(\cal{EL}\)+. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2008) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  91. Stoilos, G., Stamou, G.B., Pan, J.Z.: Fuzzy extensions of OWL: logical properties and reduction to fuzzy description logics. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 51(6), 656–679 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  92. Stoilos, G., Stamou, G.B., Pan, J.Z., Tzouvaras, V., Horrocks, I.: Reasoning with very expressive fuzzy description logics. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 30, 273–320 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  93. Stoilos, G., Straccia, U., Stamou, G.B., Pan, J.Z.: General concept inclusions in fuzzy description logics. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Confernce on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2006), pp. 457–461 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Stoilos, G., Venetis, T., Stamou, G.: A fuzzy extension to the OWL 2 RL ontology language. Comput. J. 58(11), 2956–2971 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Straccia, U.: A fuzzy description logic. In: Proceedings of the 15th National Confernce on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1998), pp. 594–599 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  96. Straccia, U.: Reasoning within fuzzy description logics. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 14, 137–166 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  97. Straccia, U.: Transforming fuzzy description logics into classical description logics. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3229, pp. 385–399. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30227-8_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  98. Straccia, U.: Description logics with fuzzy concrete domains. In: Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2005), pp. 559–567 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  99. Straccia, U.: Answering vague queries in fuzzy DL-Lite. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU 2006), pp. 2238–2245 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  100. Straccia, U.: Description logics over lattices. Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 14(1), 1–16 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  101. Straccia, U.: An ontology mediated multimedia information retrieval system. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL 2010), pp. 319–324 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  102. Straccia, U.: Foundations of Fuzzy Logic and Semantic Web Languages. CRC Studies in Informatics, Chapman & Hall (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  103. Straccia, U., Bobillo, F.: Mixed integer programming, general concept inclusions and fuzzy description logics. In: Proceedings of the 5th EUSFLAT Conference (EUSFLAT 2007), pp. 213–220 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  104. Straccia, U., Bobillo, F.: Mixed integer programming, general concept inclusions and fuzzy description logics. Mathware & Soft Comput. 14(3), 247–259 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  105. Straccia, U., Mucci, M.: pFOIL-DL: Learning (fuzzy) EL concept descriptions from crisp OWL data using a probabilistic ensemble estimation. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2015), pp. 345–352 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  106. Tresp, C.B., Molitor, R.: A description logic for vague knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 1998), pp. 361–365 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  107. Tsatsou, D., Dasiopoulou, S., Kompatsiaris, I., Mezaris, V.: LiFR: a lightweight fuzzy DL reasoner. In: Presutti, V., Blomqvist, E., Troncy, R., Sack, H., Papadakis, I., Tordai, A. (eds.) ESWC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8798, pp. 263–267. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11955-7_32

    Google Scholar 

  108. Venetis, T., Stoilos, G., Stamou, G., Kollias, S.: f-DLPs: Extending description logic programs with fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2007), pp. 1–6 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  109. Vojtáš, P.: A fuzzy EL description logic with crisp roles and fuzzy aggregation for web consulting. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU 2006), pp. 1834–1841 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  110. Yen, J.: Generalizing term subsumption languages to fuzzy logic. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1991), pp. 472–477 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  111. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  112. Zadeh, L.A.: A fuzzy-set-theoretic interpretation of linguistic hedges. J. Cybern. 2(3), 4–34 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Peñaloza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Borgwardt, S., Peñaloza, R. (2017). Fuzzy Description Logics – A Survey. In: Moral, S., Pivert, O., Sánchez, D., Marín, N. (eds) Scalable Uncertainty Management. SUM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10564. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67582-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67582-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67581-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67582-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics