Skip to main content

Fostering Relatedness Between Children and Virtual Agents Through Reciprocal Self-disclosure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
BNAIC 2016: Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2016)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 765))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A key challenge in developing companion agents for children is keeping them interested after novelty effects wear off. Self Determination Theory posits that motivation is sustained if the human feels related to another human. According to Social Penetration Theory, relatedness can be established through the reciprocal disclosure of information about the self. Inspired by these social psychology theories, we developed a disclosure dialog module to study the self-disclosing behavior of children in response to that of a virtual agent. The module was integrated into a mobile application with avatar presence for diabetic children and subsequently used by 11 children in an exploratory field study over the course of approximately two weeks at home. The number of disclosures that children made to the avatar during the study indicated the relatedness they felt towards the agent at the end of the study. While all children showed a decline in their usage over time, more related children used the application more, and more consistently than less related children. Avatar disclosures of lower intimacy were reciprocated more than avatar disclosures of higher intimacy. Girls reciprocated disclosures more frequently. No relationship was found between the intimacy level of agent disclosures and child disclosures. Particularly the last finding contradicts prior child-peer interaction research and should therefore be further examined in confirmatory research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.pal4u.eu/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.capt.org/.

  3. 3.

    http://latd.tv/Latitude-Robots-at-School-Findings.pdf.

  4. 4.

    It is important to note that positive and negative here are not synonymous with rewarding or punishing the child. An example for a positive discloser can be found in the example dialog. An example for a negative closer is “That’s alright. Maybe next time! In any case, thanks for listening.”.

  5. 5.

    https://www.w3.org/.

  6. 6.

    Cumulative link models are an extension of logistic regression to more than two categories. Thus, where logistic regression determines \(logit(P(Y_i = j))\) with \(J=2\), the cumulative link model determines \(logit(P(Y_i \le j))\) with j falling in one of J categories. The model thus accumulates the probabilities of a response being smaller than or equal to a certain category.

References

  1. Altman, I., Taylor, D.: Social Penetration Theory. Rinehart & Mnston, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baroni, I., Nalin, M., Baxter, P., Pozzi, C., Oleari, E., Sanna, A., Belpaeme, T.: What a robotic companion could do for a diabetic child. In: The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 936–941. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bukowski, W.M., Hoza, B., Boivin, M.: Measuring friendship quality during pre-and early adolescence: the development and psychometric properties of the friendship qualities scale. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 11(3), 471–484 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burger, F., Broekens, J., Neerincx, M.A.: A disclosure intimacy rating scale for child-agent interaction. In: Traum, D., Swartout, W., Khooshabeh, P., Kopp, S., Scherer, S., Leuski, A. (eds.) IVA 2016. LNCS, vol. 10011, pp. 392–396. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47665-0_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohn, N.B., Strassberg, D.S.: Self-disclosure reciprocity among preadolescents. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 9(1), 97–102 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Collins, N.L., Miller, L.C.: Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 116(3), 457 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.: Overview of self-determination theory: an organismic dialectical perspective. In: Handbook of Self-Determination Research, pp. 3–33 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., Buchner, A.: G* power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39(2), 175–191 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanda, T., Sato, R., Saiwaki, N., Ishiguro, H.: A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans. Robot. 23(5), 962–971 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kruijff-Korbayová, I., Oleari, E., Bagherzadhalimi, A., Sacchitelli, F., Kiefer, B., Racioppa, S., Pozzi, C., Sanna, A.: Young users’ perception of a social robot displaying familiarity and eliciting disclosure. ICSR 2015. LNCS, vol. 9388, pp. 380–389. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Moon, Y.: Intimate exchanges: using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. J. Consum. Res. 26(4), 323–339 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Rotenberg, K.J., Chase, N.: Development of the reciprocity of self-disclosure. J. Genet. Psychol. 153(1), 75–86 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rotenberg, K.J., Mann, L.: The development of the norm of the reciprocity of self-disclosure and its function in children’s attraction to peers. Child Dev. 57, 1349–1357 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rotenberg, K.J., Sliz, D.: Children’s restrictive disclosure to friends. Merrill-Palmer Q. 34, 203–215 (1988). (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Youniss, J.: Parents and Peers in Social Development: A Sullivan-Piaget Perspective. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franziska Burger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Burger, F., Broekens, J., Neerincx, M.A. (2017). Fostering Relatedness Between Children and Virtual Agents Through Reciprocal Self-disclosure. In: Bosse, T., Bredeweg, B. (eds) BNAIC 2016: Artificial Intelligence. BNAIC 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 765. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67468-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67468-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67467-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67468-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics