Advertisement

Machine Learning Applied to Optometry Data

  • Beatriz RemeseiroEmail author
  • Noelia Barreira
  • Luisa Sánchez-Brea
  • Lucía Ramos
  • Antonio Mosquera
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 137)

Abstract

Optometry is the primary health care of the eye and visual system. It involves detecting defects in vision, signs of injury, ocular diseases as well as problems with general health that produce side effects in the eyes. Myopia, presbyopia, glaucoma or diabetic retinopathy are some examples of conditions that optometrists usually diagnose and treat. Moreover, there is another condition that we have all experienced once in a while, especially if we work with computers or have been exposed to smoke or wind. Dry eye syndrome (DES) is a hidden multifactorial disease related with the quality and quantity of tears. It causes discomfort and could lead to severe visual problems. In this chapter, we explain how machine learning techniques can be applied in some DES medical tests in order to produce an objective, repeatable and automatic diagnosis. The results of our experiments show that the proposed methodologies behave like the experts so that they can be applied in the daily practice.

Keywords

Optometry data Dry eye syndrome Image analysis Feature selection Classification Regression 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain (project DPI2015-69948-R). Beatriz Remeseiro acknowledges the support of the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of the Spanish Government under Juan de la Cierva Program (ref. FJCI-2014-21194).

References

  1. 1.
    Paulsen, A.J., Cruickshanks, K.J., Fischer, M.E., Huang, G., Klein, B.E.K., Klein, R., Dalton, D.S.: Dry eye in the beaver dam offspring study: prevalence, risk factors, and health-related quality of life. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 157(4), 799–806 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gayton, J.L.: Etiology, prevalence, and treatment of dry eye disease. Clin. Ophthalmol. 3, 405–412 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu, J., Asche, C.V., Fairchild, C.J.: The economic burden of dry eye disease in the united states: a decision tree analysis. Cornea 30(4), 379–387 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lemp, M.A., Baudouin, C., Baum, J., et al.: The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the definition and classification subcommittee of the international dry eye workshop. Ocul. Surf. 5(2), B75–B92 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Craig, J.P., Tomlinson, A.: Importance of the lipid layer in human tear film stability and evaporation. Optom. Vis. Sci. 74, 8–13 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guillon, J.P.: Non-invasive tearscope plus routine for contact lens fitting. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 21(Suppl 1), 31–40 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Korb, D.R.: The Tear Film: Structure, Function, and Clinical Examination. Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nichols, J.J., Nichols, K.K., Puent, B., Saracino, M., Mitchell, G.L.: Evaluation of tear film interference patterns and measures of tear break-up time. Optom. Vis. Sci. 79(6), 363–369 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Calvo, D., Mosquera, A., Penas, M., García-Resúa, C., Remeseiro, B.: Color texture analysis for tear film classification: a preliminary study. Int. Conf. Image Anal. Recogn. 6112, 388–397 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramos, L., Penas, M., Remeseiro, B., Mosquera, A., Barreira, N., Yebra-Pimentel, E.: Texture and color analysis for the automatic classification of the eye lipid layer. Int. Work Conf. Artif. Neural Netw. 6692, 66–73 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Remeseiro, B., Penas, M., Mosquera, A., Novo, J., Penedo, M.G., Yebra-Pimentel, E.: Statistical comparison of classifiers applied to the interferential tear film lipid layer automatic classification. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2012, 1–10 (2012)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Remeseiro, B., Penas, M., Barreira, N., Mosquera, A., Novo, J., García-Resúa, C.: Automatic classification of the interferential tear film lipid layer using colour texture analysis. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 111, 93–103 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Remeseiro, B., Bolón-Canedo, V., Peteiro-Barral, D., Alonso-Betanzos, A., Guijarro-Berdinas, B., Mosquera, A., Penedo, M.G., Sánchez-Marono, N.: A methodology for improving tear film lipid layer classification. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. 18(4), 1485–1493 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Remeseiro, B., Mosquera, A., Penedo, M.G., Garca-Resúa, C.: Tear film maps based on the lipid interference patterns. 6th Int. Conf. Agents Artif. Int. 1, 732–739 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Remeseiro, B., Mosquera, A., Penedo, M.G.: CASDES: a computer-aided system to support dry eye diagnosis based on tear film maps. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. 20(3), 936–943 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Remeseiro, B., Barreira, N., Garca-Resúa, C., Lira, M., Giráldez, M.J., Yebra-Pimentel, E., Penedo, M.G.: iDEAS: a web-based system for dry eye assessment. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 130, 186–197 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    González-Domínguez, J., Remeseiro, B., Martín, M.J.: Acceleration of tear film map definition on multicore systems. Procedia Comput. Sci. 80, 41–51 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    González-Domínguez, J., Remeseiro, B., Martín, M.J.: Parallel definition of tear film maps on distributed-memory clusters for the support of dry eye diagnosis. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 139, 51–60 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Méndez, R., Remeseiro, B., Peteiro-Barral, D., Penedo, M.G.: Evaluation of class binarization and feature selection in tear film classification using topsis. Agents Artif. Intell. Revised Selected Papers ICAART 2013 2014(449), 179–193 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peteiro-Barral, D., Remeseiro, B., Méndez, R., Penedo, M.G.: Evaluation of an automatic dry eye test using MCDM methods and rank correlation. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 55(4), 527–536 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    VOPTICAL_I1, VARPA optical dataset acquired and annotated by optometrists from the Optometry Service of the University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Russ, J.C.: The Image Processing Handbook, 3rd edn. CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, FL, USA (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McLaren, K.: The development of the CIE 1976 (L*a*b) uniform colour-space and colour-difference formula. J. Soc. Dyers Colour. 92(9), 338–341 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bradski, G.: OpenCV. Dr. Dobb’s J Softw. Tools 25, 120–126 (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K., Dinstein, I.: Texture features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cybern. 3, 610–621 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Furnkranz, J.: Round robin ensembles. Int. Data Anal. 7(5), 385–403 (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dietterich, T.G., Bakiri, G.: Solving multiclass learning problems via error-correcting output codes. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 2, 263–286 (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Allwein, E.L., Schapire, R.E., Singer, Y.: Reducing multiclass to binary: a unifying approach for margin classifiers. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 1, 113–141 (2001)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., Schütze, H.: Introduction to Information Retrieval, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Loughrey, J., Cunningham, P.: Overfitting in wrapper-based feature subset selection: the harder you try the worse it gets. Res. Dev. Intell. Sys. XXI, 2005, 33–43 (2005)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Guyon, I., Gunn, S., Nikravesh, M., Zadeh, L.: Feature Extraction: Foundations and Applications. Springer Verlag, Berlin (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hall, M.A.: Correlation-based feature selection for machine learning. PhD thesis, The University of Waikato (1999)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dash, M., Liu, H.: Consistency-based search in feature selection. Artif. Intell. 151(1–2), 155–176 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhao, Z., Liu, H.: Searching for interacting features. Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence, 1156–1161 (2007)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mitchell, T.M.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, Boston (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Friedman, J.H.: Regularized discriminant analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 84, 165–175 (1989)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jensen, F.V.: An Introduction to Bayesian Networks, vol. 210. UCL press, London (1996)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Murthy, S.K.: Automatic construction of decision trees from data: a multi-disciplinary survey. Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 2, 345–389 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Burges, C.J.C.: A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 2, 121–167 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rosenblatt, F.: The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol. Rev. 65(6), 386 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fernandez-Caballero, J.C., Martnez, F.J., Hervás, C., Gutiérrez, P.A.: Sensitivity versus accuracy in multiclass problems using memetic pareto evolutionary neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 21(5), 750–770 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, vol. 13. Springer-Verlag, New York (1981)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kuo, Y., Yang, T., Huang, G.W.: The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 55(1), 80–93 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Opricovic, S.: Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Fac. Civil Eng. Belgrade 2(1), 5–21 (1998)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gautheir, T.D.: Detecting trends using spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Environ. Forensics 2(4), 359–362 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chang, C., Lin, C.: LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. on Intell. Sys. Tech. 2, 1–27, http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm (2011)
  47. 47.
    Bramer, M.: Principles of Data Mining, vol. 180. Springer, London (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yoneda, T., Sumi, T., Takahashi, A., Hoshikawa, Y., Kobayashi, M., Fukushima, A.: Automated hyperemia analysis software: reliability and reproducibility in healthy subjects. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 56(1), 1–7 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rodriguez, J.D., Johnston, P.R., Ousler, G.W., Smith, L.M., Abelson, M.B.: Automated grading system for evaluation of ocular redness associated with dry eye. Clin. Ophthalmol. 7, 1197 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wu, S., Hong, J., Tian, L., Cui, X., Sun, X., Xu, J.: Assessment of bulbar redness with a newly developed keratograph. Optom. Vis. Sci. 92(8), 892–899 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tort, M., Ornberg, R., Lay, B., Danno, R., Soong, F., Salapatek, A.: Development of an objective assessment of conjunctival hyperemia elicited via Conjunctival Allergen Provocation Testing (CAPT) and Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) testing. EEC (N = 13) 2, 5 (2012)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wald, M.J., Lay, B., Danno, R., Grosskreutz, C.L., Chandra, S.: Performance of automated hyperemia assessment in allergic conjunctivitis interventional study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 56, 12300 (2015)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Downie, L.E., Keller, P.R., Vingrys, A.J.: Assessing ocular bulbar redness: a comparison of methods. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 36(2), 132–139 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Amparo, F., Wang, H., Emami-Naeini, P., Karimian, P., Dana, R.: The ocular redness index: a novel automated method for measuring ocular injectiona novel automated system to measure redness. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54(7), 4821–4826 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Papas, E.B.: Key factors in the subjective and objective assessment of conjunctival erythema. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41(3), 687–691 (2000)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wolffsohn, J.S., Purslow, C.: Clinical monitoring of ocular physiology using digital image analysis. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 26(1), 27–35 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Efron, N., Morgan, P.B., Katsara, S.S.: Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 21(1), 17–29 (2001)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fieguth, P., Simpson, T.: Automated measurement of bulbar redness. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 43(2), 340–347 (2002)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Murphy, P.J., Lau, J.S.C., Sim, M.M.L., Woods, R.L.: How red is a white eye? Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperemia. Eye 21(5), 633–638 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wolffsohn, J.S.: Incremental nature of anterior eye grading scales determined by objective image analysis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 88(11), 1434–1438 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sánchez, L., Barreira, N., Pena-Verdeal, H., Yebra-Pimentel, E.: A Novel Framework for Hyperemia Grading Based on Artificial Neural Networks, pp. 263–275. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sánchez, L., Barreira, N., Sánchez, N., Mosquera, A., Pena-Verdeal, H., Yebra-Pimentel, E.: On the analysis of local and global features for hyperemia grading. Ninth Int. Conf. Mach. Vis. 10341, 103411T–103411T (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sánchez-Brea, M.L., Barreira-Rodrguez, N., Mosquera-González, A., Evans, K., Pena-Verdeal, H.: Defining the optimal region of interest for hyperemia grading in the bulbar conjunctiva. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2016, 1–9 (2016)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Vázquez, S.G., Barreira, N., Penedo, M.G., Pena-Seijo, M., Gómez-Ulla, F.: Evaluation of SIRIUS retinal vessel width measurement in REVIEW dataset. IEEE 26th Int. Symp. Comp. Med. Syst. 2013, 71–76 (2013)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Robnik-Šikonja, M., Kononenko, I.: An adaptation of Relief for attribute estimation in regression. In Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference, 296–304 (1997)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Quinlan, J.R.: Learning with continuous classes. Aust. Jt Conf. Artif. Intell. 92, 343–348 (1992)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Shevade, S.K., Keerthi, S.S., Bhattacharyya, C., Murthy, K.R.K.: Improvements to the SMO algorithm for SVM regression. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 11(5), 1188–1193 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., Vapnik, V.: Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach. Learn. 46(1–3), 389–422 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sánchez-Brea, M.L., Barreira, N., Sánchez-Maroño, N., Mosquera, A., García-Resúa, C., Giráldez-Fernández, M.J.: On the development of conjunctival hyperemia computer-assisted diagnosis tools: Influence of feature selection and class imbalance in automatic gradings. Artif. Intell. Med. 71, 30–42 (2016)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sanchez, L., Barreira, N., Mosquera, A., Pena-Verdeal, H., Yebra-Pimentel, E.: Comparing machine learning techniques in a hyperemia grading framework. Int. Conf. Agents Artif. Intell. 2, 423–429 (2016)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Baum, E.B.: On the capabilities of multilayer perceptrons. J Complexity 4(3), 193–215 (1988)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Park, J., Sandberg, I.W.: Universal approximation using radial-basis-function networks. Neural Comput. 3(2), 246–257 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Kohonen, T.: The self-organizing map. Neurocomputing 21(1–3), 1–6 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kohonen, T.: Improved versions of learning vector quantization. Int. Jt Conf. Neural Netw. 1990, 545–550 (1990)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1(1), 81–106 (1986)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Smola, A.J., Schölkopf, B.: A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat. Comput. 14(3), 199–222 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Dudani, S.A.: The distance-weighted k-nearest-neighbor rule. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 6(4), 325–327 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Abdi, H.: Partial least square regression (PLS regression). Encycl. Res. Methods Soc. Sci. 6(4), 792–795, 2003Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    John, G.H., Langley, P.: Estimating continuous distributions in bayesian classifiers.Conf. Uncertainty Artif. Intell. 1995, 338–345, (1995)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Abelson, M.B., Ousler, G.W., Nally, L.A., Welch, D., Krenzer, K.: Alternative reference values for tear film break up time in normal and dry eye Populations. In Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes 3, pp. 1121–1125. Springer, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    King-Smith, P.E., Fink, B.A., Nichol J.J., Braun, R.J., McFadden, G.B.: The contribution of lipid layer movement to tear film thinning and breakup. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 50, 2747–2756 (2009)Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Bitton, E., Lovasik, J. V.: Longitudinal analysis of precorneal tear film rupture patterns. In Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes 2, pp. 381–389. Springer, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Yedidya,T., Hartley, R., Guillon, J.P.: Automatic detection of pre-ocular tear film break-up sequence in dry eyes. Digit. Image Comput. Tech. and Appl., 2008, 442–448 (2008)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Cebreiro, E., Ramos, L., Mosquera, A., Barreira, N., Penedo, M.G.: Automation of the tear film break-up time test. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies, 123 (2011)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Ramos, L., Barreira, N., Mosquera, A., Currás, M., Pena-Verdeal, H. Giráldez, M.J., Penedo, M.G: Adaptive parameter computation for the automatic measure of the Tear Break-Up Time. 16th International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems, 243, 1370–1379 (2012)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ramos, L., Barreira, N., Mosquera, A., Penedo, M.G., Yebra-Pimentel, E., García-Resúa, C.: Analysis of parameters for the automatic computation of the tear film break-up time test based on cclru standards. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 113(3), 715–724 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ramos, L., Barreira, N., Pena-Verdeal, H., Giráldez, M.J., Yebra-Pimentel, E.: Computational approach for tear film assessment based on break-up dynamics. Biosys. Eng. 138, 90–103 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Ramos, L., Barreira, N., Mosquera, A., Pena-Verdeal, H., Yebra-Pimentel, E.: Break-up analysis of the tear film based on time, location, size and shape of the rupture area. International Conference Image Analysis and Recognition, 695–702 (2013)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Foracchia, M., Grisan, E., Ruggeri, A.: Luminosity and contrast normalization in retinal images. Med. Image Anal. 9(3), 179–190 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Arora, S., Acharya, J., Verma, A., Prasanta, K.: Panigrahi. Multilevel thresholding for image segmentation through a fast statistical recursive algorithm. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 29(2), 119–125 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Dougherty, E.R.: An introduction to morphological image processing. SPIE Optical Engineering Press, Tutorial texts in optical engineering (1992)Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Suzuki, S., Abe, K.: Topological structural analysis of digitized binary images by border following. Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. 30(1), 32–46 (1985)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Hu, M.: Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants, computer methods in image analysis. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 8, 179–187 (1962)Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Reed-Teague, M.: Image analysis via the general theory of moments. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70(8), 920–930 (1980)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Nunes, J.F., Moreira, P.M., Tavares, J.M.R.S: Shape based image retrieval and classification. 5th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (2010)Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Rodriguez, J., Perez, A., Lozano, J.: Sensitivity analysis of k-fold cross validation in prediction error estimation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 32(3), 569–575 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal Component Analysis. Springer Verlag, New York (1986)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beatriz Remeseiro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Noelia Barreira
    • 2
  • Luisa Sánchez-Brea
    • 2
  • Lucía Ramos
    • 2
  • Antonio Mosquera
    • 3
  1. 1.Departament de Matemàtiques i InformàticaUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de ComputaciónUniversidade da CoruñaA CoruñaSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de Electrónica y ComputaciónUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options