Skip to main content

Towards a Protocol for Inferring Preferences Using Majority-rule Sorting Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Decision Theory (ADT 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10576))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 839 Accesses

Abstract

In Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding, one of the current challenges involves the proper integration and tuning of the preference models in real-life contexts. In this article, we consider the multi-criteria sorting problem where the decision maker’s preferences fall within the outranking paradigm. Following recent advances on extensions of classical majority-rule sorting models, we propose a methodology for adapting them to the perspective of the decision maker. We illustrate the application of the methodology on a real-world problem linked to the evaluation of contributors within Free/Libre Open Source Software communities. The experiments that we have carried out show that the various considered model extensions appear to be useful from the perspective of decision makers in a real-life preference elicitation process, and that the proposed methodology gives useful indications that can serve as guidelines for analysts involved in other elicitation processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bigaret, S., Hodgett, R.E., Meyer, P., Mironova, T., Olteanu, A.-L.: Supporting the multi-criteria decision aiding process: R and the MCDA package. EURO J. Decis. Processes 1–26 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bisdorff, R.: On polarizing outranking relations with large performance differences. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 20(1–2), 3–12 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T.: An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, I: the case of two categories. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178(1), 217–245 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T.: An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, II: more than two categories. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178(1), 246–276 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dias, L.C., Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., Clímaco, J.N.: An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 138(2), 332–348 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: A new rough set approach to multicriteria and multiattribute classification. In: Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.) RSCTC 1998. LNCS, vol. 1424, pp. 60–67. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). doi:10.1007/3-540-69115-4_9

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Meyer, P., Olteanu, A.-L.: Integrating large positive and negative performance differences into multicriteria majority-rule sorting models. Comput. Oper. Res. 81, 216–230 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Mousseau, V., Dias, L.C., Figueira, J.: Dealing with inconsistent judgments in multiple criteria sorting models. 4OR 4(3), 145–158 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R.: Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. J. Glob. Optim. 12(2), 157–174 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R., Zielniewicz, P.: A user-oriented implementation of the ELECTRE TRI method integrating preference elicitation support. Comput. Oper. Res. 27(7–8), 757–777 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roy, B.: The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theor. Decis. 31, 49–73 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Roy, B.: Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Roy, B., Słowiński, R.: Handling effects of reinforced preference and counter-veto in credibility of outranking. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 188(1), 185–190 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported, in part, by Science Foundation Ireland grants 10/CE/I1855 and 13/RC/2094 to Lero - the Irish Software Research Centre (www.lero.ie).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandru-Liviu Olteanu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Olteanu, AL., Meyer, P., Barcomb, A., Jullien, N. (2017). Towards a Protocol for Inferring Preferences Using Majority-rule Sorting Models. In: Rothe, J. (eds) Algorithmic Decision Theory. ADT 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10576. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67504-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67504-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67503-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67504-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics