Skip to main content

Metaphysics Without Substance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Natural Processes

Abstract

This chapter is a positive contribution to the debate regarding ontological priority. It aims to show that we should not dismiss process metaphysics and that we have naturalistic reasons for further developing a process metaphysics. In doing so, I first show how process metaphysics has been too easily dismissed for, what are likely to be, sociological reasons. I then argue that the very naturalistic developments in physics and biology that resulted in the questioning of substance metaphysics provide support for process metaphysics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armstrong, D.M. World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D.M. Universals and Scientific Realism. Vol. I. II vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auyung, Sunny Y. How is Quantum Field Theory Possible? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, Robert B. “Pragmatism, Inferentialism, and Modality in Sellars’s Arguments Against Empircism.” In Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars, edited by Willem A. deVries, 33–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, Douglas, and William T. Myers. Phillosophers of Process. Bronx: Fordham University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Keith. Abstract Particulars. Malden: Blackwell, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Richard. “A Process-Based Model for an Interactive Ontology.” Synthese 166, no. 3 (2009): 453–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Tian Yu. Conceptual Foundtions of Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald. “Intellectual Autobiography of Donald Davidson.” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, 3–70. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court Publishing Company, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, John. Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson. Structure of Appearance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Daniel W. Explaining the Cosmos: The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, Charles. Creative Synthesis and Philosophic Method. La Salle: Open Court Publishing, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. Logic. Vol. I, in The Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences, translated by William Wallace. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by L.A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, Meinard, Holger Lyre, and Andrew Wayne. Ontological Aspects of Quantum Field Theory. Singapore: World Scientific, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, M. “Analytical Ontologists in Action: A Comment on Seibt and Simons” in Kuhlmann, Meinard, Holger Lyre, and Andrew Wayne. Ontological Aspecs of Quantum Field Theory. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 99–110. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, Richard C. “Gene, Organism and Environment.” In Cycles of Contingency, edited by Susan Oyama, Paul E. Griffiths and Russell D. Gray, 59–66. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, John. “Why is Sellars’s Essay Called “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”?” In Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars, edited by Willem A. deVries, 9–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, Massimo, and Gerd B. Müller. “Elements of an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis.” In Evolution–The Extended Synthesis, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Gerd B. Müller, 3–18. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V. Word and Object. New York and London: Technology Press and Wiley, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V. “Autobiography of W. V. Quine.” In The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, 3–729. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas. Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas. Word and Object. New York and London: Technology Press and Wiley, 1960. “The Revolt Against Process.” The Journal of Philosophy 59, no. 15 (July 1962): 410–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “What is the Problem of Universals?” Mind 109, no. 434 (2000): 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Wesley C. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, Johanna. “The Myth of Substance and the Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness.” Acta Analytica, no. 15 (1996): 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, Johanna. “Quanta, Tropes, or Processes: Ontologies for QFT Beyond the Myth of Substance.” In Ontological Aspects of Quantum Field Theory, edited by Meinard Kuhlmann, Holger Lyre and Andrew Wayne, 53–98. London: World Scientific, 2002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, J. Process Theories: Analysis and Applications of Dynamic Categories, (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, Johanna, “Process Philosophy”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Accessed 9/1/2016, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, Wilfrid. “Foundations for a Metaphysics of Pure Process: The Carus Lectures of Wilfrid Sellars.” The Monist, no. 64 (1981): 3–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, Peter. Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, Peter. “Candidate General Ontologies for Situating Quantum Field Theory.” In Ontological Aspects of Quantum Field Theory, edited by Meinard Kuhlmann, Holger Lyre and Andrew Wayne, 33–52. Singapore: World Scientific, 2002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, Peter. “Farewell to Substance: A Differentiated Leave-Taking.” Ratio XI (1994): 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen and Co., 1959.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teller, Paul. An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooley, Michael. “The Nature of Laws.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7, no. 4 (December 1977): 667–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: The Free Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winters, A.M. (2017). Metaphysics Without Substance. In: Natural Processes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67570-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics