Abstract
The chapter traces the historical development of the ontological priority debate through the works of Thales of Miletus, Anaximander of Miletus, Anaximenes of Miletus, and Heraclitus of Ephesus. In doing so, I argue that the ontological priority debate has been framed in terms of either substances of processes. This claim serves as the basis of subsequent chapters to show that the substance framework and its respective methods have been adopted without having given adequate consideration to the process framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aristotle. Categories. Vol. I, in The Complete Works of Aristotle, edited by Jonathan Barnes, translated by J.L. Ackrill, 3–24. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Graham, Daniel W. Explaining the Cosmos: The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
Graham, Daniel W. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Testimonies of the Major Presocratics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Laertius, Diogenes. Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Vol. I & II. Hicks, R.D. (Translator). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1925.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winters, A.M. (2017). Introduction: Ontological Frameworks. In: Natural Processes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67570-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67570-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67569-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67570-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)