Skip to main content

Performance Indicators for Online Secondary Education: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
BNAIC 2016: Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2016)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 765))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

There is little consensus about what variables extracted from learner data are the most reliable indicators of learning performance. The aim of this study is to determine such indicators by taking a wide range of variables into consideration concerning overall learning activity and content processing. A genetic algorithm is used for the selection process and variables are evaluated based on their predictive power in a classification task. Variables extracted from exercise activities turn out to be most informative. Exercises designed to train students in understanding and applying material are found to be especially informative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.thiememeulenhoff.nl/voortgezet-onderwijs/mens-en-maatschappij/aardrijkskunde/de-geo-onderbouw-9e-editie.

  2. 2.

    GA implementation from the DEAP library for evolutionary algorithms [2] was used.

References

  1. Esmeijer, J., van der Plas, A.: Learning Analytics en Zelfsturend Leren. TNO R10373 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fortin, F.A., De Rainville, F.M., Gardner, M.A., Parizeau, M., Gagné, C.: DEAP: evolutionary algorithms made easy. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13, 2171–2175 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Guyon, I., Elisseeff, A.: An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1157–1182 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim, J.: Estimating classification error rate: Repeated cross-validation, repeated hold-out and bootstrap. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 53, 3735–3745 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Kotsiantis, S., Pierrakeas, C., Pintelas, P.: Predicting students’ performance in distance learning using machine learning techniques. Appl. Artif. Intell. 18, 411–426 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krathwohl, D.R.: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract. 41, 212–218 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Macfadyen, L.P., Dawson, S.: Mining LMS data to develop an early warning system for educators: a proof of concept. Comput. Educ. 54, 588–599 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Minaei-Bidgoli, B.: Predicting student performance: an application of data mining methods with an educational web-based system. Comput. Educ. 47, 157–167 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Morris, L.V., Finnegan, C., Wu, S.: Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses. Internet High. Educ. 8, 221–231 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., Duchesnay, E.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Romero, C., Ventura, S., García, E.: Data mining in course management systems: moodle case study and tutorial. Comput. Educ. 51, 368–384 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sánchez-Maroño, N., Alonso-Betanzos, A., Tombilla-Sanromán, M.: Filter methods for feature selection – a comparative study. In: Yin, H., Tino, P., Corchado, E., Byrne, W., Yao, X. (eds.) IDEAL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4881, pp. 178–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77226-2_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Shahiri, A.M., Husain, W.: A review on predicting student’s performance using data mining techniques. Procedia Comput. Sci. 72, 414–422 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tempelaar, D.T., Rienties, B., Giesbers, B.: In search for the most informative data for feedback generation; Learning Analytics in a data-rich context. Comput. Human Behav. 47, 157–167 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wolff, A., Zdrahal, Z., Nikolov, A., Pantucek, M.: Improving retention: predicting at-risk students by analysing clicking behaviour in a virtual learning environment. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on LAK’33, pp. 145–149 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank ThiemeMeulenhoff for providing the resources for this study. Special thanks go to Joost Borsboom, Gilian Halewijn, Wouter van Rennes, Emiel Ubink and Johan Verhaar.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bert Bredeweg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Diepen, P., Bredeweg, B. (2017). Performance Indicators for Online Secondary Education: A Case Study. In: Bosse, T., Bredeweg, B. (eds) BNAIC 2016: Artificial Intelligence. BNAIC 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 765. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67468-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67468-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67467-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67468-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics